Comparison of cell migration mechanical strategies in three-dimensional matrices

A computational study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Cell migration on a two-dimensional flat surface has been extensively studied and is generally characterized by a front-protrusion–rearcontraction process. In a three-dimensional (3D) environment, on the other hand, cells adopt multiple migration strategies depending on the cell type and the properties of the extracellular matrix (ECM). By using computer simulations, we find that these migration strategies can be classified by various spatial–temporal dynamics of actin protrusion, actin–myosin contraction and actin–ECM adhesion. We demonstrate that if we include or exclude proteolysis of ECM, and vary adhesion dynamics and spatial distributions of protrusion, contraction and adhesion, our model can reproduce six experimentally observed motility modes: mesenchymal, chimneying, amoeboid, blebbing, finger-like protrusion and rear-squeezing cell locomotory behaviours. We further find that the mode of the cell motility evolves in response to the ECM density and adhesion detachment rate. The model makes non-trivial predictions about cell speed as a function of the adhesion strength, and ECM elasticity and mesh size.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalInterface Focus
Volume6
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 6 2016

Fingerprint

Cell Movement
Extracellular Matrix
Adhesion
Proteolysis
Bond strength (materials)
Elasticity
Blister
Computer Simulation
Spatial distribution
Actins
Computer simulation

Keywords

  • Cell mechanics
  • Cell migration
  • Computational model
  • Three-dimensional

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Biotechnology
  • Biochemistry
  • Bioengineering
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Biomaterials

Cite this

Comparison of cell migration mechanical strategies in three-dimensional matrices : A computational study. / Zhu, Jie; Mogilner, Alexander.

In: Interface Focus, Vol. 6, No. 5, 06.10.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5e7a44c0327141c9af5ebfc2cdc2f55a,
title = "Comparison of cell migration mechanical strategies in three-dimensional matrices: A computational study",
abstract = "Cell migration on a two-dimensional flat surface has been extensively studied and is generally characterized by a front-protrusion–rearcontraction process. In a three-dimensional (3D) environment, on the other hand, cells adopt multiple migration strategies depending on the cell type and the properties of the extracellular matrix (ECM). By using computer simulations, we find that these migration strategies can be classified by various spatial–temporal dynamics of actin protrusion, actin–myosin contraction and actin–ECM adhesion. We demonstrate that if we include or exclude proteolysis of ECM, and vary adhesion dynamics and spatial distributions of protrusion, contraction and adhesion, our model can reproduce six experimentally observed motility modes: mesenchymal, chimneying, amoeboid, blebbing, finger-like protrusion and rear-squeezing cell locomotory behaviours. We further find that the mode of the cell motility evolves in response to the ECM density and adhesion detachment rate. The model makes non-trivial predictions about cell speed as a function of the adhesion strength, and ECM elasticity and mesh size.",
keywords = "Cell mechanics, Cell migration, Computational model, Three-dimensional",
author = "Jie Zhu and Alexander Mogilner",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1098/rsfs.2016.0040",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
journal = "Interface Focus",
issn = "2042-8898",
publisher = "Royal Society Publishing",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of cell migration mechanical strategies in three-dimensional matrices

T2 - A computational study

AU - Zhu, Jie

AU - Mogilner, Alexander

PY - 2016/10/6

Y1 - 2016/10/6

N2 - Cell migration on a two-dimensional flat surface has been extensively studied and is generally characterized by a front-protrusion–rearcontraction process. In a three-dimensional (3D) environment, on the other hand, cells adopt multiple migration strategies depending on the cell type and the properties of the extracellular matrix (ECM). By using computer simulations, we find that these migration strategies can be classified by various spatial–temporal dynamics of actin protrusion, actin–myosin contraction and actin–ECM adhesion. We demonstrate that if we include or exclude proteolysis of ECM, and vary adhesion dynamics and spatial distributions of protrusion, contraction and adhesion, our model can reproduce six experimentally observed motility modes: mesenchymal, chimneying, amoeboid, blebbing, finger-like protrusion and rear-squeezing cell locomotory behaviours. We further find that the mode of the cell motility evolves in response to the ECM density and adhesion detachment rate. The model makes non-trivial predictions about cell speed as a function of the adhesion strength, and ECM elasticity and mesh size.

AB - Cell migration on a two-dimensional flat surface has been extensively studied and is generally characterized by a front-protrusion–rearcontraction process. In a three-dimensional (3D) environment, on the other hand, cells adopt multiple migration strategies depending on the cell type and the properties of the extracellular matrix (ECM). By using computer simulations, we find that these migration strategies can be classified by various spatial–temporal dynamics of actin protrusion, actin–myosin contraction and actin–ECM adhesion. We demonstrate that if we include or exclude proteolysis of ECM, and vary adhesion dynamics and spatial distributions of protrusion, contraction and adhesion, our model can reproduce six experimentally observed motility modes: mesenchymal, chimneying, amoeboid, blebbing, finger-like protrusion and rear-squeezing cell locomotory behaviours. We further find that the mode of the cell motility evolves in response to the ECM density and adhesion detachment rate. The model makes non-trivial predictions about cell speed as a function of the adhesion strength, and ECM elasticity and mesh size.

KW - Cell mechanics

KW - Cell migration

KW - Computational model

KW - Three-dimensional

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983443018&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84983443018&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1098/rsfs.2016.0040

DO - 10.1098/rsfs.2016.0040

M3 - Article

VL - 6

JO - Interface Focus

JF - Interface Focus

SN - 2042-8898

IS - 5

ER -