Comparing the T and \pi equivalent circuits for the calculation of transformer inrush currents

Francisco De Leon, Ashkan Farazmand, Pekir Joseph

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The most commonly used equivalent circuit for transformers is the traditional (Steinmetz) T-equivalent proposed toward the end of the 19th century. This model has two leakage impedance branches and one magnetizing branch. The T model properly represents the terminal behavior of the transformer for most low-frequency operating conditions. Another model derived from the principle of duality between magnetic and electric circuits exists, the \pi equivalent circuit, which has two magnetizing branches and one leakage branch. This paper shows that while the two equivalent circuits provide the same accuracy in steady state, better accuracy for the calculation of inrush currents is obtained with the \pi -equivalent circuit. Laboratory tests performed on three transformers with different characteristics demonstrate that inrush current simulations with the T equivalent circuit can have errors up to 73%, while the \pi equivalent estimates the measurements in every case within a few percent.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number6287619
Pages (from-to)2390-2398
Number of pages9
JournalIEEE Transactions on Power Delivery
Volume27
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Electric instrument transformers
Equivalent circuits
Magnetic circuits
Networks (circuits)

Keywords

  • Duality
  • inrush currents
  • transformer equivalent circuits
  • transformer modeling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology

Cite this

Comparing the T and \pi equivalent circuits for the calculation of transformer inrush currents. / De Leon, Francisco; Farazmand, Ashkan; Joseph, Pekir.

In: IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol. 27, No. 4, 6287619, 2012, p. 2390-2398.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e40eba4178f34bcc9e7dfdcde9a21413,
title = "Comparing the T and \pi equivalent circuits for the calculation of transformer inrush currents",
abstract = "The most commonly used equivalent circuit for transformers is the traditional (Steinmetz) T-equivalent proposed toward the end of the 19th century. This model has two leakage impedance branches and one magnetizing branch. The T model properly represents the terminal behavior of the transformer for most low-frequency operating conditions. Another model derived from the principle of duality between magnetic and electric circuits exists, the \pi equivalent circuit, which has two magnetizing branches and one leakage branch. This paper shows that while the two equivalent circuits provide the same accuracy in steady state, better accuracy for the calculation of inrush currents is obtained with the \pi -equivalent circuit. Laboratory tests performed on three transformers with different characteristics demonstrate that inrush current simulations with the T equivalent circuit can have errors up to 73{\%}, while the \pi equivalent estimates the measurements in every case within a few percent.",
keywords = "Duality, inrush currents, transformer equivalent circuits, transformer modeling",
author = "{De Leon}, Francisco and Ashkan Farazmand and Pekir Joseph",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1109/TPWRD.2012.2208229",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "2390--2398",
journal = "IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery",
issn = "0885-8977",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing the T and \pi equivalent circuits for the calculation of transformer inrush currents

AU - De Leon, Francisco

AU - Farazmand, Ashkan

AU - Joseph, Pekir

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - The most commonly used equivalent circuit for transformers is the traditional (Steinmetz) T-equivalent proposed toward the end of the 19th century. This model has two leakage impedance branches and one magnetizing branch. The T model properly represents the terminal behavior of the transformer for most low-frequency operating conditions. Another model derived from the principle of duality between magnetic and electric circuits exists, the \pi equivalent circuit, which has two magnetizing branches and one leakage branch. This paper shows that while the two equivalent circuits provide the same accuracy in steady state, better accuracy for the calculation of inrush currents is obtained with the \pi -equivalent circuit. Laboratory tests performed on three transformers with different characteristics demonstrate that inrush current simulations with the T equivalent circuit can have errors up to 73%, while the \pi equivalent estimates the measurements in every case within a few percent.

AB - The most commonly used equivalent circuit for transformers is the traditional (Steinmetz) T-equivalent proposed toward the end of the 19th century. This model has two leakage impedance branches and one magnetizing branch. The T model properly represents the terminal behavior of the transformer for most low-frequency operating conditions. Another model derived from the principle of duality between magnetic and electric circuits exists, the \pi equivalent circuit, which has two magnetizing branches and one leakage branch. This paper shows that while the two equivalent circuits provide the same accuracy in steady state, better accuracy for the calculation of inrush currents is obtained with the \pi -equivalent circuit. Laboratory tests performed on three transformers with different characteristics demonstrate that inrush current simulations with the T equivalent circuit can have errors up to 73%, while the \pi equivalent estimates the measurements in every case within a few percent.

KW - Duality

KW - inrush currents

KW - transformer equivalent circuits

KW - transformer modeling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866734942&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866734942&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/TPWRD.2012.2208229

DO - 10.1109/TPWRD.2012.2208229

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84866734942

VL - 27

SP - 2390

EP - 2398

JO - IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery

JF - IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery

SN - 0885-8977

IS - 4

M1 - 6287619

ER -