Comparison of the intrinsic parameters (A, B, and S) of a forward osmosis membrane using pressurized and non-pressurized methods

S. N.S.A. Aziz, A. F.H.A. Rahman, M. N. Abu Seman, Nidal Hilal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Generally, forward osmosis (FO) membrane performance is defined based on its intrinsic parameters, namely the water permeability (A), solute permeability (B), and structural parameter (S). This study was conducted to examine the performance of the commercial membrane NF2 in an FO system and to validate and compare the intrinsic value of A, B, and S obtained by single stage-stage and two-stage methods. The NF2 membrane was unable to demonstrate a good configuration for an FO membrane due to its membrane structure. Comparing the two different orientations in the single-stage method, it appears that both orientations display distinct sets of intrinsic values for the same membrane type. A comparison on the two-stage methods between the pressure-retarded osmosis-FO and reverse osmosis (RO)-FO methods reveals a new standard for the two-stage methods where higher fluxes must be produced from the first stage in order to attain an accurate value of S at the second stage. Additionally, the RO-FO methods were found to be not relevant for testing the ability of a membrane for FO application due to the hydraulic pressure involved during the compaction procedure. The two-stage method with proposed new standards can be the ideal testing procedure for the membrane in FO applications. This is because all the intrinsic values can be separately determined considering all the possible concentration polarization that might occur with both orientations compared with the attempts of fitting all possible values in the generated equations, as in single-stage methods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)14-23
Number of pages10
JournalDesalination and Water Treatment
Volume129
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2018

Fingerprint

Osmosis membranes
Osmosis
osmosis
membrane
Membranes
Reverse osmosis
Membrane structures
permeability
Testing
comparison
method
parameter
Compaction
Hydraulics
Polarization
Fluxes
solute
compaction
polarization
hydraulics

Keywords

  • Concentration polarization
  • Forward osmosis
  • Iintrinsic parameters
  • Single-stage method
  • Two-stage method

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Water Science and Technology
  • Ocean Engineering
  • Pollution

Cite this

Comparison of the intrinsic parameters (A, B, and S) of a forward osmosis membrane using pressurized and non-pressurized methods. / Aziz, S. N.S.A.; Rahman, A. F.H.A.; Abu Seman, M. N.; Hilal, Nidal.

In: Desalination and Water Treatment, Vol. 129, 01.10.2018, p. 14-23.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{78424272176d434995a593da5662f375,
title = "Comparison of the intrinsic parameters (A, B, and S) of a forward osmosis membrane using pressurized and non-pressurized methods",
abstract = "Generally, forward osmosis (FO) membrane performance is defined based on its intrinsic parameters, namely the water permeability (A), solute permeability (B), and structural parameter (S). This study was conducted to examine the performance of the commercial membrane NF2 in an FO system and to validate and compare the intrinsic value of A, B, and S obtained by single stage-stage and two-stage methods. The NF2 membrane was unable to demonstrate a good configuration for an FO membrane due to its membrane structure. Comparing the two different orientations in the single-stage method, it appears that both orientations display distinct sets of intrinsic values for the same membrane type. A comparison on the two-stage methods between the pressure-retarded osmosis-FO and reverse osmosis (RO)-FO methods reveals a new standard for the two-stage methods where higher fluxes must be produced from the first stage in order to attain an accurate value of S at the second stage. Additionally, the RO-FO methods were found to be not relevant for testing the ability of a membrane for FO application due to the hydraulic pressure involved during the compaction procedure. The two-stage method with proposed new standards can be the ideal testing procedure for the membrane in FO applications. This is because all the intrinsic values can be separately determined considering all the possible concentration polarization that might occur with both orientations compared with the attempts of fitting all possible values in the generated equations, as in single-stage methods.",
keywords = "Concentration polarization, Forward osmosis, Iintrinsic parameters, Single-stage method, Two-stage method",
author = "Aziz, {S. N.S.A.} and Rahman, {A. F.H.A.} and {Abu Seman}, {M. N.} and Nidal Hilal",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5004/dwt.2018.22811",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "129",
pages = "14--23",
journal = "Desalination and Water Treatment",
issn = "1944-3994",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of the intrinsic parameters (A, B, and S) of a forward osmosis membrane using pressurized and non-pressurized methods

AU - Aziz, S. N.S.A.

AU - Rahman, A. F.H.A.

AU - Abu Seman, M. N.

AU - Hilal, Nidal

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - Generally, forward osmosis (FO) membrane performance is defined based on its intrinsic parameters, namely the water permeability (A), solute permeability (B), and structural parameter (S). This study was conducted to examine the performance of the commercial membrane NF2 in an FO system and to validate and compare the intrinsic value of A, B, and S obtained by single stage-stage and two-stage methods. The NF2 membrane was unable to demonstrate a good configuration for an FO membrane due to its membrane structure. Comparing the two different orientations in the single-stage method, it appears that both orientations display distinct sets of intrinsic values for the same membrane type. A comparison on the two-stage methods between the pressure-retarded osmosis-FO and reverse osmosis (RO)-FO methods reveals a new standard for the two-stage methods where higher fluxes must be produced from the first stage in order to attain an accurate value of S at the second stage. Additionally, the RO-FO methods were found to be not relevant for testing the ability of a membrane for FO application due to the hydraulic pressure involved during the compaction procedure. The two-stage method with proposed new standards can be the ideal testing procedure for the membrane in FO applications. This is because all the intrinsic values can be separately determined considering all the possible concentration polarization that might occur with both orientations compared with the attempts of fitting all possible values in the generated equations, as in single-stage methods.

AB - Generally, forward osmosis (FO) membrane performance is defined based on its intrinsic parameters, namely the water permeability (A), solute permeability (B), and structural parameter (S). This study was conducted to examine the performance of the commercial membrane NF2 in an FO system and to validate and compare the intrinsic value of A, B, and S obtained by single stage-stage and two-stage methods. The NF2 membrane was unable to demonstrate a good configuration for an FO membrane due to its membrane structure. Comparing the two different orientations in the single-stage method, it appears that both orientations display distinct sets of intrinsic values for the same membrane type. A comparison on the two-stage methods between the pressure-retarded osmosis-FO and reverse osmosis (RO)-FO methods reveals a new standard for the two-stage methods where higher fluxes must be produced from the first stage in order to attain an accurate value of S at the second stage. Additionally, the RO-FO methods were found to be not relevant for testing the ability of a membrane for FO application due to the hydraulic pressure involved during the compaction procedure. The two-stage method with proposed new standards can be the ideal testing procedure for the membrane in FO applications. This is because all the intrinsic values can be separately determined considering all the possible concentration polarization that might occur with both orientations compared with the attempts of fitting all possible values in the generated equations, as in single-stage methods.

KW - Concentration polarization

KW - Forward osmosis

KW - Iintrinsic parameters

KW - Single-stage method

KW - Two-stage method

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056254024&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056254024&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5004/dwt.2018.22811

DO - 10.5004/dwt.2018.22811

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85056254024

VL - 129

SP - 14

EP - 23

JO - Desalination and Water Treatment

JF - Desalination and Water Treatment

SN - 1944-3994

ER -