Compositional procedural content generation

Julian Togelius, Tróndur Justinussen, Anders Hartzen

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

    Abstract

    We consider the strengths and drawbacks of various procedural content generation methods, and how they could be combined to hybrid methods that retain the advantages and avoid the disadvantages of their constituent methods. One answer is composition, where one method is nestled inside another. As an example, we present a hybrid evolutionary-ASP dungeon generator.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Title of host publication3rd Workshop on Procedural Content Generation in Games, PCG 2012, Organized in Conjunction with the Foundations of Digital Games Conference, FDG 2012
    Pages66-69
    Number of pages4
    StatePublished - 2012
    Event3rd Workshop on Procedural Content Generation in Games, PCG 2012, Organized in Conjunction with the Foundations of Digital Games Conference, FDG 2012 - Raleigh, NC, United States
    Duration: May 29 2012Jun 1 2012

    Other

    Other3rd Workshop on Procedural Content Generation in Games, PCG 2012, Organized in Conjunction with the Foundations of Digital Games Conference, FDG 2012
    CountryUnited States
    CityRaleigh, NC
    Period5/29/126/1/12

    Fingerprint

    Chemical analysis

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design
    • Human-Computer Interaction
    • Software

    Cite this

    Togelius, J., Justinussen, T., & Hartzen, A. (2012). Compositional procedural content generation. In 3rd Workshop on Procedural Content Generation in Games, PCG 2012, Organized in Conjunction with the Foundations of Digital Games Conference, FDG 2012 (pp. 66-69)

    Compositional procedural content generation. / Togelius, Julian; Justinussen, Tróndur; Hartzen, Anders.

    3rd Workshop on Procedural Content Generation in Games, PCG 2012, Organized in Conjunction with the Foundations of Digital Games Conference, FDG 2012. 2012. p. 66-69.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

    Togelius, J, Justinussen, T & Hartzen, A 2012, Compositional procedural content generation. in 3rd Workshop on Procedural Content Generation in Games, PCG 2012, Organized in Conjunction with the Foundations of Digital Games Conference, FDG 2012. pp. 66-69, 3rd Workshop on Procedural Content Generation in Games, PCG 2012, Organized in Conjunction with the Foundations of Digital Games Conference, FDG 2012, Raleigh, NC, United States, 5/29/12.
    Togelius J, Justinussen T, Hartzen A. Compositional procedural content generation. In 3rd Workshop on Procedural Content Generation in Games, PCG 2012, Organized in Conjunction with the Foundations of Digital Games Conference, FDG 2012. 2012. p. 66-69
    Togelius, Julian ; Justinussen, Tróndur ; Hartzen, Anders. / Compositional procedural content generation. 3rd Workshop on Procedural Content Generation in Games, PCG 2012, Organized in Conjunction with the Foundations of Digital Games Conference, FDG 2012. 2012. pp. 66-69
    @inproceedings{ba8bb7b64f37415eb73942d823665263,
    title = "Compositional procedural content generation",
    abstract = "We consider the strengths and drawbacks of various procedural content generation methods, and how they could be combined to hybrid methods that retain the advantages and avoid the disadvantages of their constituent methods. One answer is composition, where one method is nestled inside another. As an example, we present a hybrid evolutionary-ASP dungeon generator.",
    author = "Julian Togelius and Tr{\'o}ndur Justinussen and Anders Hartzen",
    year = "2012",
    language = "English (US)",
    pages = "66--69",
    booktitle = "3rd Workshop on Procedural Content Generation in Games, PCG 2012, Organized in Conjunction with the Foundations of Digital Games Conference, FDG 2012",

    }

    TY - GEN

    T1 - Compositional procedural content generation

    AU - Togelius, Julian

    AU - Justinussen, Tróndur

    AU - Hartzen, Anders

    PY - 2012

    Y1 - 2012

    N2 - We consider the strengths and drawbacks of various procedural content generation methods, and how they could be combined to hybrid methods that retain the advantages and avoid the disadvantages of their constituent methods. One answer is composition, where one method is nestled inside another. As an example, we present a hybrid evolutionary-ASP dungeon generator.

    AB - We consider the strengths and drawbacks of various procedural content generation methods, and how they could be combined to hybrid methods that retain the advantages and avoid the disadvantages of their constituent methods. One answer is composition, where one method is nestled inside another. As an example, we present a hybrid evolutionary-ASP dungeon generator.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887703796&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84887703796&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Conference contribution

    AN - SCOPUS:84887703796

    SP - 66

    EP - 69

    BT - 3rd Workshop on Procedural Content Generation in Games, PCG 2012, Organized in Conjunction with the Foundations of Digital Games Conference, FDG 2012

    ER -