Comparing adolescent reactions to national tobacco countermarketing advertisements using Web TV

Jeff Niederdeppe, James C. Hersey, Matthew C. Farrelly, M. Lyndon Haviland, Cheryl Healton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study examined youth reactions to four tobacco countermarketing messages from the national truth® and "Think. Don't Smoke" tobacco countermarketing campaigns through Web TV using a forced exposure approach. More than 900 respondents completed a baseline survey that established their smoking intentions and behaviors; viewed a series of randomly ordered tobacco countermarketing advertisements; and, after each ad, answered six items gauging individual ad reactions. Respondents across smoking risk groups had more favorable reactions to two ads produced for Legacy's truth® campaign ("Body Bags" and "Daily Dose") compared with all other messages tested. Philip Morris' "My Reasons" received favorable evaluations among teens at lowest risk for future smoking, but consistent with our predictions derived from the theory of psychological reactance (Brehm, 1966), older teens at elevated risk of future smoking responded much less favorably. Teens without prior exposure to another truth® ad using the counter-industry message ("Shredder") rated this ad less favorably. Results underscore the importance of both prior exposure and message features and suggest the presence of other factors associated with ad effectiveness, including message clarity and stylistic presentation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-18
Number of pages16
JournalSocial Marketing Quarterly
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2005

Fingerprint

Tobacco
Smoking
World Wide Web
Teens
Factors
Evaluation
Prediction
Psychological
Industry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Marketing
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Comparing adolescent reactions to national tobacco countermarketing advertisements using Web TV. / Niederdeppe, Jeff; Hersey, James C.; Farrelly, Matthew C.; Haviland, M. Lyndon; Healton, Cheryl.

In: Social Marketing Quarterly, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2005, p. 3-18.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Niederdeppe, Jeff ; Hersey, James C. ; Farrelly, Matthew C. ; Haviland, M. Lyndon ; Healton, Cheryl. / Comparing adolescent reactions to national tobacco countermarketing advertisements using Web TV. In: Social Marketing Quarterly. 2005 ; Vol. 11, No. 1. pp. 3-18.
@article{07efa198176b4f02ad89bb060bc46515,
title = "Comparing adolescent reactions to national tobacco countermarketing advertisements using Web TV",
abstract = "This study examined youth reactions to four tobacco countermarketing messages from the national truth{\circledR} and {"}Think. Don't Smoke{"} tobacco countermarketing campaigns through Web TV using a forced exposure approach. More than 900 respondents completed a baseline survey that established their smoking intentions and behaviors; viewed a series of randomly ordered tobacco countermarketing advertisements; and, after each ad, answered six items gauging individual ad reactions. Respondents across smoking risk groups had more favorable reactions to two ads produced for Legacy's truth{\circledR} campaign ({"}Body Bags{"} and {"}Daily Dose{"}) compared with all other messages tested. Philip Morris' {"}My Reasons{"} received favorable evaluations among teens at lowest risk for future smoking, but consistent with our predictions derived from the theory of psychological reactance (Brehm, 1966), older teens at elevated risk of future smoking responded much less favorably. Teens without prior exposure to another truth{\circledR} ad using the counter-industry message ({"}Shredder{"}) rated this ad less favorably. Results underscore the importance of both prior exposure and message features and suggest the presence of other factors associated with ad effectiveness, including message clarity and stylistic presentation.",
author = "Jeff Niederdeppe and Hersey, {James C.} and Farrelly, {Matthew C.} and Haviland, {M. Lyndon} and Cheryl Healton",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1080/15245000590929982",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "3--18",
journal = "Social Marketing Quarterly",
issn = "1524-5004",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing adolescent reactions to national tobacco countermarketing advertisements using Web TV

AU - Niederdeppe, Jeff

AU - Hersey, James C.

AU - Farrelly, Matthew C.

AU - Haviland, M. Lyndon

AU - Healton, Cheryl

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - This study examined youth reactions to four tobacco countermarketing messages from the national truth® and "Think. Don't Smoke" tobacco countermarketing campaigns through Web TV using a forced exposure approach. More than 900 respondents completed a baseline survey that established their smoking intentions and behaviors; viewed a series of randomly ordered tobacco countermarketing advertisements; and, after each ad, answered six items gauging individual ad reactions. Respondents across smoking risk groups had more favorable reactions to two ads produced for Legacy's truth® campaign ("Body Bags" and "Daily Dose") compared with all other messages tested. Philip Morris' "My Reasons" received favorable evaluations among teens at lowest risk for future smoking, but consistent with our predictions derived from the theory of psychological reactance (Brehm, 1966), older teens at elevated risk of future smoking responded much less favorably. Teens without prior exposure to another truth® ad using the counter-industry message ("Shredder") rated this ad less favorably. Results underscore the importance of both prior exposure and message features and suggest the presence of other factors associated with ad effectiveness, including message clarity and stylistic presentation.

AB - This study examined youth reactions to four tobacco countermarketing messages from the national truth® and "Think. Don't Smoke" tobacco countermarketing campaigns through Web TV using a forced exposure approach. More than 900 respondents completed a baseline survey that established their smoking intentions and behaviors; viewed a series of randomly ordered tobacco countermarketing advertisements; and, after each ad, answered six items gauging individual ad reactions. Respondents across smoking risk groups had more favorable reactions to two ads produced for Legacy's truth® campaign ("Body Bags" and "Daily Dose") compared with all other messages tested. Philip Morris' "My Reasons" received favorable evaluations among teens at lowest risk for future smoking, but consistent with our predictions derived from the theory of psychological reactance (Brehm, 1966), older teens at elevated risk of future smoking responded much less favorably. Teens without prior exposure to another truth® ad using the counter-industry message ("Shredder") rated this ad less favorably. Results underscore the importance of both prior exposure and message features and suggest the presence of other factors associated with ad effectiveness, including message clarity and stylistic presentation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954601117&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954601117&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15245000590929982

DO - 10.1080/15245000590929982

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 3

EP - 18

JO - Social Marketing Quarterly

JF - Social Marketing Quarterly

SN - 1524-5004

IS - 1

ER -