Conclusions: From self-knowledge to a science of the self

Jacek Debiec, Joseph Ledoux

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Traditional accounts of the self represented in religion, literature, philosophy, and other branches of the humanities, are grounded in the subject's personal introspections. This source of knowledge has had a profound impact on terminology, concepts, and theories of the self. By contrast, the scientific method, which uses observational and experimental data, is aimed at objective analyses. The scientific approach to the self, by its very nature, is distinct from the approach in the humanities, and therefore reveals a different view of the self, and sparks new debate about what the self really is. Moreover, different scientific disciplines, spanning the natural and social sciences, investigate different levels of organization, leading to a multifaceted scientific picture of the self. This conference and volume explored areas where some of the different approaches to the self overlap and will, it is hoped, promote the establishment of a richer, more coherent image of what the self is.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)305-315
Number of pages11
JournalAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Volume1001
DOIs
StatePublished - 2003

Fingerprint

Natural sciences
Social sciences
Terminology
Electric sparks
Natural Science Disciplines
Social Sciences
Religion
Self Concept
Self-knowledge

Keywords

  • Brain
  • First-person account
  • Humanities
  • Science
  • Self
  • Third-person account

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)

Cite this

Conclusions : From self-knowledge to a science of the self. / Debiec, Jacek; Ledoux, Joseph.

In: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 1001, 2003, p. 305-315.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4cd75340436647d7b222933c44b97fc5,
title = "Conclusions: From self-knowledge to a science of the self",
abstract = "Traditional accounts of the self represented in religion, literature, philosophy, and other branches of the humanities, are grounded in the subject's personal introspections. This source of knowledge has had a profound impact on terminology, concepts, and theories of the self. By contrast, the scientific method, which uses observational and experimental data, is aimed at objective analyses. The scientific approach to the self, by its very nature, is distinct from the approach in the humanities, and therefore reveals a different view of the self, and sparks new debate about what the self really is. Moreover, different scientific disciplines, spanning the natural and social sciences, investigate different levels of organization, leading to a multifaceted scientific picture of the self. This conference and volume explored areas where some of the different approaches to the self overlap and will, it is hoped, promote the establishment of a richer, more coherent image of what the self is.",
keywords = "Brain, First-person account, Humanities, Science, Self, Third-person account",
author = "Jacek Debiec and Joseph Ledoux",
year = "2003",
doi = "10.1196/annals.1279.018",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1001",
pages = "305--315",
journal = "Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences",
issn = "0077-8923",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conclusions

T2 - From self-knowledge to a science of the self

AU - Debiec, Jacek

AU - Ledoux, Joseph

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - Traditional accounts of the self represented in religion, literature, philosophy, and other branches of the humanities, are grounded in the subject's personal introspections. This source of knowledge has had a profound impact on terminology, concepts, and theories of the self. By contrast, the scientific method, which uses observational and experimental data, is aimed at objective analyses. The scientific approach to the self, by its very nature, is distinct from the approach in the humanities, and therefore reveals a different view of the self, and sparks new debate about what the self really is. Moreover, different scientific disciplines, spanning the natural and social sciences, investigate different levels of organization, leading to a multifaceted scientific picture of the self. This conference and volume explored areas where some of the different approaches to the self overlap and will, it is hoped, promote the establishment of a richer, more coherent image of what the self is.

AB - Traditional accounts of the self represented in religion, literature, philosophy, and other branches of the humanities, are grounded in the subject's personal introspections. This source of knowledge has had a profound impact on terminology, concepts, and theories of the self. By contrast, the scientific method, which uses observational and experimental data, is aimed at objective analyses. The scientific approach to the self, by its very nature, is distinct from the approach in the humanities, and therefore reveals a different view of the self, and sparks new debate about what the self really is. Moreover, different scientific disciplines, spanning the natural and social sciences, investigate different levels of organization, leading to a multifaceted scientific picture of the self. This conference and volume explored areas where some of the different approaches to the self overlap and will, it is hoped, promote the establishment of a richer, more coherent image of what the self is.

KW - Brain

KW - First-person account

KW - Humanities

KW - Science

KW - Self

KW - Third-person account

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1942474477&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1942474477&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1196/annals.1279.018

DO - 10.1196/annals.1279.018

M3 - Article

VL - 1001

SP - 305

EP - 315

JO - Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

JF - Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

SN - 0077-8923

ER -