Committing to implementation intentions

Attention and memory effects for selected situational cues

Anja Achtziger, Ute C. Bayer, Peter Gollwitzer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Two studies tested whether forming implementation intentions (Gollwitzer, Am Psychol 54:493-503 in 1999) results in a heightened activation of specified situational cues. Going beyond prior studies, participants of the present studies specified these opportunities on their own (i. e., the action cues were not assigned by the experimenter), and activation level was assessed by attraction of attention and recall performance rather than lexical decisions. In Study 1, situational cues associated with the where and when to act on an everyday life goal attracted more attention than non-specified cues when presented to the non-attended channel in a dichotic listening task. In Study 2, the recall of specified cues was better than that of non-specified cues both 15 min after forming implementation intentions and after a delay of 2 days. Importantly, goal commitment and implementation intention commitment moderated this effect.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)287-300
Number of pages14
JournalMotivation and Emotion
Volume36
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Cues

Keywords

  • Cognitive accessibility
  • Commitment
  • Goals
  • Implementation intentions
  • Intentions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Committing to implementation intentions : Attention and memory effects for selected situational cues. / Achtziger, Anja; Bayer, Ute C.; Gollwitzer, Peter.

In: Motivation and Emotion, Vol. 36, No. 3, 2012, p. 287-300.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3dcff52d3f1b468fb3f3edd0a64e6483,
title = "Committing to implementation intentions: Attention and memory effects for selected situational cues",
abstract = "Two studies tested whether forming implementation intentions (Gollwitzer, Am Psychol 54:493-503 in 1999) results in a heightened activation of specified situational cues. Going beyond prior studies, participants of the present studies specified these opportunities on their own (i. e., the action cues were not assigned by the experimenter), and activation level was assessed by attraction of attention and recall performance rather than lexical decisions. In Study 1, situational cues associated with the where and when to act on an everyday life goal attracted more attention than non-specified cues when presented to the non-attended channel in a dichotic listening task. In Study 2, the recall of specified cues was better than that of non-specified cues both 15 min after forming implementation intentions and after a delay of 2 days. Importantly, goal commitment and implementation intention commitment moderated this effect.",
keywords = "Cognitive accessibility, Commitment, Goals, Implementation intentions, Intentions",
author = "Anja Achtziger and Bayer, {Ute C.} and Peter Gollwitzer",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1007/s11031-011-9261-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "287--300",
journal = "Motivation and Emotion",
issn = "0146-7239",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Committing to implementation intentions

T2 - Attention and memory effects for selected situational cues

AU - Achtziger, Anja

AU - Bayer, Ute C.

AU - Gollwitzer, Peter

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Two studies tested whether forming implementation intentions (Gollwitzer, Am Psychol 54:493-503 in 1999) results in a heightened activation of specified situational cues. Going beyond prior studies, participants of the present studies specified these opportunities on their own (i. e., the action cues were not assigned by the experimenter), and activation level was assessed by attraction of attention and recall performance rather than lexical decisions. In Study 1, situational cues associated with the where and when to act on an everyday life goal attracted more attention than non-specified cues when presented to the non-attended channel in a dichotic listening task. In Study 2, the recall of specified cues was better than that of non-specified cues both 15 min after forming implementation intentions and after a delay of 2 days. Importantly, goal commitment and implementation intention commitment moderated this effect.

AB - Two studies tested whether forming implementation intentions (Gollwitzer, Am Psychol 54:493-503 in 1999) results in a heightened activation of specified situational cues. Going beyond prior studies, participants of the present studies specified these opportunities on their own (i. e., the action cues were not assigned by the experimenter), and activation level was assessed by attraction of attention and recall performance rather than lexical decisions. In Study 1, situational cues associated with the where and when to act on an everyday life goal attracted more attention than non-specified cues when presented to the non-attended channel in a dichotic listening task. In Study 2, the recall of specified cues was better than that of non-specified cues both 15 min after forming implementation intentions and after a delay of 2 days. Importantly, goal commitment and implementation intention commitment moderated this effect.

KW - Cognitive accessibility

KW - Commitment

KW - Goals

KW - Implementation intentions

KW - Intentions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864748306&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864748306&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11031-011-9261-6

DO - 10.1007/s11031-011-9261-6

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 287

EP - 300

JO - Motivation and Emotion

JF - Motivation and Emotion

SN - 0146-7239

IS - 3

ER -