Composition and decomposition in nonmarital fertility

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Ermisch (2009) criticized Gray, Stockard, and Stone (2006), arguing that they incorrectly tested a model positing a nonlinear relationship between the nonmarital fertility ratio and the proportion of unmarried women. I identify a different problem, which is that even if this model were to hold for a particular population, it would not in general hold for subgroups of this population; likewise, were it to hold for subgroups, it would not hold for aggregations of these subgroups.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)209-210
Number of pages2
JournalDemography
Volume46
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009

Fingerprint

fertility
aggregation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Demography

Cite this

Composition and decomposition in nonmarital fertility. / Wu, Lawrence L.

In: Demography, Vol. 46, No. 1, 2009, p. 209-210.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6dbabcae9edf4722982f51c4b3686fba,
title = "Composition and decomposition in nonmarital fertility",
abstract = "Ermisch (2009) criticized Gray, Stockard, and Stone (2006), arguing that they incorrectly tested a model positing a nonlinear relationship between the nonmarital fertility ratio and the proportion of unmarried women. I identify a different problem, which is that even if this model were to hold for a particular population, it would not in general hold for subgroups of this population; likewise, were it to hold for subgroups, it would not hold for aggregations of these subgroups.",
author = "Wu, {Lawrence L.}",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1353/dem.0.0044",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "209--210",
journal = "Demography",
issn = "0070-3370",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Composition and decomposition in nonmarital fertility

AU - Wu, Lawrence L.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Ermisch (2009) criticized Gray, Stockard, and Stone (2006), arguing that they incorrectly tested a model positing a nonlinear relationship between the nonmarital fertility ratio and the proportion of unmarried women. I identify a different problem, which is that even if this model were to hold for a particular population, it would not in general hold for subgroups of this population; likewise, were it to hold for subgroups, it would not hold for aggregations of these subgroups.

AB - Ermisch (2009) criticized Gray, Stockard, and Stone (2006), arguing that they incorrectly tested a model positing a nonlinear relationship between the nonmarital fertility ratio and the proportion of unmarried women. I identify a different problem, which is that even if this model were to hold for a particular population, it would not in general hold for subgroups of this population; likewise, were it to hold for subgroups, it would not hold for aggregations of these subgroups.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=65449169566&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=65449169566&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1353/dem.0.0044

DO - 10.1353/dem.0.0044

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 209

EP - 210

JO - Demography

JF - Demography

SN - 0070-3370

IS - 1

ER -