Computation of inertial motion

Neural strategies to resolve ambiguous otolith information

Dora Angelaki, M. Quinn McHenry, J. David Dickman, Shawn D. Newlands, Bernhard J M Hess

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

According to Einstein's equivalence principle, inertial accelerations during translational motion are physically indistinguishable from gravitational accelerations experienced during tilting movements. Nevertheless, despite ambiguous sensory representation of motion in primary otolith afferents, primate oculomotor responses are appropriately compensatory for the correct translational component of the head movement. The neural computational strategies used by the brain to discriminate the two and to reliably detect translational motion were investigated in the primate vestibule-ocular system. The experimental protocols consisted of either lateral translations, roll tilts, or combined translation-tilt paradigms. Results using both steady-state sinusoidal and transient motion profiles in darkness or near target viewing demonstrated that semicircular canal signals are necessary sensory cues for the discrimination between different sources of linear acceleration. When the semicircular canals were inactivated, horizontal eye movements (appropriate for translational motion) could no longer be correlated with head translation. Instead, translational eye movements totally reflected the erroneous primary otolith afferent signals and were correlated with the resultant acceleration, regardless of whether it resulted from translation or tilt. Therefore, at least for frequencies in which the vestibule-ocular reflex is important for gaze stabilization (>0.1 Hz), the oculomotor system discriminates between head translation and tilt primarily by sensory integration mechanisms rather than frequency segregation of otolith afferent information. Nonlinear neural computational schemes are proposed in which not only linear acceleration information from the otolith receptors but also angular velocity signals from the semicircular canals are simultaneously used by the brain to correctly estimate the source of linear acceleration and to elicit appropriate oculomotor responses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)316-327
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Neuroscience
Volume19
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1 1999

Fingerprint

Otolithic Membrane
Semicircular Canals
Eye Movements
Primates
Head
Head Movements
Darkness
Brain
Cues
Reflex

Keywords

  • Eye movements
  • Gravity
  • Inertial
  • Navigation
  • Neural computation
  • Oculomotor
  • Vestibular

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Angelaki, D., McHenry, M. Q., Dickman, J. D., Newlands, S. D., & Hess, B. J. M. (1999). Computation of inertial motion: Neural strategies to resolve ambiguous otolith information. Journal of Neuroscience, 19(1), 316-327.

Computation of inertial motion : Neural strategies to resolve ambiguous otolith information. / Angelaki, Dora; McHenry, M. Quinn; Dickman, J. David; Newlands, Shawn D.; Hess, Bernhard J M.

In: Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 19, No. 1, 01.01.1999, p. 316-327.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Angelaki, D, McHenry, MQ, Dickman, JD, Newlands, SD & Hess, BJM 1999, 'Computation of inertial motion: Neural strategies to resolve ambiguous otolith information', Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 316-327.
Angelaki, Dora ; McHenry, M. Quinn ; Dickman, J. David ; Newlands, Shawn D. ; Hess, Bernhard J M. / Computation of inertial motion : Neural strategies to resolve ambiguous otolith information. In: Journal of Neuroscience. 1999 ; Vol. 19, No. 1. pp. 316-327.
@article{b82cad65100847f8a5041910636d7741,
title = "Computation of inertial motion: Neural strategies to resolve ambiguous otolith information",
abstract = "According to Einstein's equivalence principle, inertial accelerations during translational motion are physically indistinguishable from gravitational accelerations experienced during tilting movements. Nevertheless, despite ambiguous sensory representation of motion in primary otolith afferents, primate oculomotor responses are appropriately compensatory for the correct translational component of the head movement. The neural computational strategies used by the brain to discriminate the two and to reliably detect translational motion were investigated in the primate vestibule-ocular system. The experimental protocols consisted of either lateral translations, roll tilts, or combined translation-tilt paradigms. Results using both steady-state sinusoidal and transient motion profiles in darkness or near target viewing demonstrated that semicircular canal signals are necessary sensory cues for the discrimination between different sources of linear acceleration. When the semicircular canals were inactivated, horizontal eye movements (appropriate for translational motion) could no longer be correlated with head translation. Instead, translational eye movements totally reflected the erroneous primary otolith afferent signals and were correlated with the resultant acceleration, regardless of whether it resulted from translation or tilt. Therefore, at least for frequencies in which the vestibule-ocular reflex is important for gaze stabilization (>0.1 Hz), the oculomotor system discriminates between head translation and tilt primarily by sensory integration mechanisms rather than frequency segregation of otolith afferent information. Nonlinear neural computational schemes are proposed in which not only linear acceleration information from the otolith receptors but also angular velocity signals from the semicircular canals are simultaneously used by the brain to correctly estimate the source of linear acceleration and to elicit appropriate oculomotor responses.",
keywords = "Eye movements, Gravity, Inertial, Navigation, Neural computation, Oculomotor, Vestibular",
author = "Dora Angelaki and McHenry, {M. Quinn} and Dickman, {J. David} and Newlands, {Shawn D.} and Hess, {Bernhard J M}",
year = "1999",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "316--327",
journal = "Journal of Neuroscience",
issn = "0270-6474",
publisher = "Society for Neuroscience",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Computation of inertial motion

T2 - Neural strategies to resolve ambiguous otolith information

AU - Angelaki, Dora

AU - McHenry, M. Quinn

AU - Dickman, J. David

AU - Newlands, Shawn D.

AU - Hess, Bernhard J M

PY - 1999/1/1

Y1 - 1999/1/1

N2 - According to Einstein's equivalence principle, inertial accelerations during translational motion are physically indistinguishable from gravitational accelerations experienced during tilting movements. Nevertheless, despite ambiguous sensory representation of motion in primary otolith afferents, primate oculomotor responses are appropriately compensatory for the correct translational component of the head movement. The neural computational strategies used by the brain to discriminate the two and to reliably detect translational motion were investigated in the primate vestibule-ocular system. The experimental protocols consisted of either lateral translations, roll tilts, or combined translation-tilt paradigms. Results using both steady-state sinusoidal and transient motion profiles in darkness or near target viewing demonstrated that semicircular canal signals are necessary sensory cues for the discrimination between different sources of linear acceleration. When the semicircular canals were inactivated, horizontal eye movements (appropriate for translational motion) could no longer be correlated with head translation. Instead, translational eye movements totally reflected the erroneous primary otolith afferent signals and were correlated with the resultant acceleration, regardless of whether it resulted from translation or tilt. Therefore, at least for frequencies in which the vestibule-ocular reflex is important for gaze stabilization (>0.1 Hz), the oculomotor system discriminates between head translation and tilt primarily by sensory integration mechanisms rather than frequency segregation of otolith afferent information. Nonlinear neural computational schemes are proposed in which not only linear acceleration information from the otolith receptors but also angular velocity signals from the semicircular canals are simultaneously used by the brain to correctly estimate the source of linear acceleration and to elicit appropriate oculomotor responses.

AB - According to Einstein's equivalence principle, inertial accelerations during translational motion are physically indistinguishable from gravitational accelerations experienced during tilting movements. Nevertheless, despite ambiguous sensory representation of motion in primary otolith afferents, primate oculomotor responses are appropriately compensatory for the correct translational component of the head movement. The neural computational strategies used by the brain to discriminate the two and to reliably detect translational motion were investigated in the primate vestibule-ocular system. The experimental protocols consisted of either lateral translations, roll tilts, or combined translation-tilt paradigms. Results using both steady-state sinusoidal and transient motion profiles in darkness or near target viewing demonstrated that semicircular canal signals are necessary sensory cues for the discrimination between different sources of linear acceleration. When the semicircular canals were inactivated, horizontal eye movements (appropriate for translational motion) could no longer be correlated with head translation. Instead, translational eye movements totally reflected the erroneous primary otolith afferent signals and were correlated with the resultant acceleration, regardless of whether it resulted from translation or tilt. Therefore, at least for frequencies in which the vestibule-ocular reflex is important for gaze stabilization (>0.1 Hz), the oculomotor system discriminates between head translation and tilt primarily by sensory integration mechanisms rather than frequency segregation of otolith afferent information. Nonlinear neural computational schemes are proposed in which not only linear acceleration information from the otolith receptors but also angular velocity signals from the semicircular canals are simultaneously used by the brain to correctly estimate the source of linear acceleration and to elicit appropriate oculomotor responses.

KW - Eye movements

KW - Gravity

KW - Inertial

KW - Navigation

KW - Neural computation

KW - Oculomotor

KW - Vestibular

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032930244&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032930244&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 316

EP - 327

JO - Journal of Neuroscience

JF - Journal of Neuroscience

SN - 0270-6474

IS - 1

ER -