Composition of complex numbers: Delineating the computational role of the left anterior temporal lobe

Esti Blanco-Elorrieta, Liina Pylkkänen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

What is the neurobiological basis of our ability to create complex messages with language? Results from multiple methodologies have converged on a set of brain regions as relevant for this general process, but the computational details of these areas remain to be characterized. The left anterior temporal lobe (LATL) has been a consistent node within this network, with results suggesting that although it rather systematically shows increased activation for semantically complex structured stimuli, this effect does not extend to number phrases such as 'three books.' In the present work we used magnetoencephalography to investigate whether numbers in general are an invalid input to the combinatory operations housed in the LATL or whether the lack of LATL engagement for stimuli such as 'three books' is due to the quantificational nature of such phrases. As a relevant test case, we employed complex number terms such as 'twenty-three', where one number term is not a quantifier of the other but rather, the two terms form a type of complex concept. In a number naming paradigm, participants viewed rows of numbers and depending on task instruction, named them as complex number terms ('twenty-three'), numerical quantifications ('two threes'), adjectival modifications ('blue threes') or non-combinatory lists (e.g., 'two, three'). While quantificational phrases failed to engage the LATL as compared to non-combinatory controls, both complex number terms and adjectival modifications elicited a reliable activity increase in the LATL. Our results show that while the LATL does not participate in the enumeration of tokens within a set, exemplified by the quantificational phrases, it does support conceptual combination, including the composition of complex number concepts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)194-203
Number of pages10
JournalNeuroImage
Volume124
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

Temporal Lobe
Magnetoencephalography
Aptitude
Language
Brain

Keywords

  • Complex number composition
  • Conceptual combination
  • Left anterior temporal lobe
  • Magnetoencephalography
  • Numerical quantification

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

Composition of complex numbers : Delineating the computational role of the left anterior temporal lobe. / Blanco-Elorrieta, Esti; Pylkkänen, Liina.

In: NeuroImage, Vol. 124, 01.01.2016, p. 194-203.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3eb47dfab6974778a03011e3ee75d45c,
title = "Composition of complex numbers: Delineating the computational role of the left anterior temporal lobe",
abstract = "What is the neurobiological basis of our ability to create complex messages with language? Results from multiple methodologies have converged on a set of brain regions as relevant for this general process, but the computational details of these areas remain to be characterized. The left anterior temporal lobe (LATL) has been a consistent node within this network, with results suggesting that although it rather systematically shows increased activation for semantically complex structured stimuli, this effect does not extend to number phrases such as 'three books.' In the present work we used magnetoencephalography to investigate whether numbers in general are an invalid input to the combinatory operations housed in the LATL or whether the lack of LATL engagement for stimuli such as 'three books' is due to the quantificational nature of such phrases. As a relevant test case, we employed complex number terms such as 'twenty-three', where one number term is not a quantifier of the other but rather, the two terms form a type of complex concept. In a number naming paradigm, participants viewed rows of numbers and depending on task instruction, named them as complex number terms ('twenty-three'), numerical quantifications ('two threes'), adjectival modifications ('blue threes') or non-combinatory lists (e.g., 'two, three'). While quantificational phrases failed to engage the LATL as compared to non-combinatory controls, both complex number terms and adjectival modifications elicited a reliable activity increase in the LATL. Our results show that while the LATL does not participate in the enumeration of tokens within a set, exemplified by the quantificational phrases, it does support conceptual combination, including the composition of complex number concepts.",
keywords = "Complex number composition, Conceptual combination, Left anterior temporal lobe, Magnetoencephalography, Numerical quantification",
author = "Esti Blanco-Elorrieta and Liina Pylkk{\"a}nen",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.049",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "124",
pages = "194--203",
journal = "NeuroImage",
issn = "1053-8119",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Composition of complex numbers

T2 - Delineating the computational role of the left anterior temporal lobe

AU - Blanco-Elorrieta, Esti

AU - Pylkkänen, Liina

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - What is the neurobiological basis of our ability to create complex messages with language? Results from multiple methodologies have converged on a set of brain regions as relevant for this general process, but the computational details of these areas remain to be characterized. The left anterior temporal lobe (LATL) has been a consistent node within this network, with results suggesting that although it rather systematically shows increased activation for semantically complex structured stimuli, this effect does not extend to number phrases such as 'three books.' In the present work we used magnetoencephalography to investigate whether numbers in general are an invalid input to the combinatory operations housed in the LATL or whether the lack of LATL engagement for stimuli such as 'three books' is due to the quantificational nature of such phrases. As a relevant test case, we employed complex number terms such as 'twenty-three', where one number term is not a quantifier of the other but rather, the two terms form a type of complex concept. In a number naming paradigm, participants viewed rows of numbers and depending on task instruction, named them as complex number terms ('twenty-three'), numerical quantifications ('two threes'), adjectival modifications ('blue threes') or non-combinatory lists (e.g., 'two, three'). While quantificational phrases failed to engage the LATL as compared to non-combinatory controls, both complex number terms and adjectival modifications elicited a reliable activity increase in the LATL. Our results show that while the LATL does not participate in the enumeration of tokens within a set, exemplified by the quantificational phrases, it does support conceptual combination, including the composition of complex number concepts.

AB - What is the neurobiological basis of our ability to create complex messages with language? Results from multiple methodologies have converged on a set of brain regions as relevant for this general process, but the computational details of these areas remain to be characterized. The left anterior temporal lobe (LATL) has been a consistent node within this network, with results suggesting that although it rather systematically shows increased activation for semantically complex structured stimuli, this effect does not extend to number phrases such as 'three books.' In the present work we used magnetoencephalography to investigate whether numbers in general are an invalid input to the combinatory operations housed in the LATL or whether the lack of LATL engagement for stimuli such as 'three books' is due to the quantificational nature of such phrases. As a relevant test case, we employed complex number terms such as 'twenty-three', where one number term is not a quantifier of the other but rather, the two terms form a type of complex concept. In a number naming paradigm, participants viewed rows of numbers and depending on task instruction, named them as complex number terms ('twenty-three'), numerical quantifications ('two threes'), adjectival modifications ('blue threes') or non-combinatory lists (e.g., 'two, three'). While quantificational phrases failed to engage the LATL as compared to non-combinatory controls, both complex number terms and adjectival modifications elicited a reliable activity increase in the LATL. Our results show that while the LATL does not participate in the enumeration of tokens within a set, exemplified by the quantificational phrases, it does support conceptual combination, including the composition of complex number concepts.

KW - Complex number composition

KW - Conceptual combination

KW - Left anterior temporal lobe

KW - Magnetoencephalography

KW - Numerical quantification

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941991916&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84941991916&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.049

DO - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.049

M3 - Article

VL - 124

SP - 194

EP - 203

JO - NeuroImage

JF - NeuroImage

SN - 1053-8119

ER -