Combining priors and noisy visual cues in a rapid pointing task

Hadley Tassinari, Todd E. Hudson, Michael S. Landy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Statistical decision theory suggests that choosing an ideal action requires taking several factors into account: (1) prior knowledge of the probability of various world states, (2) sensory information concerning the world state, (3) the probability of outcomes given a choice of action, and (4) the loss or gain associated with those outcomes. In previous work, we found that, in many circumstances, humans act like ideal decision makers in planning a reaching movement. They select a movement aim point that maximizes expected gain, thus taking into account outcome uncertainty (motor noise) and the consequences of their actions. Here, we ask whether humans can optimally combine prior knowledge and uncertain sensory information in planning a reach. Subjects rapidly pointed at unseen targets, indicated with dots drawn from a distribution centered on the invisible target location. Target location had a prior distribution, the form of which was known to the subject. We varied the number of dots and hence target spatial uncertainty. An analysis of the sources of uncertainty impacting performance in this task indicated that the optimal strategy was to aim between the mean of the prior (the screen center) and the mean stimulus location (centroid of the dot cloud). With increased target location uncertainty, the aim point should have moved closer to the prior. Subjects used near-optimal strategies, combining stimulus uncertainty and prior information appropriately. Observer behavior was well modeled as having three additional sources of inefficiency originating in the motor system, calculation of centroid location, and calculation of aim points.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)10154-10163
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Neuroscience
Volume26
Issue number40
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 4 2006

Fingerprint

Uncertainty
Cues
Decision Theory
Task Performance and Analysis
Noise

Keywords

  • Decision making
  • Motor control
  • Movement planning
  • Optimality
  • Reaching
  • Statistical decision theory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Combining priors and noisy visual cues in a rapid pointing task. / Tassinari, Hadley; Hudson, Todd E.; Landy, Michael S.

In: Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 26, No. 40, 04.10.2006, p. 10154-10163.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tassinari, Hadley ; Hudson, Todd E. ; Landy, Michael S. / Combining priors and noisy visual cues in a rapid pointing task. In: Journal of Neuroscience. 2006 ; Vol. 26, No. 40. pp. 10154-10163.
@article{3ef82f09d9f54ad592f0d9b79fcb8eee,
title = "Combining priors and noisy visual cues in a rapid pointing task",
abstract = "Statistical decision theory suggests that choosing an ideal action requires taking several factors into account: (1) prior knowledge of the probability of various world states, (2) sensory information concerning the world state, (3) the probability of outcomes given a choice of action, and (4) the loss or gain associated with those outcomes. In previous work, we found that, in many circumstances, humans act like ideal decision makers in planning a reaching movement. They select a movement aim point that maximizes expected gain, thus taking into account outcome uncertainty (motor noise) and the consequences of their actions. Here, we ask whether humans can optimally combine prior knowledge and uncertain sensory information in planning a reach. Subjects rapidly pointed at unseen targets, indicated with dots drawn from a distribution centered on the invisible target location. Target location had a prior distribution, the form of which was known to the subject. We varied the number of dots and hence target spatial uncertainty. An analysis of the sources of uncertainty impacting performance in this task indicated that the optimal strategy was to aim between the mean of the prior (the screen center) and the mean stimulus location (centroid of the dot cloud). With increased target location uncertainty, the aim point should have moved closer to the prior. Subjects used near-optimal strategies, combining stimulus uncertainty and prior information appropriately. Observer behavior was well modeled as having three additional sources of inefficiency originating in the motor system, calculation of centroid location, and calculation of aim points.",
keywords = "Decision making, Motor control, Movement planning, Optimality, Reaching, Statistical decision theory",
author = "Hadley Tassinari and Hudson, {Todd E.} and Landy, {Michael S.}",
year = "2006",
month = "10",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2779-06.2006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "10154--10163",
journal = "Journal of Neuroscience",
issn = "0270-6474",
publisher = "Society for Neuroscience",
number = "40",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Combining priors and noisy visual cues in a rapid pointing task

AU - Tassinari, Hadley

AU - Hudson, Todd E.

AU - Landy, Michael S.

PY - 2006/10/4

Y1 - 2006/10/4

N2 - Statistical decision theory suggests that choosing an ideal action requires taking several factors into account: (1) prior knowledge of the probability of various world states, (2) sensory information concerning the world state, (3) the probability of outcomes given a choice of action, and (4) the loss or gain associated with those outcomes. In previous work, we found that, in many circumstances, humans act like ideal decision makers in planning a reaching movement. They select a movement aim point that maximizes expected gain, thus taking into account outcome uncertainty (motor noise) and the consequences of their actions. Here, we ask whether humans can optimally combine prior knowledge and uncertain sensory information in planning a reach. Subjects rapidly pointed at unseen targets, indicated with dots drawn from a distribution centered on the invisible target location. Target location had a prior distribution, the form of which was known to the subject. We varied the number of dots and hence target spatial uncertainty. An analysis of the sources of uncertainty impacting performance in this task indicated that the optimal strategy was to aim between the mean of the prior (the screen center) and the mean stimulus location (centroid of the dot cloud). With increased target location uncertainty, the aim point should have moved closer to the prior. Subjects used near-optimal strategies, combining stimulus uncertainty and prior information appropriately. Observer behavior was well modeled as having three additional sources of inefficiency originating in the motor system, calculation of centroid location, and calculation of aim points.

AB - Statistical decision theory suggests that choosing an ideal action requires taking several factors into account: (1) prior knowledge of the probability of various world states, (2) sensory information concerning the world state, (3) the probability of outcomes given a choice of action, and (4) the loss or gain associated with those outcomes. In previous work, we found that, in many circumstances, humans act like ideal decision makers in planning a reaching movement. They select a movement aim point that maximizes expected gain, thus taking into account outcome uncertainty (motor noise) and the consequences of their actions. Here, we ask whether humans can optimally combine prior knowledge and uncertain sensory information in planning a reach. Subjects rapidly pointed at unseen targets, indicated with dots drawn from a distribution centered on the invisible target location. Target location had a prior distribution, the form of which was known to the subject. We varied the number of dots and hence target spatial uncertainty. An analysis of the sources of uncertainty impacting performance in this task indicated that the optimal strategy was to aim between the mean of the prior (the screen center) and the mean stimulus location (centroid of the dot cloud). With increased target location uncertainty, the aim point should have moved closer to the prior. Subjects used near-optimal strategies, combining stimulus uncertainty and prior information appropriately. Observer behavior was well modeled as having three additional sources of inefficiency originating in the motor system, calculation of centroid location, and calculation of aim points.

KW - Decision making

KW - Motor control

KW - Movement planning

KW - Optimality

KW - Reaching

KW - Statistical decision theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33749528973&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33749528973&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2779-06.2006

DO - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2779-06.2006

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 10154

EP - 10163

JO - Journal of Neuroscience

JF - Journal of Neuroscience

SN - 0270-6474

IS - 40

ER -