Clinicians' training and interests in LE research

Mei Fu, Jane Armer, Saskia Thiadens, Vanessa Hurless, Joseph Feldman, Sheila Ridner, Jan Weiss, Patricia Meringer, Catherine Tuppo, Jospeh Meringer, Janice Cormier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: It is essential to understand clinicians' research training to advance the field of lymphoedema through continuous research and implementation of evidence-based practice. Aims: To investigate clinicians' training, interests, and opinions regarding lymphoedema research. Methods: A survey was conducted by the National Lymphedema Network (NLN) Research Committee from 2007-2009. A sample of NLN professional members was recruited. Descriptive and comparative data analyses were performed. Results: Among 317 clinicians who completed the survey, 52.4% had received some formal research training. The clinicians rated the most important obstacles for research were lack of funds, followed by lack of time and lack of knowledge. Clinicians rated that the most beneficial education programme should focus on performing clinical research in a busy clinic setting with limited resources. Over 80% of the clinicians expressed interests in research training on critical evaluation of current lymphoedema research, development of research ideas and clinical protocols, and writing fundable grants. Conclusions: This survey identified clinicians' research training needs and obstacles. Professional organisations may use this information to strategically plan educational opportunities and venues. Declaration of interest: None.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)24-29
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Lymphoedema
Volume6
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Lymphedema
Research
Organized Financing
Evidence-Based Practice
Financial Management
Clinical Protocols
Education
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Clinicians' perspective
  • Dissemination
  • Evidence-based practice
  • Lymphoedema
  • Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hematology

Cite this

Fu, M., Armer, J., Thiadens, S., Hurless, V., Feldman, J., Ridner, S., ... Cormier, J. (2011). Clinicians' training and interests in LE research. Journal of Lymphoedema, 6(1), 24-29.

Clinicians' training and interests in LE research. / Fu, Mei; Armer, Jane; Thiadens, Saskia; Hurless, Vanessa; Feldman, Joseph; Ridner, Sheila; Weiss, Jan; Meringer, Patricia; Tuppo, Catherine; Meringer, Jospeh; Cormier, Janice.

In: Journal of Lymphoedema, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2011, p. 24-29.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fu, M, Armer, J, Thiadens, S, Hurless, V, Feldman, J, Ridner, S, Weiss, J, Meringer, P, Tuppo, C, Meringer, J & Cormier, J 2011, 'Clinicians' training and interests in LE research', Journal of Lymphoedema, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 24-29.
Fu M, Armer J, Thiadens S, Hurless V, Feldman J, Ridner S et al. Clinicians' training and interests in LE research. Journal of Lymphoedema. 2011;6(1):24-29.
Fu, Mei ; Armer, Jane ; Thiadens, Saskia ; Hurless, Vanessa ; Feldman, Joseph ; Ridner, Sheila ; Weiss, Jan ; Meringer, Patricia ; Tuppo, Catherine ; Meringer, Jospeh ; Cormier, Janice. / Clinicians' training and interests in LE research. In: Journal of Lymphoedema. 2011 ; Vol. 6, No. 1. pp. 24-29.
@article{df62813a3b574c8585c9b50e9d693794,
title = "Clinicians' training and interests in LE research",
abstract = "Background: It is essential to understand clinicians' research training to advance the field of lymphoedema through continuous research and implementation of evidence-based practice. Aims: To investigate clinicians' training, interests, and opinions regarding lymphoedema research. Methods: A survey was conducted by the National Lymphedema Network (NLN) Research Committee from 2007-2009. A sample of NLN professional members was recruited. Descriptive and comparative data analyses were performed. Results: Among 317 clinicians who completed the survey, 52.4{\%} had received some formal research training. The clinicians rated the most important obstacles for research were lack of funds, followed by lack of time and lack of knowledge. Clinicians rated that the most beneficial education programme should focus on performing clinical research in a busy clinic setting with limited resources. Over 80{\%} of the clinicians expressed interests in research training on critical evaluation of current lymphoedema research, development of research ideas and clinical protocols, and writing fundable grants. Conclusions: This survey identified clinicians' research training needs and obstacles. Professional organisations may use this information to strategically plan educational opportunities and venues. Declaration of interest: None.",
keywords = "Clinicians' perspective, Dissemination, Evidence-based practice, Lymphoedema, Research",
author = "Mei Fu and Jane Armer and Saskia Thiadens and Vanessa Hurless and Joseph Feldman and Sheila Ridner and Jan Weiss and Patricia Meringer and Catherine Tuppo and Jospeh Meringer and Janice Cormier",
year = "2011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "24--29",
journal = "Journal of Lymphoedema",
issn = "1750-7235",
publisher = "Wounds UK",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinicians' training and interests in LE research

AU - Fu, Mei

AU - Armer, Jane

AU - Thiadens, Saskia

AU - Hurless, Vanessa

AU - Feldman, Joseph

AU - Ridner, Sheila

AU - Weiss, Jan

AU - Meringer, Patricia

AU - Tuppo, Catherine

AU - Meringer, Jospeh

AU - Cormier, Janice

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Background: It is essential to understand clinicians' research training to advance the field of lymphoedema through continuous research and implementation of evidence-based practice. Aims: To investigate clinicians' training, interests, and opinions regarding lymphoedema research. Methods: A survey was conducted by the National Lymphedema Network (NLN) Research Committee from 2007-2009. A sample of NLN professional members was recruited. Descriptive and comparative data analyses were performed. Results: Among 317 clinicians who completed the survey, 52.4% had received some formal research training. The clinicians rated the most important obstacles for research were lack of funds, followed by lack of time and lack of knowledge. Clinicians rated that the most beneficial education programme should focus on performing clinical research in a busy clinic setting with limited resources. Over 80% of the clinicians expressed interests in research training on critical evaluation of current lymphoedema research, development of research ideas and clinical protocols, and writing fundable grants. Conclusions: This survey identified clinicians' research training needs and obstacles. Professional organisations may use this information to strategically plan educational opportunities and venues. Declaration of interest: None.

AB - Background: It is essential to understand clinicians' research training to advance the field of lymphoedema through continuous research and implementation of evidence-based practice. Aims: To investigate clinicians' training, interests, and opinions regarding lymphoedema research. Methods: A survey was conducted by the National Lymphedema Network (NLN) Research Committee from 2007-2009. A sample of NLN professional members was recruited. Descriptive and comparative data analyses were performed. Results: Among 317 clinicians who completed the survey, 52.4% had received some formal research training. The clinicians rated the most important obstacles for research were lack of funds, followed by lack of time and lack of knowledge. Clinicians rated that the most beneficial education programme should focus on performing clinical research in a busy clinic setting with limited resources. Over 80% of the clinicians expressed interests in research training on critical evaluation of current lymphoedema research, development of research ideas and clinical protocols, and writing fundable grants. Conclusions: This survey identified clinicians' research training needs and obstacles. Professional organisations may use this information to strategically plan educational opportunities and venues. Declaration of interest: None.

KW - Clinicians' perspective

KW - Dissemination

KW - Evidence-based practice

KW - Lymphoedema

KW - Research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884401526&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884401526&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 24

EP - 29

JO - Journal of Lymphoedema

JF - Journal of Lymphoedema

SN - 1750-7235

IS - 1

ER -