Comparing integrate-and-fire models estimated using intracellular and extracellular data

Liam Paninski, Jonathan Pillow, Eero Simoncelli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We have recently developed a maximum-likelihood (ML) method for estimating integrate-and-fire-based stimulus encoding models that can be used even when only extracellular spike train data is available. Here we derive the ML estimator given the full intracellular voltage trace and apply both the extracellular-only and intracellular method to responses recorded in vitro, allowing a direct comparison of the model fits within a unified statistical framework. Both models are able to capture the behavior of these cells under dynamic stimulus conditions to a high degree of temporal precision, although we observe significant differences in the stochastic behavior of the two models.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)379-385
Number of pages7
JournalNeurocomputing
Volume65-66
Issue numberSPEC. ISS.
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2005

Fingerprint

Maximum likelihood
Fires
Cells
Electric potential
In Vitro Techniques

Keywords

  • Integrate-and-fire
  • Noise
  • Stimulus-response encoding

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

Cite this

Comparing integrate-and-fire models estimated using intracellular and extracellular data. / Paninski, Liam; Pillow, Jonathan; Simoncelli, Eero.

In: Neurocomputing, Vol. 65-66, No. SPEC. ISS., 06.2005, p. 379-385.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Paninski, Liam ; Pillow, Jonathan ; Simoncelli, Eero. / Comparing integrate-and-fire models estimated using intracellular and extracellular data. In: Neurocomputing. 2005 ; Vol. 65-66, No. SPEC. ISS. pp. 379-385.
@article{ac36d6af0ca843d0b5b2892e37cf2ad2,
title = "Comparing integrate-and-fire models estimated using intracellular and extracellular data",
abstract = "We have recently developed a maximum-likelihood (ML) method for estimating integrate-and-fire-based stimulus encoding models that can be used even when only extracellular spike train data is available. Here we derive the ML estimator given the full intracellular voltage trace and apply both the extracellular-only and intracellular method to responses recorded in vitro, allowing a direct comparison of the model fits within a unified statistical framework. Both models are able to capture the behavior of these cells under dynamic stimulus conditions to a high degree of temporal precision, although we observe significant differences in the stochastic behavior of the two models.",
keywords = "Integrate-and-fire, Noise, Stimulus-response encoding",
author = "Liam Paninski and Jonathan Pillow and Eero Simoncelli",
year = "2005",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.neucom.2004.10.032",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "65-66",
pages = "379--385",
journal = "Neurocomputing",
issn = "0925-2312",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "SPEC. ISS.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing integrate-and-fire models estimated using intracellular and extracellular data

AU - Paninski, Liam

AU - Pillow, Jonathan

AU - Simoncelli, Eero

PY - 2005/6

Y1 - 2005/6

N2 - We have recently developed a maximum-likelihood (ML) method for estimating integrate-and-fire-based stimulus encoding models that can be used even when only extracellular spike train data is available. Here we derive the ML estimator given the full intracellular voltage trace and apply both the extracellular-only and intracellular method to responses recorded in vitro, allowing a direct comparison of the model fits within a unified statistical framework. Both models are able to capture the behavior of these cells under dynamic stimulus conditions to a high degree of temporal precision, although we observe significant differences in the stochastic behavior of the two models.

AB - We have recently developed a maximum-likelihood (ML) method for estimating integrate-and-fire-based stimulus encoding models that can be used even when only extracellular spike train data is available. Here we derive the ML estimator given the full intracellular voltage trace and apply both the extracellular-only and intracellular method to responses recorded in vitro, allowing a direct comparison of the model fits within a unified statistical framework. Both models are able to capture the behavior of these cells under dynamic stimulus conditions to a high degree of temporal precision, although we observe significant differences in the stochastic behavior of the two models.

KW - Integrate-and-fire

KW - Noise

KW - Stimulus-response encoding

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=18144381247&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=18144381247&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.neucom.2004.10.032

DO - 10.1016/j.neucom.2004.10.032

M3 - Article

VL - 65-66

SP - 379

EP - 385

JO - Neurocomputing

JF - Neurocomputing

SN - 0925-2312

IS - SPEC. ISS.

ER -