Combining Full and Partial Haptic Guidance Improves Handwriting Skills Development

Mohamad Eid, Akiko Teranishi, Georgios Korres, Mohamad Eid

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    It has been shown in previous studies that haptic guidance improves the learning outcomes of handwriting motor skills. Full and partial haptic guidance are developed and evaluated in the literature. In this paper, we present two experimental studies to examine whether combining full and partial haptic guidance is more effective for improving handwriting skills than merely full or partial guidance methods. Experiment I, with 22 participants, compares the effectiveness of merely full and partial haptic guidance methods towards improving learning outcomes of Arabic handwriting. Even though haptic guidance in general is found to be effective and pleasant by all participants, experiment I concludes that there are no statistically significant differences in the learning outcomes between full and partial haptic guidance. Experiment II investigates whether a combination of full and partial haptic guidance could further improve the learning outcomes, compared to merely full or partial haptic guidance. The learning outcomes and quality of experience are measured to evaluate each group's performance. Results from experiment II demonstrate that the combination of full and partial haptic guidance results in statistically significant improvements in the quality of handwriting, compared to mere full or partial haptic guidance. In particular, starting with partial haptic guidance at early stage of learning and then using full guidance at intermediate/advanced learning stages seemed to be the most effective. This implies that partial haptic guidance is more effective to learn the gross shape of handwriting skills (at early stages of the learning process) whereas full haptic guidance is more effective to learn the fine details of the handwriting skills (at intermediate or advanced stage of learning). Therefore, partial-then-full haptic guidance seems to be the most effective to improve learning outcomes.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    JournalIEEE Transactions on Haptics
    DOIs
    StateAccepted/In press - Jun 28 2018

    Fingerprint

    Experiments

    Keywords

    • Evaluation/Methodology
    • Haptic interfaces
    • Haptic Interfaces
    • Psychology
    • Task analysis
    • Tools
    • Training
    • Trajectory
    • User-centered Design
    • Writing

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Human-Computer Interaction
    • Computer Science Applications

    Cite this

    Combining Full and Partial Haptic Guidance Improves Handwriting Skills Development. / Eid, Mohamad; Teranishi, Akiko; Korres, Georgios; Eid, Mohamad.

    In: IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 28.06.2018.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Eid, Mohamad ; Teranishi, Akiko ; Korres, Georgios ; Eid, Mohamad. / Combining Full and Partial Haptic Guidance Improves Handwriting Skills Development. In: IEEE Transactions on Haptics. 2018.
    @article{e68b4b012d9a4045adac423599d9a57e,
    title = "Combining Full and Partial Haptic Guidance Improves Handwriting Skills Development",
    abstract = "It has been shown in previous studies that haptic guidance improves the learning outcomes of handwriting motor skills. Full and partial haptic guidance are developed and evaluated in the literature. In this paper, we present two experimental studies to examine whether combining full and partial haptic guidance is more effective for improving handwriting skills than merely full or partial guidance methods. Experiment I, with 22 participants, compares the effectiveness of merely full and partial haptic guidance methods towards improving learning outcomes of Arabic handwriting. Even though haptic guidance in general is found to be effective and pleasant by all participants, experiment I concludes that there are no statistically significant differences in the learning outcomes between full and partial haptic guidance. Experiment II investigates whether a combination of full and partial haptic guidance could further improve the learning outcomes, compared to merely full or partial haptic guidance. The learning outcomes and quality of experience are measured to evaluate each group's performance. Results from experiment II demonstrate that the combination of full and partial haptic guidance results in statistically significant improvements in the quality of handwriting, compared to mere full or partial haptic guidance. In particular, starting with partial haptic guidance at early stage of learning and then using full guidance at intermediate/advanced learning stages seemed to be the most effective. This implies that partial haptic guidance is more effective to learn the gross shape of handwriting skills (at early stages of the learning process) whereas full haptic guidance is more effective to learn the fine details of the handwriting skills (at intermediate or advanced stage of learning). Therefore, partial-then-full haptic guidance seems to be the most effective to improve learning outcomes.",
    keywords = "Evaluation/Methodology, Haptic interfaces, Haptic Interfaces, Psychology, Task analysis, Tools, Training, Trajectory, User-centered Design, Writing",
    author = "Mohamad Eid and Akiko Teranishi and Georgios Korres and Mohamad Eid",
    year = "2018",
    month = "6",
    day = "28",
    doi = "10.1109/TOH.2018.2851511",
    language = "English (US)",
    journal = "IEEE Transactions on Haptics",
    issn = "1939-1412",
    publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Combining Full and Partial Haptic Guidance Improves Handwriting Skills Development

    AU - Eid, Mohamad

    AU - Teranishi, Akiko

    AU - Korres, Georgios

    AU - Eid, Mohamad

    PY - 2018/6/28

    Y1 - 2018/6/28

    N2 - It has been shown in previous studies that haptic guidance improves the learning outcomes of handwriting motor skills. Full and partial haptic guidance are developed and evaluated in the literature. In this paper, we present two experimental studies to examine whether combining full and partial haptic guidance is more effective for improving handwriting skills than merely full or partial guidance methods. Experiment I, with 22 participants, compares the effectiveness of merely full and partial haptic guidance methods towards improving learning outcomes of Arabic handwriting. Even though haptic guidance in general is found to be effective and pleasant by all participants, experiment I concludes that there are no statistically significant differences in the learning outcomes between full and partial haptic guidance. Experiment II investigates whether a combination of full and partial haptic guidance could further improve the learning outcomes, compared to merely full or partial haptic guidance. The learning outcomes and quality of experience are measured to evaluate each group's performance. Results from experiment II demonstrate that the combination of full and partial haptic guidance results in statistically significant improvements in the quality of handwriting, compared to mere full or partial haptic guidance. In particular, starting with partial haptic guidance at early stage of learning and then using full guidance at intermediate/advanced learning stages seemed to be the most effective. This implies that partial haptic guidance is more effective to learn the gross shape of handwriting skills (at early stages of the learning process) whereas full haptic guidance is more effective to learn the fine details of the handwriting skills (at intermediate or advanced stage of learning). Therefore, partial-then-full haptic guidance seems to be the most effective to improve learning outcomes.

    AB - It has been shown in previous studies that haptic guidance improves the learning outcomes of handwriting motor skills. Full and partial haptic guidance are developed and evaluated in the literature. In this paper, we present two experimental studies to examine whether combining full and partial haptic guidance is more effective for improving handwriting skills than merely full or partial guidance methods. Experiment I, with 22 participants, compares the effectiveness of merely full and partial haptic guidance methods towards improving learning outcomes of Arabic handwriting. Even though haptic guidance in general is found to be effective and pleasant by all participants, experiment I concludes that there are no statistically significant differences in the learning outcomes between full and partial haptic guidance. Experiment II investigates whether a combination of full and partial haptic guidance could further improve the learning outcomes, compared to merely full or partial haptic guidance. The learning outcomes and quality of experience are measured to evaluate each group's performance. Results from experiment II demonstrate that the combination of full and partial haptic guidance results in statistically significant improvements in the quality of handwriting, compared to mere full or partial haptic guidance. In particular, starting with partial haptic guidance at early stage of learning and then using full guidance at intermediate/advanced learning stages seemed to be the most effective. This implies that partial haptic guidance is more effective to learn the gross shape of handwriting skills (at early stages of the learning process) whereas full haptic guidance is more effective to learn the fine details of the handwriting skills (at intermediate or advanced stage of learning). Therefore, partial-then-full haptic guidance seems to be the most effective to improve learning outcomes.

    KW - Evaluation/Methodology

    KW - Haptic interfaces

    KW - Haptic Interfaces

    KW - Psychology

    KW - Task analysis

    KW - Tools

    KW - Training

    KW - Trajectory

    KW - User-centered Design

    KW - Writing

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049349293&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049349293&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1109/TOH.2018.2851511

    DO - 10.1109/TOH.2018.2851511

    M3 - Article

    JO - IEEE Transactions on Haptics

    JF - IEEE Transactions on Haptics

    SN - 1939-1412

    ER -