Combined use of intersubject and intrasubject controls to distinguish treatment versus patient effect in retrospective studies.

M. A. Freilich, Ralph Katz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Clinical researchers seek to eliminate specific subject attributes from becoming confounding variables to distinguish a treatment effect from an underlying patient effect. In prospective studies, the random assignment of subjects into experimental groups results in the equal distribution of subject attributes, thereby eliminating them as confounding variables. Retrospective study designs, often used in prosthodontics research, preclude the random assignment of subjects. This article describes the application of a standard research design that combines the use of intersubject and intrasubject controls to compensate for the potential imbalance in subject attributes in retrospective clinical studies. This approach should help prevent clinical investigators from declaring differences between experimental groups when, in fact, no differences exist.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)482-486
Number of pages5
JournalInternational Journal of Prosthodontics
Volume4
Issue number5
StatePublished - Sep 1991

Fingerprint

Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)
Retrospective Studies
Research Personnel
Prosthodontics
Research Design
Prospective Studies
Therapeutics
Research
Clinical Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

@article{296da78a0b114d88b4bcbf1a7170445a,
title = "Combined use of intersubject and intrasubject controls to distinguish treatment versus patient effect in retrospective studies.",
abstract = "Clinical researchers seek to eliminate specific subject attributes from becoming confounding variables to distinguish a treatment effect from an underlying patient effect. In prospective studies, the random assignment of subjects into experimental groups results in the equal distribution of subject attributes, thereby eliminating them as confounding variables. Retrospective study designs, often used in prosthodontics research, preclude the random assignment of subjects. This article describes the application of a standard research design that combines the use of intersubject and intrasubject controls to compensate for the potential imbalance in subject attributes in retrospective clinical studies. This approach should help prevent clinical investigators from declaring differences between experimental groups when, in fact, no differences exist.",
author = "Freilich, {M. A.} and Ralph Katz",
year = "1991",
month = "9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "482--486",
journal = "International Journal of Prosthodontics",
issn = "0893-2174",
publisher = "Quintessence Publishing Company",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Combined use of intersubject and intrasubject controls to distinguish treatment versus patient effect in retrospective studies.

AU - Freilich, M. A.

AU - Katz, Ralph

PY - 1991/9

Y1 - 1991/9

N2 - Clinical researchers seek to eliminate specific subject attributes from becoming confounding variables to distinguish a treatment effect from an underlying patient effect. In prospective studies, the random assignment of subjects into experimental groups results in the equal distribution of subject attributes, thereby eliminating them as confounding variables. Retrospective study designs, often used in prosthodontics research, preclude the random assignment of subjects. This article describes the application of a standard research design that combines the use of intersubject and intrasubject controls to compensate for the potential imbalance in subject attributes in retrospective clinical studies. This approach should help prevent clinical investigators from declaring differences between experimental groups when, in fact, no differences exist.

AB - Clinical researchers seek to eliminate specific subject attributes from becoming confounding variables to distinguish a treatment effect from an underlying patient effect. In prospective studies, the random assignment of subjects into experimental groups results in the equal distribution of subject attributes, thereby eliminating them as confounding variables. Retrospective study designs, often used in prosthodontics research, preclude the random assignment of subjects. This article describes the application of a standard research design that combines the use of intersubject and intrasubject controls to compensate for the potential imbalance in subject attributes in retrospective clinical studies. This approach should help prevent clinical investigators from declaring differences between experimental groups when, in fact, no differences exist.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026215384&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026215384&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 1811645

AN - SCOPUS:0026215384

VL - 4

SP - 482

EP - 486

JO - International Journal of Prosthodontics

JF - International Journal of Prosthodontics

SN - 0893-2174

IS - 5

ER -