Comparing a template approach and complex bandpass filtering for single-trial analysis of auditory evoked M100

Alfred Link, Martin Burghoff, Anna Salajegheh, David Poeppel, Lutz Trahms, Clemens Elster

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Two methods for single-trial analysis were compared, an established parametric template approach and a recently proposed non-parametric method based on complex bandpass filtering. The comparison was carried out by means of pseudo-real simulations based on magnetoencephalography measurements of cortical responses to auditory signals. The comparison focused on amplitude and latency estimation of the M100 response. The results show that both methods are well suited for single-trial analysis of the auditory evoked M100. While both methods performed similarly with respect to latency estimation, the non-parametric approach was observed to be more robust for amplitude estimation. The non-parametric approach can thus be recommended as an additional valuable tool for single-trial analysis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)106-110
Number of pages5
JournalBiomedizinische Technik
Volume52
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2007

Fingerprint

Magnetoencephalography

Keywords

  • Bandpass filtering
  • Evoked signals
  • Hilbert transform
  • Maximum likelihood
  • Single-trial analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Comparing a template approach and complex bandpass filtering for single-trial analysis of auditory evoked M100. / Link, Alfred; Burghoff, Martin; Salajegheh, Anna; Poeppel, David; Trahms, Lutz; Elster, Clemens.

In: Biomedizinische Technik, Vol. 52, No. 1, 01.02.2007, p. 106-110.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Link, Alfred ; Burghoff, Martin ; Salajegheh, Anna ; Poeppel, David ; Trahms, Lutz ; Elster, Clemens. / Comparing a template approach and complex bandpass filtering for single-trial analysis of auditory evoked M100. In: Biomedizinische Technik. 2007 ; Vol. 52, No. 1. pp. 106-110.
@article{35bd313d215249ffa6916ce730a51372,
title = "Comparing a template approach and complex bandpass filtering for single-trial analysis of auditory evoked M100",
abstract = "Two methods for single-trial analysis were compared, an established parametric template approach and a recently proposed non-parametric method based on complex bandpass filtering. The comparison was carried out by means of pseudo-real simulations based on magnetoencephalography measurements of cortical responses to auditory signals. The comparison focused on amplitude and latency estimation of the M100 response. The results show that both methods are well suited for single-trial analysis of the auditory evoked M100. While both methods performed similarly with respect to latency estimation, the non-parametric approach was observed to be more robust for amplitude estimation. The non-parametric approach can thus be recommended as an additional valuable tool for single-trial analysis.",
keywords = "Bandpass filtering, Evoked signals, Hilbert transform, Maximum likelihood, Single-trial analysis",
author = "Alfred Link and Martin Burghoff and Anna Salajegheh and David Poeppel and Lutz Trahms and Clemens Elster",
year = "2007",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1515/BMT.2007.020",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
pages = "106--110",
journal = "Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering",
issn = "0013-5585",
publisher = "Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing a template approach and complex bandpass filtering for single-trial analysis of auditory evoked M100

AU - Link, Alfred

AU - Burghoff, Martin

AU - Salajegheh, Anna

AU - Poeppel, David

AU - Trahms, Lutz

AU - Elster, Clemens

PY - 2007/2/1

Y1 - 2007/2/1

N2 - Two methods for single-trial analysis were compared, an established parametric template approach and a recently proposed non-parametric method based on complex bandpass filtering. The comparison was carried out by means of pseudo-real simulations based on magnetoencephalography measurements of cortical responses to auditory signals. The comparison focused on amplitude and latency estimation of the M100 response. The results show that both methods are well suited for single-trial analysis of the auditory evoked M100. While both methods performed similarly with respect to latency estimation, the non-parametric approach was observed to be more robust for amplitude estimation. The non-parametric approach can thus be recommended as an additional valuable tool for single-trial analysis.

AB - Two methods for single-trial analysis were compared, an established parametric template approach and a recently proposed non-parametric method based on complex bandpass filtering. The comparison was carried out by means of pseudo-real simulations based on magnetoencephalography measurements of cortical responses to auditory signals. The comparison focused on amplitude and latency estimation of the M100 response. The results show that both methods are well suited for single-trial analysis of the auditory evoked M100. While both methods performed similarly with respect to latency estimation, the non-parametric approach was observed to be more robust for amplitude estimation. The non-parametric approach can thus be recommended as an additional valuable tool for single-trial analysis.

KW - Bandpass filtering

KW - Evoked signals

KW - Hilbert transform

KW - Maximum likelihood

KW - Single-trial analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34247217914&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34247217914&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/BMT.2007.020

DO - 10.1515/BMT.2007.020

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 106

EP - 110

JO - Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering

JF - Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering

SN - 0013-5585

IS - 1

ER -