Comparison of the marginal fit of pressable ceramic to metal ceramic restorations

Jason E. Holden, Gary Goldstein, Eugene L. Hittelman, Elizabeth A. Clark

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the marginal adaptation of a pressed ceramic material, when used with and without a metal substructure, to a traditional feldspathic porcelain-fused-to-metal restoration with a porcelain butt margin. Materials and Methods: A maxillary central incisor typodont tooth was prepared with a 1.5 mm 360° shoulder with rounded internal line angle, and 30 polyether impressions were made. Dies were poured in type IV dental stone, and 30 restorations were fabricated: 10 metal ceramic restorations (MCR) with porcelain butt joints, 10 pressed to metal restorations (PTM), and 10 all-ceramic restorations (PCR). All restorations were evaluated on their respective dies at 45× magnification using an Olympus SZX-12, measurements of the marginal openings were made, and ANOVA and Scheffé post hoc tests were used to evaluate the data. Results: The mean marginal opening was 72.2 ± 5.9 μm for MCR, 49.0 ± 5.9 μm for PTM, and 55.8 ± 5.9 μm for PCR. The post hoc tests showed that there was a statistical difference between the marginal adaptation of the PTM and MCR groups (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in marginal adaptation between the PTM and the PCR groups, or the PCR and the MCR groups. Conclusions: The PTM group demonstrated a smaller mean marginal opening than the MCR group. The mean marginal openings of all three groups were within a clinically acceptable range.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)645-648
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Prosthodontics
Volume18
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2009

Fingerprint

Metal Ceramic Alloys
Ceramics
Metals
Dental Porcelain
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Tooth
Incisor
Analysis of Variance
Joints

Keywords

  • All-ceramic
  • Crowns
  • Marginal fit
  • Marginal opening

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Comparison of the marginal fit of pressable ceramic to metal ceramic restorations. / Holden, Jason E.; Goldstein, Gary; Hittelman, Eugene L.; Clark, Elizabeth A.

In: Journal of Prosthodontics, Vol. 18, No. 8, 12.2009, p. 645-648.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Holden, Jason E. ; Goldstein, Gary ; Hittelman, Eugene L. ; Clark, Elizabeth A. / Comparison of the marginal fit of pressable ceramic to metal ceramic restorations. In: Journal of Prosthodontics. 2009 ; Vol. 18, No. 8. pp. 645-648.
@article{a50232efaa2a4e23b34b0ffa68203cc9,
title = "Comparison of the marginal fit of pressable ceramic to metal ceramic restorations",
abstract = "Purpose: The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the marginal adaptation of a pressed ceramic material, when used with and without a metal substructure, to a traditional feldspathic porcelain-fused-to-metal restoration with a porcelain butt margin. Materials and Methods: A maxillary central incisor typodont tooth was prepared with a 1.5 mm 360° shoulder with rounded internal line angle, and 30 polyether impressions were made. Dies were poured in type IV dental stone, and 30 restorations were fabricated: 10 metal ceramic restorations (MCR) with porcelain butt joints, 10 pressed to metal restorations (PTM), and 10 all-ceramic restorations (PCR). All restorations were evaluated on their respective dies at 45× magnification using an Olympus SZX-12, measurements of the marginal openings were made, and ANOVA and Scheff{\'e} post hoc tests were used to evaluate the data. Results: The mean marginal opening was 72.2 ± 5.9 μm for MCR, 49.0 ± 5.9 μm for PTM, and 55.8 ± 5.9 μm for PCR. The post hoc tests showed that there was a statistical difference between the marginal adaptation of the PTM and MCR groups (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in marginal adaptation between the PTM and the PCR groups, or the PCR and the MCR groups. Conclusions: The PTM group demonstrated a smaller mean marginal opening than the MCR group. The mean marginal openings of all three groups were within a clinically acceptable range.",
keywords = "All-ceramic, Crowns, Marginal fit, Marginal opening",
author = "Holden, {Jason E.} and Gary Goldstein and Hittelman, {Eugene L.} and Clark, {Elizabeth A.}",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00497.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "645--648",
journal = "Journal of Prosthodontics",
issn = "1059-941X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of the marginal fit of pressable ceramic to metal ceramic restorations

AU - Holden, Jason E.

AU - Goldstein, Gary

AU - Hittelman, Eugene L.

AU - Clark, Elizabeth A.

PY - 2009/12

Y1 - 2009/12

N2 - Purpose: The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the marginal adaptation of a pressed ceramic material, when used with and without a metal substructure, to a traditional feldspathic porcelain-fused-to-metal restoration with a porcelain butt margin. Materials and Methods: A maxillary central incisor typodont tooth was prepared with a 1.5 mm 360° shoulder with rounded internal line angle, and 30 polyether impressions were made. Dies were poured in type IV dental stone, and 30 restorations were fabricated: 10 metal ceramic restorations (MCR) with porcelain butt joints, 10 pressed to metal restorations (PTM), and 10 all-ceramic restorations (PCR). All restorations were evaluated on their respective dies at 45× magnification using an Olympus SZX-12, measurements of the marginal openings were made, and ANOVA and Scheffé post hoc tests were used to evaluate the data. Results: The mean marginal opening was 72.2 ± 5.9 μm for MCR, 49.0 ± 5.9 μm for PTM, and 55.8 ± 5.9 μm for PCR. The post hoc tests showed that there was a statistical difference between the marginal adaptation of the PTM and MCR groups (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in marginal adaptation between the PTM and the PCR groups, or the PCR and the MCR groups. Conclusions: The PTM group demonstrated a smaller mean marginal opening than the MCR group. The mean marginal openings of all three groups were within a clinically acceptable range.

AB - Purpose: The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the marginal adaptation of a pressed ceramic material, when used with and without a metal substructure, to a traditional feldspathic porcelain-fused-to-metal restoration with a porcelain butt margin. Materials and Methods: A maxillary central incisor typodont tooth was prepared with a 1.5 mm 360° shoulder with rounded internal line angle, and 30 polyether impressions were made. Dies were poured in type IV dental stone, and 30 restorations were fabricated: 10 metal ceramic restorations (MCR) with porcelain butt joints, 10 pressed to metal restorations (PTM), and 10 all-ceramic restorations (PCR). All restorations were evaluated on their respective dies at 45× magnification using an Olympus SZX-12, measurements of the marginal openings were made, and ANOVA and Scheffé post hoc tests were used to evaluate the data. Results: The mean marginal opening was 72.2 ± 5.9 μm for MCR, 49.0 ± 5.9 μm for PTM, and 55.8 ± 5.9 μm for PCR. The post hoc tests showed that there was a statistical difference between the marginal adaptation of the PTM and MCR groups (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in marginal adaptation between the PTM and the PCR groups, or the PCR and the MCR groups. Conclusions: The PTM group demonstrated a smaller mean marginal opening than the MCR group. The mean marginal openings of all three groups were within a clinically acceptable range.

KW - All-ceramic

KW - Crowns

KW - Marginal fit

KW - Marginal opening

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=71549169261&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=71549169261&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00497.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00497.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 19682215

AN - SCOPUS:71549169261

VL - 18

SP - 645

EP - 648

JO - Journal of Prosthodontics

JF - Journal of Prosthodontics

SN - 1059-941X

IS - 8

ER -