Combined Clinic-Home Approach for Upper Limb Robotic Therapy after Stroke: A Pilot Study

Grace Kim, Lisa Rivera, Joel Stein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective To investigate the feasibility of a combined clinic-home intervention using a robotic elbow brace and, secondarily, to collect preliminary data on the efficacy of this clinic-home intervention. Design Nonrandomized pre-/postinterventional study. Setting Outpatient clinic and participants' homes. Participants Individuals at least 6 months after stroke (N=11; 5 women and 6 men; mean age, 51.7y; mean time since stroke, 7.6y; mean Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity [FMA-UE] score, 22 of 66) were enrolled from the community. Interventions Participants received training in an outpatient clinic from an experienced occupational therapist to gain independence with use of the device (3-9 sessions) followed by a 6-week home program using the device at home. Main Outcome Measures Five instruments were administered before and after the study intervention: Modified Ashworth Scale, Box and Blocks test, FMA-UE, Arm Motor Ability Test, and Motor Activity Log-Amount of Use and Motor Activity Log-How Well subscales (MAL-AOU, MAL-HW). Results Nine participants completed the study. Participants used the device on average 42.9min/d, 5.3d/wk. The FMA-UE (t=3.32; P=.01), MAL-AOU (t=4.40; P=.002), and MAL-HW (t=4.02; P=.004) scores showed statistically significant improvement from baseline to discharge; the MAL-AOU (t=2.61; P=.035) and MAL-HW (t=2.47; P=.043) scores were also significantly improved from baseline to 3-month follow-up. Conclusions This combined clinic-home intervention was feasible and effective. Participants demonstrated improvements in arm impairment and self-reported use of the arm from baseline to discharge; they continued to report significant improvement in actual use of the arm at 3-month follow-up.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2243-2248
Number of pages6
JournalArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume96
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2015

Fingerprint

Robotics
Upper Extremity
Arm
Stroke
Ambulatory Care Facilities
Equipment and Supplies
Motor Activity
Braces
Aptitude
Therapeutics
Elbow
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Keywords

  • Paresis
  • Rehabilitation
  • Robotics
  • Stroke
  • clinic-home approach
  • combined approach
  • upper limb
  • upper limb robotic therapy
  • robotic therapy
  • post-stroke
  • clinic-home intervention

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Combined Clinic-Home Approach for Upper Limb Robotic Therapy after Stroke : A Pilot Study. / Kim, Grace; Rivera, Lisa; Stein, Joel.

In: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 96, No. 12, 01.12.2015, p. 2243-2248.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6cfd6681a07143309a1ac1e7037a39ed,
title = "Combined Clinic-Home Approach for Upper Limb Robotic Therapy after Stroke: A Pilot Study",
abstract = "Objective To investigate the feasibility of a combined clinic-home intervention using a robotic elbow brace and, secondarily, to collect preliminary data on the efficacy of this clinic-home intervention. Design Nonrandomized pre-/postinterventional study. Setting Outpatient clinic and participants' homes. Participants Individuals at least 6 months after stroke (N=11; 5 women and 6 men; mean age, 51.7y; mean time since stroke, 7.6y; mean Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity [FMA-UE] score, 22 of 66) were enrolled from the community. Interventions Participants received training in an outpatient clinic from an experienced occupational therapist to gain independence with use of the device (3-9 sessions) followed by a 6-week home program using the device at home. Main Outcome Measures Five instruments were administered before and after the study intervention: Modified Ashworth Scale, Box and Blocks test, FMA-UE, Arm Motor Ability Test, and Motor Activity Log-Amount of Use and Motor Activity Log-How Well subscales (MAL-AOU, MAL-HW). Results Nine participants completed the study. Participants used the device on average 42.9min/d, 5.3d/wk. The FMA-UE (t=3.32; P=.01), MAL-AOU (t=4.40; P=.002), and MAL-HW (t=4.02; P=.004) scores showed statistically significant improvement from baseline to discharge; the MAL-AOU (t=2.61; P=.035) and MAL-HW (t=2.47; P=.043) scores were also significantly improved from baseline to 3-month follow-up. Conclusions This combined clinic-home intervention was feasible and effective. Participants demonstrated improvements in arm impairment and self-reported use of the arm from baseline to discharge; they continued to report significant improvement in actual use of the arm at 3-month follow-up.",
keywords = "Paresis, Rehabilitation, Robotics, Stroke, clinic-home approach, combined approach, upper limb, upper limb robotic therapy, robotic therapy, post-stroke, clinic-home intervention",
author = "Grace Kim and Lisa Rivera and Joel Stein",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.apmr.2015.06.019",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "96",
pages = "2243--2248",
journal = "Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0003-9993",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Combined Clinic-Home Approach for Upper Limb Robotic Therapy after Stroke

T2 - A Pilot Study

AU - Kim, Grace

AU - Rivera, Lisa

AU - Stein, Joel

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - Objective To investigate the feasibility of a combined clinic-home intervention using a robotic elbow brace and, secondarily, to collect preliminary data on the efficacy of this clinic-home intervention. Design Nonrandomized pre-/postinterventional study. Setting Outpatient clinic and participants' homes. Participants Individuals at least 6 months after stroke (N=11; 5 women and 6 men; mean age, 51.7y; mean time since stroke, 7.6y; mean Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity [FMA-UE] score, 22 of 66) were enrolled from the community. Interventions Participants received training in an outpatient clinic from an experienced occupational therapist to gain independence with use of the device (3-9 sessions) followed by a 6-week home program using the device at home. Main Outcome Measures Five instruments were administered before and after the study intervention: Modified Ashworth Scale, Box and Blocks test, FMA-UE, Arm Motor Ability Test, and Motor Activity Log-Amount of Use and Motor Activity Log-How Well subscales (MAL-AOU, MAL-HW). Results Nine participants completed the study. Participants used the device on average 42.9min/d, 5.3d/wk. The FMA-UE (t=3.32; P=.01), MAL-AOU (t=4.40; P=.002), and MAL-HW (t=4.02; P=.004) scores showed statistically significant improvement from baseline to discharge; the MAL-AOU (t=2.61; P=.035) and MAL-HW (t=2.47; P=.043) scores were also significantly improved from baseline to 3-month follow-up. Conclusions This combined clinic-home intervention was feasible and effective. Participants demonstrated improvements in arm impairment and self-reported use of the arm from baseline to discharge; they continued to report significant improvement in actual use of the arm at 3-month follow-up.

AB - Objective To investigate the feasibility of a combined clinic-home intervention using a robotic elbow brace and, secondarily, to collect preliminary data on the efficacy of this clinic-home intervention. Design Nonrandomized pre-/postinterventional study. Setting Outpatient clinic and participants' homes. Participants Individuals at least 6 months after stroke (N=11; 5 women and 6 men; mean age, 51.7y; mean time since stroke, 7.6y; mean Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity [FMA-UE] score, 22 of 66) were enrolled from the community. Interventions Participants received training in an outpatient clinic from an experienced occupational therapist to gain independence with use of the device (3-9 sessions) followed by a 6-week home program using the device at home. Main Outcome Measures Five instruments were administered before and after the study intervention: Modified Ashworth Scale, Box and Blocks test, FMA-UE, Arm Motor Ability Test, and Motor Activity Log-Amount of Use and Motor Activity Log-How Well subscales (MAL-AOU, MAL-HW). Results Nine participants completed the study. Participants used the device on average 42.9min/d, 5.3d/wk. The FMA-UE (t=3.32; P=.01), MAL-AOU (t=4.40; P=.002), and MAL-HW (t=4.02; P=.004) scores showed statistically significant improvement from baseline to discharge; the MAL-AOU (t=2.61; P=.035) and MAL-HW (t=2.47; P=.043) scores were also significantly improved from baseline to 3-month follow-up. Conclusions This combined clinic-home intervention was feasible and effective. Participants demonstrated improvements in arm impairment and self-reported use of the arm from baseline to discharge; they continued to report significant improvement in actual use of the arm at 3-month follow-up.

KW - Paresis

KW - Rehabilitation

KW - Robotics

KW - Stroke

KW - clinic-home approach

KW - combined approach

KW - upper limb

KW - upper limb robotic therapy

KW - robotic therapy

KW - post-stroke

KW - clinic-home intervention

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947867327&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947867327&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.06.019

DO - 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.06.019

M3 - Article

C2 - 26189202

AN - SCOPUS:84947867327

VL - 96

SP - 2243

EP - 2248

JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

SN - 0003-9993

IS - 12

ER -