Collaborative networks and new ways of knowing

Raul P. Lejano, Helen Ingram

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

To move beyond legal and regulatory gridlock around water issues in the California Bay-Delta, a new inter-agency initiative, commonly known as CALFED, was created in 1994. CALFED has been an ongoing experiment in policy innovation. Part of the change in management practice has involved constructing new arenas that engage multiple perspectives and transform regulatory impasse into provisional steps forward. We examine the construction of so-called boundary objects, which are forums and policy instruments that cross group boundaries and foster integrative deliberation. We compare the design and action of two boundary objects created by CALFED, namely the Environmental Water Account (EWA) and the Water Use Efficiency (WUE) program. We find that the presence of the boundary object, in itself, does little to explain the success of each policy experiment. Rather, the answer lies in the types of network interactions that result, along with the way meaning is coproduced. In fact, rather than create new patterns of interrelationship (e.g., between fish habitat advocates and pump station operators), the boundary object might further embed institutionalized routines. To more deeply understand what makes the new institution an integrative one, we introduce the concept of Ways of Knowing which explains how new knowledge emerges from the network of new relationships.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)653-662
Number of pages10
JournalEnvironmental Science and Policy
Volume12
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2009

Fingerprint

water
innovation policy
experiment
deliberation
habitat
water use efficiency
management practice
pump
transform
innovation
efficiency
interaction
management
knowledge
fish
Group
policy
station
programme
policy instrument

Keywords

  • CALFED
  • Institutions
  • Networks
  • Policy analysis
  • Water

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

Collaborative networks and new ways of knowing. / Lejano, Raul P.; Ingram, Helen.

In: Environmental Science and Policy, Vol. 12, No. 6, 10.2009, p. 653-662.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lejano, Raul P. ; Ingram, Helen. / Collaborative networks and new ways of knowing. In: Environmental Science and Policy. 2009 ; Vol. 12, No. 6. pp. 653-662.
@article{03b5c6540b444c54a3ce1d68465ab6b2,
title = "Collaborative networks and new ways of knowing",
abstract = "To move beyond legal and regulatory gridlock around water issues in the California Bay-Delta, a new inter-agency initiative, commonly known as CALFED, was created in 1994. CALFED has been an ongoing experiment in policy innovation. Part of the change in management practice has involved constructing new arenas that engage multiple perspectives and transform regulatory impasse into provisional steps forward. We examine the construction of so-called boundary objects, which are forums and policy instruments that cross group boundaries and foster integrative deliberation. We compare the design and action of two boundary objects created by CALFED, namely the Environmental Water Account (EWA) and the Water Use Efficiency (WUE) program. We find that the presence of the boundary object, in itself, does little to explain the success of each policy experiment. Rather, the answer lies in the types of network interactions that result, along with the way meaning is coproduced. In fact, rather than create new patterns of interrelationship (e.g., between fish habitat advocates and pump station operators), the boundary object might further embed institutionalized routines. To more deeply understand what makes the new institution an integrative one, we introduce the concept of Ways of Knowing which explains how new knowledge emerges from the network of new relationships.",
keywords = "CALFED, Institutions, Networks, Policy analysis, Water",
author = "Lejano, {Raul P.} and Helen Ingram",
year = "2009",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.envsci.2008.09.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "653--662",
journal = "Environmental Science and Policy",
issn = "1462-9011",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Collaborative networks and new ways of knowing

AU - Lejano, Raul P.

AU - Ingram, Helen

PY - 2009/10

Y1 - 2009/10

N2 - To move beyond legal and regulatory gridlock around water issues in the California Bay-Delta, a new inter-agency initiative, commonly known as CALFED, was created in 1994. CALFED has been an ongoing experiment in policy innovation. Part of the change in management practice has involved constructing new arenas that engage multiple perspectives and transform regulatory impasse into provisional steps forward. We examine the construction of so-called boundary objects, which are forums and policy instruments that cross group boundaries and foster integrative deliberation. We compare the design and action of two boundary objects created by CALFED, namely the Environmental Water Account (EWA) and the Water Use Efficiency (WUE) program. We find that the presence of the boundary object, in itself, does little to explain the success of each policy experiment. Rather, the answer lies in the types of network interactions that result, along with the way meaning is coproduced. In fact, rather than create new patterns of interrelationship (e.g., between fish habitat advocates and pump station operators), the boundary object might further embed institutionalized routines. To more deeply understand what makes the new institution an integrative one, we introduce the concept of Ways of Knowing which explains how new knowledge emerges from the network of new relationships.

AB - To move beyond legal and regulatory gridlock around water issues in the California Bay-Delta, a new inter-agency initiative, commonly known as CALFED, was created in 1994. CALFED has been an ongoing experiment in policy innovation. Part of the change in management practice has involved constructing new arenas that engage multiple perspectives and transform regulatory impasse into provisional steps forward. We examine the construction of so-called boundary objects, which are forums and policy instruments that cross group boundaries and foster integrative deliberation. We compare the design and action of two boundary objects created by CALFED, namely the Environmental Water Account (EWA) and the Water Use Efficiency (WUE) program. We find that the presence of the boundary object, in itself, does little to explain the success of each policy experiment. Rather, the answer lies in the types of network interactions that result, along with the way meaning is coproduced. In fact, rather than create new patterns of interrelationship (e.g., between fish habitat advocates and pump station operators), the boundary object might further embed institutionalized routines. To more deeply understand what makes the new institution an integrative one, we introduce the concept of Ways of Knowing which explains how new knowledge emerges from the network of new relationships.

KW - CALFED

KW - Institutions

KW - Networks

KW - Policy analysis

KW - Water

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=69249124023&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=69249124023&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.envsci.2008.09.005

DO - 10.1016/j.envsci.2008.09.005

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:69249124023

VL - 12

SP - 653

EP - 662

JO - Environmental Science and Policy

JF - Environmental Science and Policy

SN - 1462-9011

IS - 6

ER -