Comparing policies across US drug markets

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

In democracies, drug policy is shaped by expectations of problems as well as by public preferences and political realities. As public preferences shift, so too will the systems of control. But systems of control have their own costs. There are the costs of maintaining the regulatory system, the costs of the black markets that emerge in response to the regulation, the costs of criminalizing behavior of otherwise law-abiding citizens, and the costs of forgone liberties. Some markets, such as heroin, are entirely prohibited. In contrast, in states that have legalized recreational marijuana in the United States, the focus is on product safety and reducing problem use and youth access, with targeted regulation and taxation. Some harmful substances are permitted under the ordinary regulations that apply to any sort of commerce (such as sugar) or with special regulation and taxes (such as alcohol). The relative social costs and benefits of systems of control are hard to assess, and these calculations are rarely performed. The challenge is in designing a system that does less harm than the harmful behavior it targets.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationDual Markets
Subtitle of host publicationComparative Approaches to Regulation
PublisherSpringer International Publishing
Pages181-190
Number of pages10
ISBN (Electronic)9783319653617
ISBN (Print)9783319653600
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 14 2017

Fingerprint

drug
Costs and Cost Analysis
market
regulation
costs
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Taxes
black market
Democracy
drug policy
social benefits
Heroin
social costs
Cannabis
taxation
commerce
Cost-Benefit Analysis
taxes
alcohol
Alcohols

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Hawken, A. (2017). Comparing policies across US drug markets. In Dual Markets: Comparative Approaches to Regulation (pp. 181-190). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65361-7_11

Comparing policies across US drug markets. / Hawken, Angela.

Dual Markets: Comparative Approaches to Regulation. Springer International Publishing, 2017. p. 181-190.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Hawken, A 2017, Comparing policies across US drug markets. in Dual Markets: Comparative Approaches to Regulation. Springer International Publishing, pp. 181-190. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65361-7_11
Hawken A. Comparing policies across US drug markets. In Dual Markets: Comparative Approaches to Regulation. Springer International Publishing. 2017. p. 181-190 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65361-7_11
Hawken, Angela. / Comparing policies across US drug markets. Dual Markets: Comparative Approaches to Regulation. Springer International Publishing, 2017. pp. 181-190
@inbook{47441e5f6c53476fb76562f6291d0019,
title = "Comparing policies across US drug markets",
abstract = "In democracies, drug policy is shaped by expectations of problems as well as by public preferences and political realities. As public preferences shift, so too will the systems of control. But systems of control have their own costs. There are the costs of maintaining the regulatory system, the costs of the black markets that emerge in response to the regulation, the costs of criminalizing behavior of otherwise law-abiding citizens, and the costs of forgone liberties. Some markets, such as heroin, are entirely prohibited. In contrast, in states that have legalized recreational marijuana in the United States, the focus is on product safety and reducing problem use and youth access, with targeted regulation and taxation. Some harmful substances are permitted under the ordinary regulations that apply to any sort of commerce (such as sugar) or with special regulation and taxes (such as alcohol). The relative social costs and benefits of systems of control are hard to assess, and these calculations are rarely performed. The challenge is in designing a system that does less harm than the harmful behavior it targets.",
author = "Angela Hawken",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-65361-7_11",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9783319653600",
pages = "181--190",
booktitle = "Dual Markets",
publisher = "Springer International Publishing",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Comparing policies across US drug markets

AU - Hawken, Angela

PY - 2017/11/14

Y1 - 2017/11/14

N2 - In democracies, drug policy is shaped by expectations of problems as well as by public preferences and political realities. As public preferences shift, so too will the systems of control. But systems of control have their own costs. There are the costs of maintaining the regulatory system, the costs of the black markets that emerge in response to the regulation, the costs of criminalizing behavior of otherwise law-abiding citizens, and the costs of forgone liberties. Some markets, such as heroin, are entirely prohibited. In contrast, in states that have legalized recreational marijuana in the United States, the focus is on product safety and reducing problem use and youth access, with targeted regulation and taxation. Some harmful substances are permitted under the ordinary regulations that apply to any sort of commerce (such as sugar) or with special regulation and taxes (such as alcohol). The relative social costs and benefits of systems of control are hard to assess, and these calculations are rarely performed. The challenge is in designing a system that does less harm than the harmful behavior it targets.

AB - In democracies, drug policy is shaped by expectations of problems as well as by public preferences and political realities. As public preferences shift, so too will the systems of control. But systems of control have their own costs. There are the costs of maintaining the regulatory system, the costs of the black markets that emerge in response to the regulation, the costs of criminalizing behavior of otherwise law-abiding citizens, and the costs of forgone liberties. Some markets, such as heroin, are entirely prohibited. In contrast, in states that have legalized recreational marijuana in the United States, the focus is on product safety and reducing problem use and youth access, with targeted regulation and taxation. Some harmful substances are permitted under the ordinary regulations that apply to any sort of commerce (such as sugar) or with special regulation and taxes (such as alcohol). The relative social costs and benefits of systems of control are hard to assess, and these calculations are rarely performed. The challenge is in designing a system that does less harm than the harmful behavior it targets.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043807072&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85043807072&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-65361-7_11

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-65361-7_11

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9783319653600

SP - 181

EP - 190

BT - Dual Markets

PB - Springer International Publishing

ER -