Comprehension of familiar phrases by left- but not by right-hemisphere damaged patients

Diana Roupas Van Lancker, Daniel Kempler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Single words, familiar phrases (idioms and speech formulas), and novel sentences (matched to the familiar phrases in length, frequency, and structure) were selected for a picture-matching auditory comprehension task and administered to left- and right-brain damaged (LBD, RBD) subjects. The groups did not differ in single word comprehension. A 2 × 2 ANOVA revealed opposite patterns on the two other tasks, with LBD subjects performing worse on novel than familiar phrases, and RBD subject impaired on familiar phrase but not on novel sentence comprehension. The role of grammatical/referential vs. holistic/inferential meaning in left and right hemisphere function is discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)265-277
Number of pages13
JournalBrain and Language
Volume32
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1987

Fingerprint

comprehension
Analysis of Variance
brain
Brain
Right Hemisphere
Group

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

Cite this

Comprehension of familiar phrases by left- but not by right-hemisphere damaged patients. / Van Lancker, Diana Roupas; Kempler, Daniel.

In: Brain and Language, Vol. 32, No. 2, 1987, p. 265-277.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Van Lancker, Diana Roupas ; Kempler, Daniel. / Comprehension of familiar phrases by left- but not by right-hemisphere damaged patients. In: Brain and Language. 1987 ; Vol. 32, No. 2. pp. 265-277.
@article{cbf811b3c5c84f1690b7b104f7dddbf4,
title = "Comprehension of familiar phrases by left- but not by right-hemisphere damaged patients",
abstract = "Single words, familiar phrases (idioms and speech formulas), and novel sentences (matched to the familiar phrases in length, frequency, and structure) were selected for a picture-matching auditory comprehension task and administered to left- and right-brain damaged (LBD, RBD) subjects. The groups did not differ in single word comprehension. A 2 × 2 ANOVA revealed opposite patterns on the two other tasks, with LBD subjects performing worse on novel than familiar phrases, and RBD subject impaired on familiar phrase but not on novel sentence comprehension. The role of grammatical/referential vs. holistic/inferential meaning in left and right hemisphere function is discussed.",
author = "{Van Lancker}, {Diana Roupas} and Daniel Kempler",
year = "1987",
doi = "10.1016/0093-934X(87)90128-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "265--277",
journal = "Brain and Language",
issn = "0093-934X",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comprehension of familiar phrases by left- but not by right-hemisphere damaged patients

AU - Van Lancker, Diana Roupas

AU - Kempler, Daniel

PY - 1987

Y1 - 1987

N2 - Single words, familiar phrases (idioms and speech formulas), and novel sentences (matched to the familiar phrases in length, frequency, and structure) were selected for a picture-matching auditory comprehension task and administered to left- and right-brain damaged (LBD, RBD) subjects. The groups did not differ in single word comprehension. A 2 × 2 ANOVA revealed opposite patterns on the two other tasks, with LBD subjects performing worse on novel than familiar phrases, and RBD subject impaired on familiar phrase but not on novel sentence comprehension. The role of grammatical/referential vs. holistic/inferential meaning in left and right hemisphere function is discussed.

AB - Single words, familiar phrases (idioms and speech formulas), and novel sentences (matched to the familiar phrases in length, frequency, and structure) were selected for a picture-matching auditory comprehension task and administered to left- and right-brain damaged (LBD, RBD) subjects. The groups did not differ in single word comprehension. A 2 × 2 ANOVA revealed opposite patterns on the two other tasks, with LBD subjects performing worse on novel than familiar phrases, and RBD subject impaired on familiar phrase but not on novel sentence comprehension. The role of grammatical/referential vs. holistic/inferential meaning in left and right hemisphere function is discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023492606&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023492606&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0093-934X(87)90128-3

DO - 10.1016/0093-934X(87)90128-3

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 265

EP - 277

JO - Brain and Language

JF - Brain and Language

SN - 0093-934X

IS - 2

ER -