Conflicts and paradoxes in the rhetoric of participation

Ernesto Ganuza, Gianpaolo Baiocchi, Nicole Summers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The expansion of participation processes and techniques around the world in recent years takes place under the rhetoric of citizen empowerment. This rhetoric has been questioned by many scholars, who often point out the weak impact of such practices and the new games of domination to which participation is submitted. This article examines this dilemma from the expansion of participatory budgeting in the global North. We propose a study of assembly processes involving the local public administration in the cities of Chicago and Córdoba. This process reveals conflicts and paradoxes that often remain hidden in the research, but nevertheless show struggles to appropriate and define the meaning of participation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)328-343
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Civil Society
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2 2016

Fingerprint

rhetoric
participation
local public
domination
public administration
empowerment
citizen

Keywords

  • Chicago
  • Córdoba
  • democracy
  • empowerment
  • Participation
  • public administration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Conflicts and paradoxes in the rhetoric of participation. / Ganuza, Ernesto; Baiocchi, Gianpaolo; Summers, Nicole.

In: Journal of Civil Society, Vol. 12, No. 3, 02.07.2016, p. 328-343.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ganuza, Ernesto ; Baiocchi, Gianpaolo ; Summers, Nicole. / Conflicts and paradoxes in the rhetoric of participation. In: Journal of Civil Society. 2016 ; Vol. 12, No. 3. pp. 328-343.
@article{fa25621ece3e46f9945e1e5ec38d0372,
title = "Conflicts and paradoxes in the rhetoric of participation",
abstract = "The expansion of participation processes and techniques around the world in recent years takes place under the rhetoric of citizen empowerment. This rhetoric has been questioned by many scholars, who often point out the weak impact of such practices and the new games of domination to which participation is submitted. This article examines this dilemma from the expansion of participatory budgeting in the global North. We propose a study of assembly processes involving the local public administration in the cities of Chicago and C{\'o}rdoba. This process reveals conflicts and paradoxes that often remain hidden in the research, but nevertheless show struggles to appropriate and define the meaning of participation.",
keywords = "Chicago, C{\'o}rdoba, democracy, empowerment, Participation, public administration",
author = "Ernesto Ganuza and Gianpaolo Baiocchi and Nicole Summers",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/17448689.2016.1215981",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "328--343",
journal = "Journal of Civil Society",
issn = "1744-8689",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conflicts and paradoxes in the rhetoric of participation

AU - Ganuza, Ernesto

AU - Baiocchi, Gianpaolo

AU - Summers, Nicole

PY - 2016/7/2

Y1 - 2016/7/2

N2 - The expansion of participation processes and techniques around the world in recent years takes place under the rhetoric of citizen empowerment. This rhetoric has been questioned by many scholars, who often point out the weak impact of such practices and the new games of domination to which participation is submitted. This article examines this dilemma from the expansion of participatory budgeting in the global North. We propose a study of assembly processes involving the local public administration in the cities of Chicago and Córdoba. This process reveals conflicts and paradoxes that often remain hidden in the research, but nevertheless show struggles to appropriate and define the meaning of participation.

AB - The expansion of participation processes and techniques around the world in recent years takes place under the rhetoric of citizen empowerment. This rhetoric has been questioned by many scholars, who often point out the weak impact of such practices and the new games of domination to which participation is submitted. This article examines this dilemma from the expansion of participatory budgeting in the global North. We propose a study of assembly processes involving the local public administration in the cities of Chicago and Córdoba. This process reveals conflicts and paradoxes that often remain hidden in the research, but nevertheless show struggles to appropriate and define the meaning of participation.

KW - Chicago

KW - Córdoba

KW - democracy

KW - empowerment

KW - Participation

KW - public administration

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988036887&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84988036887&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/17448689.2016.1215981

DO - 10.1080/17448689.2016.1215981

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84988036887

VL - 12

SP - 328

EP - 343

JO - Journal of Civil Society

JF - Journal of Civil Society

SN - 1744-8689

IS - 3

ER -