Comparing apples and oranges: Using reward-specific and reward-general subjective value representation in the brain

Dino J. Levy, Paul Glimcher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The ability of human subjects to choose between disparate kinds of rewards suggests that the neural circuits for valuing different reward types must converge. Economic theory suggests that these convergence points represent the subjective values (SVs) of different reward types on a common scale for comparison. To examine these hypotheses and to map the neural circuits for reward valuation we had food and water-deprived subjects make risky choices for money, food, and water both in and out of a brain scanner. We found that risk preferences across reward types were highly correlated; the level of risk aversion an individual showed when choosing among monetary lotteries predicted their risk aversion toward food and water. We also found that partially distinct neural networks represent the SVs of monetary and food rewards and that these distinct networks showed specific convergence points. The hypothalamic region mainly represented the SV for food, and the posterior cingulate cortex mainly represented the SV for money. In both the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) and striatum there was a common area representing the SV of both reward types, but only the vmPFC significantly represented the SVs of money and food on a common scale appropriate for choice in our data set. A correlation analysis demonstrated interactions across money and food valuation areas and the common areas in the vmPFC and striatum. This may suggest that partially distinct valuation networks for different reward types converge on a unified valuation network, which enables a direct comparison between different reward types and hence guides valuation and choice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)14693-14707
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Neuroscience
Volume31
Issue number41
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 12 2011

Fingerprint

Malus
Reward
Brain
Food
Prefrontal Cortex
Water
Aptitude
Gyrus Cinguli
Economics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Comparing apples and oranges : Using reward-specific and reward-general subjective value representation in the brain. / Levy, Dino J.; Glimcher, Paul.

In: Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 31, No. 41, 12.10.2011, p. 14693-14707.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ba8adbcd1d39445485176fc4850893b3,
title = "Comparing apples and oranges: Using reward-specific and reward-general subjective value representation in the brain",
abstract = "The ability of human subjects to choose between disparate kinds of rewards suggests that the neural circuits for valuing different reward types must converge. Economic theory suggests that these convergence points represent the subjective values (SVs) of different reward types on a common scale for comparison. To examine these hypotheses and to map the neural circuits for reward valuation we had food and water-deprived subjects make risky choices for money, food, and water both in and out of a brain scanner. We found that risk preferences across reward types were highly correlated; the level of risk aversion an individual showed when choosing among monetary lotteries predicted their risk aversion toward food and water. We also found that partially distinct neural networks represent the SVs of monetary and food rewards and that these distinct networks showed specific convergence points. The hypothalamic region mainly represented the SV for food, and the posterior cingulate cortex mainly represented the SV for money. In both the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) and striatum there was a common area representing the SV of both reward types, but only the vmPFC significantly represented the SVs of money and food on a common scale appropriate for choice in our data set. A correlation analysis demonstrated interactions across money and food valuation areas and the common areas in the vmPFC and striatum. This may suggest that partially distinct valuation networks for different reward types converge on a unified valuation network, which enables a direct comparison between different reward types and hence guides valuation and choice.",
author = "Levy, {Dino J.} and Paul Glimcher",
year = "2011",
month = "10",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2218-11.2011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "14693--14707",
journal = "Journal of Neuroscience",
issn = "0270-6474",
publisher = "Society for Neuroscience",
number = "41",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing apples and oranges

T2 - Using reward-specific and reward-general subjective value representation in the brain

AU - Levy, Dino J.

AU - Glimcher, Paul

PY - 2011/10/12

Y1 - 2011/10/12

N2 - The ability of human subjects to choose between disparate kinds of rewards suggests that the neural circuits for valuing different reward types must converge. Economic theory suggests that these convergence points represent the subjective values (SVs) of different reward types on a common scale for comparison. To examine these hypotheses and to map the neural circuits for reward valuation we had food and water-deprived subjects make risky choices for money, food, and water both in and out of a brain scanner. We found that risk preferences across reward types were highly correlated; the level of risk aversion an individual showed when choosing among monetary lotteries predicted their risk aversion toward food and water. We also found that partially distinct neural networks represent the SVs of monetary and food rewards and that these distinct networks showed specific convergence points. The hypothalamic region mainly represented the SV for food, and the posterior cingulate cortex mainly represented the SV for money. In both the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) and striatum there was a common area representing the SV of both reward types, but only the vmPFC significantly represented the SVs of money and food on a common scale appropriate for choice in our data set. A correlation analysis demonstrated interactions across money and food valuation areas and the common areas in the vmPFC and striatum. This may suggest that partially distinct valuation networks for different reward types converge on a unified valuation network, which enables a direct comparison between different reward types and hence guides valuation and choice.

AB - The ability of human subjects to choose between disparate kinds of rewards suggests that the neural circuits for valuing different reward types must converge. Economic theory suggests that these convergence points represent the subjective values (SVs) of different reward types on a common scale for comparison. To examine these hypotheses and to map the neural circuits for reward valuation we had food and water-deprived subjects make risky choices for money, food, and water both in and out of a brain scanner. We found that risk preferences across reward types were highly correlated; the level of risk aversion an individual showed when choosing among monetary lotteries predicted their risk aversion toward food and water. We also found that partially distinct neural networks represent the SVs of monetary and food rewards and that these distinct networks showed specific convergence points. The hypothalamic region mainly represented the SV for food, and the posterior cingulate cortex mainly represented the SV for money. In both the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) and striatum there was a common area representing the SV of both reward types, but only the vmPFC significantly represented the SVs of money and food on a common scale appropriate for choice in our data set. A correlation analysis demonstrated interactions across money and food valuation areas and the common areas in the vmPFC and striatum. This may suggest that partially distinct valuation networks for different reward types converge on a unified valuation network, which enables a direct comparison between different reward types and hence guides valuation and choice.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80054039833&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80054039833&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2218-11.2011

DO - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2218-11.2011

M3 - Article

C2 - 21994386

AN - SCOPUS:80054039833

VL - 31

SP - 14693

EP - 14707

JO - Journal of Neuroscience

JF - Journal of Neuroscience

SN - 0270-6474

IS - 41

ER -