Constraining differential rotation of Sun-like stars from asteroseismic and starspot rotation periods

Martin Bo Nielsen, H. Schunker, Laurent Gizon, W. H. Ball

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In previous work, we identified six Sun-like stars observed by Kepler with exceptionally clear asteroseismic signatures of rotation. Here, we show that five of these stars exhibit surface variability suitable for measuring rotation. We compare the rotation periods obtained from light-curve variability with those from asteroseismology in order to further constrain differential rotation. The two rotation measurement methods are found to agree within uncertainties, suggesting that radial differential rotation is weak, as is the case for the Sun. Furthermore, we find significant discrepancies between ages from asteroseismology and from three different gyrochronology relations, implying that stellar age estimation is problematic even for Sun-like stars.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numberA10
JournalAstronomy and Astrophysics
Volume582
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2015

Fingerprint

starspots
sun
stars
asteroseismology
measurement method
light curve
signatures

Keywords

  • Asteroseismology
  • Methods: data analysis
  • Stars: rotation
  • Stars: solar-type
  • Starspots

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Space and Planetary Science

Cite this

Constraining differential rotation of Sun-like stars from asteroseismic and starspot rotation periods. / Nielsen, Martin Bo; Schunker, H.; Gizon, Laurent; Ball, W. H.

In: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Vol. 582, A10, 01.10.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{25ed45c010984d2e85bc06b17e9953f3,
title = "Constraining differential rotation of Sun-like stars from asteroseismic and starspot rotation periods",
abstract = "In previous work, we identified six Sun-like stars observed by Kepler with exceptionally clear asteroseismic signatures of rotation. Here, we show that five of these stars exhibit surface variability suitable for measuring rotation. We compare the rotation periods obtained from light-curve variability with those from asteroseismology in order to further constrain differential rotation. The two rotation measurement methods are found to agree within uncertainties, suggesting that radial differential rotation is weak, as is the case for the Sun. Furthermore, we find significant discrepancies between ages from asteroseismology and from three different gyrochronology relations, implying that stellar age estimation is problematic even for Sun-like stars.",
keywords = "Asteroseismology, Methods: data analysis, Stars: rotation, Stars: solar-type, Starspots",
author = "Nielsen, {Martin Bo} and H. Schunker and Laurent Gizon and Ball, {W. H.}",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1051/0004-6361/201526615",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "582",
journal = "Astronomy and Astrophysics",
issn = "0004-6361",
publisher = "EDP Sciences",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Constraining differential rotation of Sun-like stars from asteroseismic and starspot rotation periods

AU - Nielsen, Martin Bo

AU - Schunker, H.

AU - Gizon, Laurent

AU - Ball, W. H.

PY - 2015/10/1

Y1 - 2015/10/1

N2 - In previous work, we identified six Sun-like stars observed by Kepler with exceptionally clear asteroseismic signatures of rotation. Here, we show that five of these stars exhibit surface variability suitable for measuring rotation. We compare the rotation periods obtained from light-curve variability with those from asteroseismology in order to further constrain differential rotation. The two rotation measurement methods are found to agree within uncertainties, suggesting that radial differential rotation is weak, as is the case for the Sun. Furthermore, we find significant discrepancies between ages from asteroseismology and from three different gyrochronology relations, implying that stellar age estimation is problematic even for Sun-like stars.

AB - In previous work, we identified six Sun-like stars observed by Kepler with exceptionally clear asteroseismic signatures of rotation. Here, we show that five of these stars exhibit surface variability suitable for measuring rotation. We compare the rotation periods obtained from light-curve variability with those from asteroseismology in order to further constrain differential rotation. The two rotation measurement methods are found to agree within uncertainties, suggesting that radial differential rotation is weak, as is the case for the Sun. Furthermore, we find significant discrepancies between ages from asteroseismology and from three different gyrochronology relations, implying that stellar age estimation is problematic even for Sun-like stars.

KW - Asteroseismology

KW - Methods: data analysis

KW - Stars: rotation

KW - Stars: solar-type

KW - Starspots

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942745842&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84942745842&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1051/0004-6361/201526615

DO - 10.1051/0004-6361/201526615

M3 - Article

VL - 582

JO - Astronomy and Astrophysics

JF - Astronomy and Astrophysics

SN - 0004-6361

M1 - A10

ER -