Comprehension of linguistic dependencies: Speed-accuracy tradeoff evidence for direct-access retrieval from memory

Stephani Foraker, Brian McElree

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Comprehenders can rapidly and efficiently interpret expressions with various types of non-adjacent dependencies. In the sentence The boy that the teacher warned fell, boy is readily interpreted as the subject of the verb fall despite the fact that a relative clause, that the teacher warned, intervenes between the two dependent elements. We review research investigating three memory operations proposed for resolving this and other types of non-adjacent dependencies: serial search retrieval, in which the dependent constituent is recovered by a search process through representations in memory, direct-access retrieval in which the dependent constituent is recovered directly by retrieval cue operations without search, and active maintenance of the dependent constituent in focal attention. Studies using speed-accuracy tradeoff methodology to examine the full timecourse of interpreting a wide range of non-adjacent dependencies indicate that comprehenders retrieve dependent constituents with a direct-access operation, consistent with the claim that representations formed during comprehension are accessed with a cue-driven, content-addressable retrieval process. The observed timecourse profiles are inconsistent with a broad class of models based on several search operations for retrieval. The profiles are also inconsistent with active maintenance of a constituent while concurrently processing subsequent material, and suggest that, with few exceptions, direct-access retrieval is required to process non-adjacent dependencies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)764-783
Number of pages20
JournalLinguistics and Language Compass
Volume5
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2011

Fingerprint

comprehension
linguistics
evidence
teacher
methodology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Comprehension of linguistic dependencies : Speed-accuracy tradeoff evidence for direct-access retrieval from memory. / Foraker, Stephani; McElree, Brian.

In: Linguistics and Language Compass, Vol. 5, No. 11, 11.2011, p. 764-783.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{23713efea8fe47d09475bbbbf018c42b,
title = "Comprehension of linguistic dependencies: Speed-accuracy tradeoff evidence for direct-access retrieval from memory",
abstract = "Comprehenders can rapidly and efficiently interpret expressions with various types of non-adjacent dependencies. In the sentence The boy that the teacher warned fell, boy is readily interpreted as the subject of the verb fall despite the fact that a relative clause, that the teacher warned, intervenes between the two dependent elements. We review research investigating three memory operations proposed for resolving this and other types of non-adjacent dependencies: serial search retrieval, in which the dependent constituent is recovered by a search process through representations in memory, direct-access retrieval in which the dependent constituent is recovered directly by retrieval cue operations without search, and active maintenance of the dependent constituent in focal attention. Studies using speed-accuracy tradeoff methodology to examine the full timecourse of interpreting a wide range of non-adjacent dependencies indicate that comprehenders retrieve dependent constituents with a direct-access operation, consistent with the claim that representations formed during comprehension are accessed with a cue-driven, content-addressable retrieval process. The observed timecourse profiles are inconsistent with a broad class of models based on several search operations for retrieval. The profiles are also inconsistent with active maintenance of a constituent while concurrently processing subsequent material, and suggest that, with few exceptions, direct-access retrieval is required to process non-adjacent dependencies.",
author = "Stephani Foraker and Brian McElree",
year = "2011",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1111/j.1749-818X.2011.00313.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "764--783",
journal = "Linguistics and Language Compass",
issn = "1749-818X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comprehension of linguistic dependencies

T2 - Speed-accuracy tradeoff evidence for direct-access retrieval from memory

AU - Foraker, Stephani

AU - McElree, Brian

PY - 2011/11

Y1 - 2011/11

N2 - Comprehenders can rapidly and efficiently interpret expressions with various types of non-adjacent dependencies. In the sentence The boy that the teacher warned fell, boy is readily interpreted as the subject of the verb fall despite the fact that a relative clause, that the teacher warned, intervenes between the two dependent elements. We review research investigating three memory operations proposed for resolving this and other types of non-adjacent dependencies: serial search retrieval, in which the dependent constituent is recovered by a search process through representations in memory, direct-access retrieval in which the dependent constituent is recovered directly by retrieval cue operations without search, and active maintenance of the dependent constituent in focal attention. Studies using speed-accuracy tradeoff methodology to examine the full timecourse of interpreting a wide range of non-adjacent dependencies indicate that comprehenders retrieve dependent constituents with a direct-access operation, consistent with the claim that representations formed during comprehension are accessed with a cue-driven, content-addressable retrieval process. The observed timecourse profiles are inconsistent with a broad class of models based on several search operations for retrieval. The profiles are also inconsistent with active maintenance of a constituent while concurrently processing subsequent material, and suggest that, with few exceptions, direct-access retrieval is required to process non-adjacent dependencies.

AB - Comprehenders can rapidly and efficiently interpret expressions with various types of non-adjacent dependencies. In the sentence The boy that the teacher warned fell, boy is readily interpreted as the subject of the verb fall despite the fact that a relative clause, that the teacher warned, intervenes between the two dependent elements. We review research investigating three memory operations proposed for resolving this and other types of non-adjacent dependencies: serial search retrieval, in which the dependent constituent is recovered by a search process through representations in memory, direct-access retrieval in which the dependent constituent is recovered directly by retrieval cue operations without search, and active maintenance of the dependent constituent in focal attention. Studies using speed-accuracy tradeoff methodology to examine the full timecourse of interpreting a wide range of non-adjacent dependencies indicate that comprehenders retrieve dependent constituents with a direct-access operation, consistent with the claim that representations formed during comprehension are accessed with a cue-driven, content-addressable retrieval process. The observed timecourse profiles are inconsistent with a broad class of models based on several search operations for retrieval. The profiles are also inconsistent with active maintenance of a constituent while concurrently processing subsequent material, and suggest that, with few exceptions, direct-access retrieval is required to process non-adjacent dependencies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80155194925&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80155194925&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2011.00313.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2011.00313.x

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 764

EP - 783

JO - Linguistics and Language Compass

JF - Linguistics and Language Compass

SN - 1749-818X

IS - 11

ER -