Constraints on the processing of indirect speech acts

Evidence from aphasiology

William Hirst, Joseph Ledoux, Susanna Stein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The ability of anterior aphasics and patients with right-hemisphere damage to comprehend both the literal and nonliteral readings of indirect speech acts was examined. Subjects viewed videotaped episodes in which one actor asked another "Can you X?" and the second actor responded with either an action or a simple "Yes." Subjects judged whether the response was appropriate given its context. Anterior aphasics could comprehend the nonliteral but not the literal reading, supporting models that posit that people have direct access to nonliteral but conventional readings. Patients with right-hemisphere damage could appreciate the direct reading, but failed to distinguish between appropriate and inappropriate action-responses. This finding suggests that it may be possible to dissociate the pragmatic and syntactic aspects of comprehension of indirect speech acts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)26-33
Number of pages8
JournalBrain and Language
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1984

Fingerprint

speech act
Reading
Patient Rights
evidence
damages
Aptitude
comprehension
pragmatics
Indirect Speech
Speech Acts
Aphasiology
ability
Aphasic
Right Hemisphere Damage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

Cite this

Constraints on the processing of indirect speech acts : Evidence from aphasiology. / Hirst, William; Ledoux, Joseph; Stein, Susanna.

In: Brain and Language, Vol. 23, No. 1, 1984, p. 26-33.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ecac34eea8fd41ccbd089e2c7ef9f2c3,
title = "Constraints on the processing of indirect speech acts: Evidence from aphasiology",
abstract = "The ability of anterior aphasics and patients with right-hemisphere damage to comprehend both the literal and nonliteral readings of indirect speech acts was examined. Subjects viewed videotaped episodes in which one actor asked another {"}Can you X?{"} and the second actor responded with either an action or a simple {"}Yes.{"} Subjects judged whether the response was appropriate given its context. Anterior aphasics could comprehend the nonliteral but not the literal reading, supporting models that posit that people have direct access to nonliteral but conventional readings. Patients with right-hemisphere damage could appreciate the direct reading, but failed to distinguish between appropriate and inappropriate action-responses. This finding suggests that it may be possible to dissociate the pragmatic and syntactic aspects of comprehension of indirect speech acts.",
author = "William Hirst and Joseph Ledoux and Susanna Stein",
year = "1984",
doi = "10.1016/0093-934X(84)90003-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "26--33",
journal = "Brain and Language",
issn = "0093-934X",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Constraints on the processing of indirect speech acts

T2 - Evidence from aphasiology

AU - Hirst, William

AU - Ledoux, Joseph

AU - Stein, Susanna

PY - 1984

Y1 - 1984

N2 - The ability of anterior aphasics and patients with right-hemisphere damage to comprehend both the literal and nonliteral readings of indirect speech acts was examined. Subjects viewed videotaped episodes in which one actor asked another "Can you X?" and the second actor responded with either an action or a simple "Yes." Subjects judged whether the response was appropriate given its context. Anterior aphasics could comprehend the nonliteral but not the literal reading, supporting models that posit that people have direct access to nonliteral but conventional readings. Patients with right-hemisphere damage could appreciate the direct reading, but failed to distinguish between appropriate and inappropriate action-responses. This finding suggests that it may be possible to dissociate the pragmatic and syntactic aspects of comprehension of indirect speech acts.

AB - The ability of anterior aphasics and patients with right-hemisphere damage to comprehend both the literal and nonliteral readings of indirect speech acts was examined. Subjects viewed videotaped episodes in which one actor asked another "Can you X?" and the second actor responded with either an action or a simple "Yes." Subjects judged whether the response was appropriate given its context. Anterior aphasics could comprehend the nonliteral but not the literal reading, supporting models that posit that people have direct access to nonliteral but conventional readings. Patients with right-hemisphere damage could appreciate the direct reading, but failed to distinguish between appropriate and inappropriate action-responses. This finding suggests that it may be possible to dissociate the pragmatic and syntactic aspects of comprehension of indirect speech acts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021208805&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021208805&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0093-934X(84)90003-8

DO - 10.1016/0093-934X(84)90003-8

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 26

EP - 33

JO - Brain and Language

JF - Brain and Language

SN - 0093-934X

IS - 1

ER -