Considerations for a district-level, tunnel-risk, screening tool

Ehsan Moradabadi, Debra Laefer

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

To more rigorously address tunneling risks to above-ground structures, vulnerability evaluation of all structures along a tunnel route is required. This multi-block area along the route can be considered a district. To fully assess each structure within a tunnel's zone of influence, a multi-block or district-level model may provide new insights as to risk evaluation and mitigation strategies. However populating such a model with the existing geometry of the built environment poses a major challenge as measured drawings are not readily available for all structures along a tunnel's route. Cost-effective population of such a model could arguably involve remote sensing data in the form of laser scanning or photogramme-try. However even for unreinforced masonry structures, where external, above-ground geometries can be captured, without a prohibitively expensive building-by-building, in person survey many factors would remain unknown. To consider these uncertainties in an automatic way, a performance assessment framework is proposed. Such a framework allows a more rigorous, initial, risk quantification than is currently possible within the simple empirical models generally being used in industry when tunneling risk is initially assessed. This paper introduces (within the allowable space limits of this format) considerations for auto-population and application of a district-level, tunnel-risk screening tool.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationITA-AITES World Tunnel Congress 2016, WTC 2016
PublisherSociety for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration
Pages2272-2279
Number of pages8
Volume3
ISBN (Electronic)9781510822627
StatePublished - 2016
EventITA-AITES World Tunnel Congress 2016, WTC 2016 - San Francisco, United States
Duration: Apr 22 2016Apr 28 2016

Other

OtherITA-AITES World Tunnel Congress 2016, WTC 2016
CountryUnited States
CitySan Francisco
Period4/22/164/28/16

Fingerprint

Tunnels
Screening
Geometry
Remote sensing
Scanning
Lasers
Costs
Industry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering

Cite this

Moradabadi, E., & Laefer, D. (2016). Considerations for a district-level, tunnel-risk, screening tool. In ITA-AITES World Tunnel Congress 2016, WTC 2016 (Vol. 3, pp. 2272-2279). Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration.

Considerations for a district-level, tunnel-risk, screening tool. / Moradabadi, Ehsan; Laefer, Debra.

ITA-AITES World Tunnel Congress 2016, WTC 2016. Vol. 3 Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration, 2016. p. 2272-2279.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Moradabadi, E & Laefer, D 2016, Considerations for a district-level, tunnel-risk, screening tool. in ITA-AITES World Tunnel Congress 2016, WTC 2016. vol. 3, Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration, pp. 2272-2279, ITA-AITES World Tunnel Congress 2016, WTC 2016, San Francisco, United States, 4/22/16.
Moradabadi E, Laefer D. Considerations for a district-level, tunnel-risk, screening tool. In ITA-AITES World Tunnel Congress 2016, WTC 2016. Vol. 3. Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration. 2016. p. 2272-2279
Moradabadi, Ehsan ; Laefer, Debra. / Considerations for a district-level, tunnel-risk, screening tool. ITA-AITES World Tunnel Congress 2016, WTC 2016. Vol. 3 Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration, 2016. pp. 2272-2279
@inproceedings{913f2ef6a2a24824b2c2c2cabd85d906,
title = "Considerations for a district-level, tunnel-risk, screening tool",
abstract = "To more rigorously address tunneling risks to above-ground structures, vulnerability evaluation of all structures along a tunnel route is required. This multi-block area along the route can be considered a district. To fully assess each structure within a tunnel's zone of influence, a multi-block or district-level model may provide new insights as to risk evaluation and mitigation strategies. However populating such a model with the existing geometry of the built environment poses a major challenge as measured drawings are not readily available for all structures along a tunnel's route. Cost-effective population of such a model could arguably involve remote sensing data in the form of laser scanning or photogramme-try. However even for unreinforced masonry structures, where external, above-ground geometries can be captured, without a prohibitively expensive building-by-building, in person survey many factors would remain unknown. To consider these uncertainties in an automatic way, a performance assessment framework is proposed. Such a framework allows a more rigorous, initial, risk quantification than is currently possible within the simple empirical models generally being used in industry when tunneling risk is initially assessed. This paper introduces (within the allowable space limits of this format) considerations for auto-population and application of a district-level, tunnel-risk screening tool.",
author = "Ehsan Moradabadi and Debra Laefer",
year = "2016",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "2272--2279",
booktitle = "ITA-AITES World Tunnel Congress 2016, WTC 2016",
publisher = "Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration",
address = "United States",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Considerations for a district-level, tunnel-risk, screening tool

AU - Moradabadi, Ehsan

AU - Laefer, Debra

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - To more rigorously address tunneling risks to above-ground structures, vulnerability evaluation of all structures along a tunnel route is required. This multi-block area along the route can be considered a district. To fully assess each structure within a tunnel's zone of influence, a multi-block or district-level model may provide new insights as to risk evaluation and mitigation strategies. However populating such a model with the existing geometry of the built environment poses a major challenge as measured drawings are not readily available for all structures along a tunnel's route. Cost-effective population of such a model could arguably involve remote sensing data in the form of laser scanning or photogramme-try. However even for unreinforced masonry structures, where external, above-ground geometries can be captured, without a prohibitively expensive building-by-building, in person survey many factors would remain unknown. To consider these uncertainties in an automatic way, a performance assessment framework is proposed. Such a framework allows a more rigorous, initial, risk quantification than is currently possible within the simple empirical models generally being used in industry when tunneling risk is initially assessed. This paper introduces (within the allowable space limits of this format) considerations for auto-population and application of a district-level, tunnel-risk screening tool.

AB - To more rigorously address tunneling risks to above-ground structures, vulnerability evaluation of all structures along a tunnel route is required. This multi-block area along the route can be considered a district. To fully assess each structure within a tunnel's zone of influence, a multi-block or district-level model may provide new insights as to risk evaluation and mitigation strategies. However populating such a model with the existing geometry of the built environment poses a major challenge as measured drawings are not readily available for all structures along a tunnel's route. Cost-effective population of such a model could arguably involve remote sensing data in the form of laser scanning or photogramme-try. However even for unreinforced masonry structures, where external, above-ground geometries can be captured, without a prohibitively expensive building-by-building, in person survey many factors would remain unknown. To consider these uncertainties in an automatic way, a performance assessment framework is proposed. Such a framework allows a more rigorous, initial, risk quantification than is currently possible within the simple empirical models generally being used in industry when tunneling risk is initially assessed. This paper introduces (within the allowable space limits of this format) considerations for auto-population and application of a district-level, tunnel-risk screening tool.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84976318654&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84976318654&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

VL - 3

SP - 2272

EP - 2279

BT - ITA-AITES World Tunnel Congress 2016, WTC 2016

PB - Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration

ER -