Conclusion

Towards a new understanding of the history of opera?

Thomas Ertman

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    As this collection has demonstrated, an exciting process of convergence is under way in the world of opera studies. The attention generated by the “critical” approach to opera, with its desire to read contemporary meanings into canonical works, has obscured the fact that many opera scholars who stand outside of this paradigm, be they musicologists, literary theorists, historians, or sociologists, are currently engaged in a common project: namely the reconstruction “ based often on painstaking archival research “ of the conditions of operatic production, reception, and social instrumentalization during different periods of the genre's four centuries of existence. It is this project that represents the common denominator between those following a “systems of meaning” and those employing a “conditions of production” approach and one that, as Victoria Johnson has shown in her introduction, was made possible by the historical “turn” within the humanities and social sciences over the last two decades. As Craig Calhoun, Herbert Lindenberger, and Jane Fulcher have all argued in this volume, a close elective affinity exists between this recent research within opera studies and the theories of the French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu. In her contributions here, Fulcher has illustrated one way in which this often difficult body of writings can be put to use in understanding opera. She argues that Bourdieu's idea of a struggle among elites as well as between elites and non-elites over symbolic legitimacy and domination allows for a more complex understanding of the relationship between state power and ideology and art works produced under various forms of state sponsorship.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Title of host publicationOpera and Society in Italy and France from Monteverdi to Bourdieu
    PublisherCambridge University Press
    Pages351-363
    Number of pages13
    ISBN (Electronic)9780511481734
    ISBN (Print)0521856752, 9780521856751
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 2007

    Fingerprint

    Opera
    History
    Elites
    Sociologists
    Sponsorship
    State Power
    Legitimacy
    Social Sciences
    Ideology
    Domination
    Paradigm
    Elective Affinity
    Reception
    Historian
    Archival Research
    Pierre Bourdieu
    Literary Theorists
    Musicologists
    Works of Art

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Arts and Humanities(all)

    Cite this

    Ertman, T. (2007). Conclusion: Towards a new understanding of the history of opera? In Opera and Society in Italy and France from Monteverdi to Bourdieu (pp. 351-363). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511481734.019

    Conclusion : Towards a new understanding of the history of opera? / Ertman, Thomas.

    Opera and Society in Italy and France from Monteverdi to Bourdieu. Cambridge University Press, 2007. p. 351-363.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Ertman, T 2007, Conclusion: Towards a new understanding of the history of opera? in Opera and Society in Italy and France from Monteverdi to Bourdieu. Cambridge University Press, pp. 351-363. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511481734.019
    Ertman T. Conclusion: Towards a new understanding of the history of opera? In Opera and Society in Italy and France from Monteverdi to Bourdieu. Cambridge University Press. 2007. p. 351-363 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511481734.019
    Ertman, Thomas. / Conclusion : Towards a new understanding of the history of opera?. Opera and Society in Italy and France from Monteverdi to Bourdieu. Cambridge University Press, 2007. pp. 351-363
    @inbook{0d07f5b4ea5d46b6b0f9cf01dbdfcf2c,
    title = "Conclusion: Towards a new understanding of the history of opera?",
    abstract = "As this collection has demonstrated, an exciting process of convergence is under way in the world of opera studies. The attention generated by the “critical” approach to opera, with its desire to read contemporary meanings into canonical works, has obscured the fact that many opera scholars who stand outside of this paradigm, be they musicologists, literary theorists, historians, or sociologists, are currently engaged in a common project: namely the reconstruction “ based often on painstaking archival research “ of the conditions of operatic production, reception, and social instrumentalization during different periods of the genre's four centuries of existence. It is this project that represents the common denominator between those following a “systems of meaning” and those employing a “conditions of production” approach and one that, as Victoria Johnson has shown in her introduction, was made possible by the historical “turn” within the humanities and social sciences over the last two decades. As Craig Calhoun, Herbert Lindenberger, and Jane Fulcher have all argued in this volume, a close elective affinity exists between this recent research within opera studies and the theories of the French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu. In her contributions here, Fulcher has illustrated one way in which this often difficult body of writings can be put to use in understanding opera. She argues that Bourdieu's idea of a struggle among elites as well as between elites and non-elites over symbolic legitimacy and domination allows for a more complex understanding of the relationship between state power and ideology and art works produced under various forms of state sponsorship.",
    author = "Thomas Ertman",
    year = "2007",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511481734.019",
    language = "English (US)",
    isbn = "0521856752",
    pages = "351--363",
    booktitle = "Opera and Society in Italy and France from Monteverdi to Bourdieu",
    publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
    address = "United Kingdom",

    }

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - Conclusion

    T2 - Towards a new understanding of the history of opera?

    AU - Ertman, Thomas

    PY - 2007/1/1

    Y1 - 2007/1/1

    N2 - As this collection has demonstrated, an exciting process of convergence is under way in the world of opera studies. The attention generated by the “critical” approach to opera, with its desire to read contemporary meanings into canonical works, has obscured the fact that many opera scholars who stand outside of this paradigm, be they musicologists, literary theorists, historians, or sociologists, are currently engaged in a common project: namely the reconstruction “ based often on painstaking archival research “ of the conditions of operatic production, reception, and social instrumentalization during different periods of the genre's four centuries of existence. It is this project that represents the common denominator between those following a “systems of meaning” and those employing a “conditions of production” approach and one that, as Victoria Johnson has shown in her introduction, was made possible by the historical “turn” within the humanities and social sciences over the last two decades. As Craig Calhoun, Herbert Lindenberger, and Jane Fulcher have all argued in this volume, a close elective affinity exists between this recent research within opera studies and the theories of the French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu. In her contributions here, Fulcher has illustrated one way in which this often difficult body of writings can be put to use in understanding opera. She argues that Bourdieu's idea of a struggle among elites as well as between elites and non-elites over symbolic legitimacy and domination allows for a more complex understanding of the relationship between state power and ideology and art works produced under various forms of state sponsorship.

    AB - As this collection has demonstrated, an exciting process of convergence is under way in the world of opera studies. The attention generated by the “critical” approach to opera, with its desire to read contemporary meanings into canonical works, has obscured the fact that many opera scholars who stand outside of this paradigm, be they musicologists, literary theorists, historians, or sociologists, are currently engaged in a common project: namely the reconstruction “ based often on painstaking archival research “ of the conditions of operatic production, reception, and social instrumentalization during different periods of the genre's four centuries of existence. It is this project that represents the common denominator between those following a “systems of meaning” and those employing a “conditions of production” approach and one that, as Victoria Johnson has shown in her introduction, was made possible by the historical “turn” within the humanities and social sciences over the last two decades. As Craig Calhoun, Herbert Lindenberger, and Jane Fulcher have all argued in this volume, a close elective affinity exists between this recent research within opera studies and the theories of the French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu. In her contributions here, Fulcher has illustrated one way in which this often difficult body of writings can be put to use in understanding opera. She argues that Bourdieu's idea of a struggle among elites as well as between elites and non-elites over symbolic legitimacy and domination allows for a more complex understanding of the relationship between state power and ideology and art works produced under various forms of state sponsorship.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928926884&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928926884&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511481734.019

    DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511481734.019

    M3 - Chapter

    SN - 0521856752

    SN - 9780521856751

    SP - 351

    EP - 363

    BT - Opera and Society in Italy and France from Monteverdi to Bourdieu

    PB - Cambridge University Press

    ER -