Concept formation and categorization of complex, asymmetric, and impossible figures

Sarah M. Shuwairi, Rebecca Bainbridge, Gregory Murphy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Impossible figures are striking examples of inconsistencies between global and local perceptual structures, in which the overall spatial configuration of the depicted image does not yield a coherent three-dimensional object. In order to investigate whether structural "impossibility" is an important perceptual property of depicted objects, we used a category formation task in which subjects were asked to divide pictures of shapes into groups that seemed most natural to them. Category formation is usually unidimensional, such that sorting is dominated by a single perceptual property, so this task can serve as a measure of which dimensions are most salient. In Experiment 1, subjects received sets of 12 line drawings consisting of six possible and six impossible objects. Very few subjects grouped the figures by impossibility on the first try, and only half did so after multiple attempts at sorting. In Experiment 2, we investigated other global properties of figures: symmetry and complexity. Subjects readily sorted objects by complexity, but seldom by symmetry. In Experiment 3, subjects were asked to draw each of the figures before sorting them, which had only a minimal effect on categorization. Finally, in Experiment 4, subjects were explicitly instructed to divide the shapes by symmetry or impossibility. Performance on this task was perfect for symmetry, but not for impossibility. Although global properties of figures seem extremely important to our perception, the results suggest that some of these cues are not immediately obvious or salient for most observers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1789-1802
Number of pages14
JournalAttention, Perception, and Psychophysics
Volume76
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Concept Formation
concept formation
Task Performance and Analysis
Cues
experiment
Experiment
Symmetry
Impossibility
performance

Keywords

  • 2-D, 3-D
  • Categorization
  • Concept formation
  • Impossible figures
  • Object recognition
  • Shape perception

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sensory Systems
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Concept formation and categorization of complex, asymmetric, and impossible figures. / Shuwairi, Sarah M.; Bainbridge, Rebecca; Murphy, Gregory.

In: Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, Vol. 76, No. 6, 2014, p. 1789-1802.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shuwairi, Sarah M. ; Bainbridge, Rebecca ; Murphy, Gregory. / Concept formation and categorization of complex, asymmetric, and impossible figures. In: Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics. 2014 ; Vol. 76, No. 6. pp. 1789-1802.
@article{472f715868fa43668c4408054c253325,
title = "Concept formation and categorization of complex, asymmetric, and impossible figures",
abstract = "Impossible figures are striking examples of inconsistencies between global and local perceptual structures, in which the overall spatial configuration of the depicted image does not yield a coherent three-dimensional object. In order to investigate whether structural {"}impossibility{"} is an important perceptual property of depicted objects, we used a category formation task in which subjects were asked to divide pictures of shapes into groups that seemed most natural to them. Category formation is usually unidimensional, such that sorting is dominated by a single perceptual property, so this task can serve as a measure of which dimensions are most salient. In Experiment 1, subjects received sets of 12 line drawings consisting of six possible and six impossible objects. Very few subjects grouped the figures by impossibility on the first try, and only half did so after multiple attempts at sorting. In Experiment 2, we investigated other global properties of figures: symmetry and complexity. Subjects readily sorted objects by complexity, but seldom by symmetry. In Experiment 3, subjects were asked to draw each of the figures before sorting them, which had only a minimal effect on categorization. Finally, in Experiment 4, subjects were explicitly instructed to divide the shapes by symmetry or impossibility. Performance on this task was perfect for symmetry, but not for impossibility. Although global properties of figures seem extremely important to our perception, the results suggest that some of these cues are not immediately obvious or salient for most observers.",
keywords = "2-D, 3-D, Categorization, Concept formation, Impossible figures, Object recognition, Shape perception",
author = "Shuwairi, {Sarah M.} and Rebecca Bainbridge and Gregory Murphy",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.3758/s13414-014-0691-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "76",
pages = "1789--1802",
journal = "Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics",
issn = "1943-3921",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Concept formation and categorization of complex, asymmetric, and impossible figures

AU - Shuwairi, Sarah M.

AU - Bainbridge, Rebecca

AU - Murphy, Gregory

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Impossible figures are striking examples of inconsistencies between global and local perceptual structures, in which the overall spatial configuration of the depicted image does not yield a coherent three-dimensional object. In order to investigate whether structural "impossibility" is an important perceptual property of depicted objects, we used a category formation task in which subjects were asked to divide pictures of shapes into groups that seemed most natural to them. Category formation is usually unidimensional, such that sorting is dominated by a single perceptual property, so this task can serve as a measure of which dimensions are most salient. In Experiment 1, subjects received sets of 12 line drawings consisting of six possible and six impossible objects. Very few subjects grouped the figures by impossibility on the first try, and only half did so after multiple attempts at sorting. In Experiment 2, we investigated other global properties of figures: symmetry and complexity. Subjects readily sorted objects by complexity, but seldom by symmetry. In Experiment 3, subjects were asked to draw each of the figures before sorting them, which had only a minimal effect on categorization. Finally, in Experiment 4, subjects were explicitly instructed to divide the shapes by symmetry or impossibility. Performance on this task was perfect for symmetry, but not for impossibility. Although global properties of figures seem extremely important to our perception, the results suggest that some of these cues are not immediately obvious or salient for most observers.

AB - Impossible figures are striking examples of inconsistencies between global and local perceptual structures, in which the overall spatial configuration of the depicted image does not yield a coherent three-dimensional object. In order to investigate whether structural "impossibility" is an important perceptual property of depicted objects, we used a category formation task in which subjects were asked to divide pictures of shapes into groups that seemed most natural to them. Category formation is usually unidimensional, such that sorting is dominated by a single perceptual property, so this task can serve as a measure of which dimensions are most salient. In Experiment 1, subjects received sets of 12 line drawings consisting of six possible and six impossible objects. Very few subjects grouped the figures by impossibility on the first try, and only half did so after multiple attempts at sorting. In Experiment 2, we investigated other global properties of figures: symmetry and complexity. Subjects readily sorted objects by complexity, but seldom by symmetry. In Experiment 3, subjects were asked to draw each of the figures before sorting them, which had only a minimal effect on categorization. Finally, in Experiment 4, subjects were explicitly instructed to divide the shapes by symmetry or impossibility. Performance on this task was perfect for symmetry, but not for impossibility. Although global properties of figures seem extremely important to our perception, the results suggest that some of these cues are not immediately obvious or salient for most observers.

KW - 2-D, 3-D

KW - Categorization

KW - Concept formation

KW - Impossible figures

KW - Object recognition

KW - Shape perception

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906333114&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84906333114&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/s13414-014-0691-6

DO - 10.3758/s13414-014-0691-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 24924847

AN - SCOPUS:84906333114

VL - 76

SP - 1789

EP - 1802

JO - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

JF - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

SN - 1943-3921

IS - 6

ER -