Comparison between two- And three-dimensional scoring of zebrafish response to psychoactive drugs: Identifying when three-dimensional analysis is needed

Simone MacRì, Romain J.G. Clément, Chiara Spinello, Maurizio Porfiri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Zebrafish (Danio rerio) have recently emerged as a valuable laboratory species in the field of behavioral pharmacology, where they afford rapid and precise high-throughput drug screening. Although the behavioral repertoire of this species manifests along three-dimensional (3D), most of the efforts in behavioral pharmacology rely on two-dimensional (2D) projections acquired from a single overhead or front camera. We recently showed that, compared to a 3D scoring approach, 2D analyses could lead to inaccurate claims regarding individual and social behavior of drug-free experimental subjects. Here, we examined whether this conclusion extended to the field of behavioral pharmacology by phenotyping adult zebrafish, acutely exposed to citalopram (30, 50, and 100 mg/L) or ethanol (0.25%, 0.50%, and 1.00%), in the novel tank diving test over a 6-min experimental session. We observed that both compounds modulated the time course of general locomotion and anxiety-related profiles, the latter being represented by specific behaviors (erratic movements and freezing) and avoidance of anxiety-eliciting areas of the test tank (top half and distance from the side walls). We observed that 2D projections of 3D trajectories (ground truth data) may introduce a source of unwanted variation in zebrafish behavioral phenotyping. Predictably, both 2D views underestimate absolute levels of general locomotion. Additionally, while data obtained from a camera positioned on top of the experimental tank are similar to those obtained from a 3D reconstruction, 2D front view data yield false negative findings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number7893
JournalPeerJ
Volume2019
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Psychotropic Drugs
Zebrafish
Danio rerio
pharmacology
Cameras
Citalopram
Pharmacology
Locomotion
anxiety
Freezing
cameras
Pharmaceutical Preparations
locomotion
Screening
Ethanol
Anxiety
Trajectories
Throughput
phenotype
drugs

Keywords

  • Anxiety
  • Automated tracking
  • Citalopram
  • Ethanol
  • Novel tank diving test

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Comparison between two- And three-dimensional scoring of zebrafish response to psychoactive drugs : Identifying when three-dimensional analysis is needed. / MacRì, Simone; Clément, Romain J.G.; Spinello, Chiara; Porfiri, Maurizio.

In: PeerJ, Vol. 2019, No. 10, 7893, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{29cde7faeb8249f7aaccbbe91109c35c,
title = "Comparison between two- And three-dimensional scoring of zebrafish response to psychoactive drugs: Identifying when three-dimensional analysis is needed",
abstract = "Zebrafish (Danio rerio) have recently emerged as a valuable laboratory species in the field of behavioral pharmacology, where they afford rapid and precise high-throughput drug screening. Although the behavioral repertoire of this species manifests along three-dimensional (3D), most of the efforts in behavioral pharmacology rely on two-dimensional (2D) projections acquired from a single overhead or front camera. We recently showed that, compared to a 3D scoring approach, 2D analyses could lead to inaccurate claims regarding individual and social behavior of drug-free experimental subjects. Here, we examined whether this conclusion extended to the field of behavioral pharmacology by phenotyping adult zebrafish, acutely exposed to citalopram (30, 50, and 100 mg/L) or ethanol (0.25{\%}, 0.50{\%}, and 1.00{\%}), in the novel tank diving test over a 6-min experimental session. We observed that both compounds modulated the time course of general locomotion and anxiety-related profiles, the latter being represented by specific behaviors (erratic movements and freezing) and avoidance of anxiety-eliciting areas of the test tank (top half and distance from the side walls). We observed that 2D projections of 3D trajectories (ground truth data) may introduce a source of unwanted variation in zebrafish behavioral phenotyping. Predictably, both 2D views underestimate absolute levels of general locomotion. Additionally, while data obtained from a camera positioned on top of the experimental tank are similar to those obtained from a 3D reconstruction, 2D front view data yield false negative findings.",
keywords = "Anxiety, Automated tracking, Citalopram, Ethanol, Novel tank diving test",
author = "Simone MacR{\`i} and Cl{\'e}ment, {Romain J.G.} and Chiara Spinello and Maurizio Porfiri",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.7717/peerj.7893",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2019",
journal = "PeerJ",
issn = "2167-8359",
publisher = "PeerJ",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison between two- And three-dimensional scoring of zebrafish response to psychoactive drugs

T2 - Identifying when three-dimensional analysis is needed

AU - MacRì, Simone

AU - Clément, Romain J.G.

AU - Spinello, Chiara

AU - Porfiri, Maurizio

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Zebrafish (Danio rerio) have recently emerged as a valuable laboratory species in the field of behavioral pharmacology, where they afford rapid and precise high-throughput drug screening. Although the behavioral repertoire of this species manifests along three-dimensional (3D), most of the efforts in behavioral pharmacology rely on two-dimensional (2D) projections acquired from a single overhead or front camera. We recently showed that, compared to a 3D scoring approach, 2D analyses could lead to inaccurate claims regarding individual and social behavior of drug-free experimental subjects. Here, we examined whether this conclusion extended to the field of behavioral pharmacology by phenotyping adult zebrafish, acutely exposed to citalopram (30, 50, and 100 mg/L) or ethanol (0.25%, 0.50%, and 1.00%), in the novel tank diving test over a 6-min experimental session. We observed that both compounds modulated the time course of general locomotion and anxiety-related profiles, the latter being represented by specific behaviors (erratic movements and freezing) and avoidance of anxiety-eliciting areas of the test tank (top half and distance from the side walls). We observed that 2D projections of 3D trajectories (ground truth data) may introduce a source of unwanted variation in zebrafish behavioral phenotyping. Predictably, both 2D views underestimate absolute levels of general locomotion. Additionally, while data obtained from a camera positioned on top of the experimental tank are similar to those obtained from a 3D reconstruction, 2D front view data yield false negative findings.

AB - Zebrafish (Danio rerio) have recently emerged as a valuable laboratory species in the field of behavioral pharmacology, where they afford rapid and precise high-throughput drug screening. Although the behavioral repertoire of this species manifests along three-dimensional (3D), most of the efforts in behavioral pharmacology rely on two-dimensional (2D) projections acquired from a single overhead or front camera. We recently showed that, compared to a 3D scoring approach, 2D analyses could lead to inaccurate claims regarding individual and social behavior of drug-free experimental subjects. Here, we examined whether this conclusion extended to the field of behavioral pharmacology by phenotyping adult zebrafish, acutely exposed to citalopram (30, 50, and 100 mg/L) or ethanol (0.25%, 0.50%, and 1.00%), in the novel tank diving test over a 6-min experimental session. We observed that both compounds modulated the time course of general locomotion and anxiety-related profiles, the latter being represented by specific behaviors (erratic movements and freezing) and avoidance of anxiety-eliciting areas of the test tank (top half and distance from the side walls). We observed that 2D projections of 3D trajectories (ground truth data) may introduce a source of unwanted variation in zebrafish behavioral phenotyping. Predictably, both 2D views underestimate absolute levels of general locomotion. Additionally, while data obtained from a camera positioned on top of the experimental tank are similar to those obtained from a 3D reconstruction, 2D front view data yield false negative findings.

KW - Anxiety

KW - Automated tracking

KW - Citalopram

KW - Ethanol

KW - Novel tank diving test

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074302439&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074302439&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7717/peerj.7893

DO - 10.7717/peerj.7893

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85074302439

VL - 2019

JO - PeerJ

JF - PeerJ

SN - 2167-8359

IS - 10

M1 - 7893

ER -