Comparative efficacy of rapid-release nicotine gum versus nicotine polacrilex gum in relieving smoking cue-provoked craving

Raymond Niaura, Michael Sayette, Saul Shiffman, Elbert D. Glover, Mitch Nides, Morris Shelanski, William Shadel, Randy Koslo, Bruce Robbins, Jim Sorrentino

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Aims: Most relapse episodes occur when smokers are confronted with craving provoked by situational cues. Current nicotine gum can help relieve cue-provoked cravings, but faster effects may result in more rapid relief. We tested a prototype formulation of a new rapid-release nicotine gum (RRNG) that provides more rapid release and absorption of nicotine, for its ability to provide faster and better craving relief compared to current nicotine polacrilex gum (NPG). Design: Random assignment to RRNG or NPG, used during a smoking cue provocation procedure. Participants and setting: A total of 319 smokers were exposed to a smoking cue in the laboratory by being asked to light but not smoke a cigarette of their preferred brand. Subjects then chewed a piece of 2 mg RRNG (n = 159) or 2 mg NPG (n = 160) according to randomized assignment. Measurements: Craving assessments were completed at regular intervals before and after cue exposure (baseline, pre-cue, and 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 25, 30 and 35 minutes after the cue). Findings: Smokers chewing RRNG showed significantly lower craving than NPG subjects starting with the first assessment at 3 minutes (P < 0.025). Repeated-measures ANOVA revealed a significant treatment × time interaction (P < 0.05)-craving scores dropped more rapidly in RRNG subjects compared to NPG subjects. Survival analyses also indicated superiority of RRNG in achieving more rapid self-reported meaningful relief (P < 0.05) and complete relief (P < 0.05) of craving. Conclusions: Rapid-release nicotine gum reduced cue-provoked craving more rapidly compared to NPG, and thus merits further study in cessation efficacy trials.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1720-1730
Number of pages11
JournalAddiction
Volume100
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2005

Fingerprint

Tobacco Use Cessation Products
Gingiva
Nicotine
Cues
Smoking
Craving
Aptitude
Mastication
Survival Analysis
Smoke
Tobacco Products
Analysis of Variance
Light
Recurrence

Keywords

  • Craving
  • Nicotine gum
  • Smoking cues

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Comparative efficacy of rapid-release nicotine gum versus nicotine polacrilex gum in relieving smoking cue-provoked craving. / Niaura, Raymond; Sayette, Michael; Shiffman, Saul; Glover, Elbert D.; Nides, Mitch; Shelanski, Morris; Shadel, William; Koslo, Randy; Robbins, Bruce; Sorrentino, Jim.

In: Addiction, Vol. 100, No. 11, 11.2005, p. 1720-1730.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Niaura, R, Sayette, M, Shiffman, S, Glover, ED, Nides, M, Shelanski, M, Shadel, W, Koslo, R, Robbins, B & Sorrentino, J 2005, 'Comparative efficacy of rapid-release nicotine gum versus nicotine polacrilex gum in relieving smoking cue-provoked craving', Addiction, vol. 100, no. 11, pp. 1720-1730. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01218.x
Niaura, Raymond ; Sayette, Michael ; Shiffman, Saul ; Glover, Elbert D. ; Nides, Mitch ; Shelanski, Morris ; Shadel, William ; Koslo, Randy ; Robbins, Bruce ; Sorrentino, Jim. / Comparative efficacy of rapid-release nicotine gum versus nicotine polacrilex gum in relieving smoking cue-provoked craving. In: Addiction. 2005 ; Vol. 100, No. 11. pp. 1720-1730.
@article{bb0c940708e642c293045219a941585f,
title = "Comparative efficacy of rapid-release nicotine gum versus nicotine polacrilex gum in relieving smoking cue-provoked craving",
abstract = "Aims: Most relapse episodes occur when smokers are confronted with craving provoked by situational cues. Current nicotine gum can help relieve cue-provoked cravings, but faster effects may result in more rapid relief. We tested a prototype formulation of a new rapid-release nicotine gum (RRNG) that provides more rapid release and absorption of nicotine, for its ability to provide faster and better craving relief compared to current nicotine polacrilex gum (NPG). Design: Random assignment to RRNG or NPG, used during a smoking cue provocation procedure. Participants and setting: A total of 319 smokers were exposed to a smoking cue in the laboratory by being asked to light but not smoke a cigarette of their preferred brand. Subjects then chewed a piece of 2 mg RRNG (n = 159) or 2 mg NPG (n = 160) according to randomized assignment. Measurements: Craving assessments were completed at regular intervals before and after cue exposure (baseline, pre-cue, and 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 25, 30 and 35 minutes after the cue). Findings: Smokers chewing RRNG showed significantly lower craving than NPG subjects starting with the first assessment at 3 minutes (P < 0.025). Repeated-measures ANOVA revealed a significant treatment × time interaction (P < 0.05)-craving scores dropped more rapidly in RRNG subjects compared to NPG subjects. Survival analyses also indicated superiority of RRNG in achieving more rapid self-reported meaningful relief (P < 0.05) and complete relief (P < 0.05) of craving. Conclusions: Rapid-release nicotine gum reduced cue-provoked craving more rapidly compared to NPG, and thus merits further study in cessation efficacy trials.",
keywords = "Craving, Nicotine gum, Smoking cues",
author = "Raymond Niaura and Michael Sayette and Saul Shiffman and Glover, {Elbert D.} and Mitch Nides and Morris Shelanski and William Shadel and Randy Koslo and Bruce Robbins and Jim Sorrentino",
year = "2005",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01218.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "100",
pages = "1720--1730",
journal = "Addiction",
issn = "0965-2140",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative efficacy of rapid-release nicotine gum versus nicotine polacrilex gum in relieving smoking cue-provoked craving

AU - Niaura, Raymond

AU - Sayette, Michael

AU - Shiffman, Saul

AU - Glover, Elbert D.

AU - Nides, Mitch

AU - Shelanski, Morris

AU - Shadel, William

AU - Koslo, Randy

AU - Robbins, Bruce

AU - Sorrentino, Jim

PY - 2005/11

Y1 - 2005/11

N2 - Aims: Most relapse episodes occur when smokers are confronted with craving provoked by situational cues. Current nicotine gum can help relieve cue-provoked cravings, but faster effects may result in more rapid relief. We tested a prototype formulation of a new rapid-release nicotine gum (RRNG) that provides more rapid release and absorption of nicotine, for its ability to provide faster and better craving relief compared to current nicotine polacrilex gum (NPG). Design: Random assignment to RRNG or NPG, used during a smoking cue provocation procedure. Participants and setting: A total of 319 smokers were exposed to a smoking cue in the laboratory by being asked to light but not smoke a cigarette of their preferred brand. Subjects then chewed a piece of 2 mg RRNG (n = 159) or 2 mg NPG (n = 160) according to randomized assignment. Measurements: Craving assessments were completed at regular intervals before and after cue exposure (baseline, pre-cue, and 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 25, 30 and 35 minutes after the cue). Findings: Smokers chewing RRNG showed significantly lower craving than NPG subjects starting with the first assessment at 3 minutes (P < 0.025). Repeated-measures ANOVA revealed a significant treatment × time interaction (P < 0.05)-craving scores dropped more rapidly in RRNG subjects compared to NPG subjects. Survival analyses also indicated superiority of RRNG in achieving more rapid self-reported meaningful relief (P < 0.05) and complete relief (P < 0.05) of craving. Conclusions: Rapid-release nicotine gum reduced cue-provoked craving more rapidly compared to NPG, and thus merits further study in cessation efficacy trials.

AB - Aims: Most relapse episodes occur when smokers are confronted with craving provoked by situational cues. Current nicotine gum can help relieve cue-provoked cravings, but faster effects may result in more rapid relief. We tested a prototype formulation of a new rapid-release nicotine gum (RRNG) that provides more rapid release and absorption of nicotine, for its ability to provide faster and better craving relief compared to current nicotine polacrilex gum (NPG). Design: Random assignment to RRNG or NPG, used during a smoking cue provocation procedure. Participants and setting: A total of 319 smokers were exposed to a smoking cue in the laboratory by being asked to light but not smoke a cigarette of their preferred brand. Subjects then chewed a piece of 2 mg RRNG (n = 159) or 2 mg NPG (n = 160) according to randomized assignment. Measurements: Craving assessments were completed at regular intervals before and after cue exposure (baseline, pre-cue, and 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 25, 30 and 35 minutes after the cue). Findings: Smokers chewing RRNG showed significantly lower craving than NPG subjects starting with the first assessment at 3 minutes (P < 0.025). Repeated-measures ANOVA revealed a significant treatment × time interaction (P < 0.05)-craving scores dropped more rapidly in RRNG subjects compared to NPG subjects. Survival analyses also indicated superiority of RRNG in achieving more rapid self-reported meaningful relief (P < 0.05) and complete relief (P < 0.05) of craving. Conclusions: Rapid-release nicotine gum reduced cue-provoked craving more rapidly compared to NPG, and thus merits further study in cessation efficacy trials.

KW - Craving

KW - Nicotine gum

KW - Smoking cues

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27744557237&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27744557237&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01218.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01218.x

M3 - Article

VL - 100

SP - 1720

EP - 1730

JO - Addiction

JF - Addiction

SN - 0965-2140

IS - 11

ER -