Clinician Perspectives on the Benefits of Practice Facilitation for Small Primary Care Practices

Erin S. Rogers, Allison M. Cuthel, Carolyn Berry, Sue Kaplan, Donna R. Shelley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

PURPOSE: Small independent primary care practices (SIPs) often lack the resources to implement system changes. HealthyHearts NYC, funded through the EvidenceNOW initiative of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, studied the effectiveness of practice facilitation to improve cardiovascular disease- related care in 257 SIPs. We sought to understand SIP clinicians' perspectives on the benefits of practice facilitation. METHODS: We conducted in-depth interviews with 19 SIP clinicians enrolled in HealthyHearts NYC. Interviews were transcribed and coded using deductive and inductive approaches. To understand whether the perceived benefits of practice facilitation differ based on the availability of internal staff for quality improvement (QI), we compared themes pertaining to benefits between practices with 3 or fewer office staff vs more than 3 office staff. RESULTS: Clinicians perceived 2 main benefits of practice facilitation. First, facilitators served as a connection to the external health care environment for SIPs, often through teaching and information sharing. Second, facilitators provided electronic health record (EHR)/data expertise, often by teaching functionality and completing technical assistance and tasks. SIPs with more than 3 office staff felt that facilitators provided benefits primarily through teaching, whereas SIPs with 3 or fewer staff felt that facilitators also provided hands-on support. At the intersections of these benefits, there emerged 3 central practice facilitation benefits: (1) creating awareness of quality gaps, (2) connecting practices to information, resources, and strategies, and (3) optimizing the EHR for QI goals. CONCLUSIONS: SIP clinicians perceived practice facilitation to be an important resource for connecting their practice to the external health care environment and resources, and helping their practice build QI capacity through teaching, hands-on support, and EHR-driven solutions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S17-S23
JournalAnnals of family medicine
Volume17
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 12 2019

Fingerprint

Primary Health Care
Electronic Health Records
Teaching
Quality Improvement
Interviews
Delivery of Health Care
Information Dissemination
Health Resources
Health Services Research
Cardiovascular Diseases

Keywords

  • health information technology
  • organizational change
  • physician perspective
  • practice facilitation
  • practice transformation
  • practice-based research
  • primary care
  • professional practice
  • qualitative research
  • small independent primary care practices

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Family Practice

Cite this

Clinician Perspectives on the Benefits of Practice Facilitation for Small Primary Care Practices. / Rogers, Erin S.; Cuthel, Allison M.; Berry, Carolyn; Kaplan, Sue; Shelley, Donna R.

In: Annals of family medicine, Vol. 17, 12.08.2019, p. S17-S23.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5e24e5385f274b23ad4c234809e9a0ab,
title = "Clinician Perspectives on the Benefits of Practice Facilitation for Small Primary Care Practices",
abstract = "PURPOSE: Small independent primary care practices (SIPs) often lack the resources to implement system changes. HealthyHearts NYC, funded through the EvidenceNOW initiative of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, studied the effectiveness of practice facilitation to improve cardiovascular disease- related care in 257 SIPs. We sought to understand SIP clinicians' perspectives on the benefits of practice facilitation. METHODS: We conducted in-depth interviews with 19 SIP clinicians enrolled in HealthyHearts NYC. Interviews were transcribed and coded using deductive and inductive approaches. To understand whether the perceived benefits of practice facilitation differ based on the availability of internal staff for quality improvement (QI), we compared themes pertaining to benefits between practices with 3 or fewer office staff vs more than 3 office staff. RESULTS: Clinicians perceived 2 main benefits of practice facilitation. First, facilitators served as a connection to the external health care environment for SIPs, often through teaching and information sharing. Second, facilitators provided electronic health record (EHR)/data expertise, often by teaching functionality and completing technical assistance and tasks. SIPs with more than 3 office staff felt that facilitators provided benefits primarily through teaching, whereas SIPs with 3 or fewer staff felt that facilitators also provided hands-on support. At the intersections of these benefits, there emerged 3 central practice facilitation benefits: (1) creating awareness of quality gaps, (2) connecting practices to information, resources, and strategies, and (3) optimizing the EHR for QI goals. CONCLUSIONS: SIP clinicians perceived practice facilitation to be an important resource for connecting their practice to the external health care environment and resources, and helping their practice build QI capacity through teaching, hands-on support, and EHR-driven solutions.",
keywords = "health information technology, organizational change, physician perspective, practice facilitation, practice transformation, practice-based research, primary care, professional practice, qualitative research, small independent primary care practices",
author = "Rogers, {Erin S.} and Cuthel, {Allison M.} and Carolyn Berry and Sue Kaplan and Shelley, {Donna R.}",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1370/afm.2427",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "S17--S23",
journal = "Annals of Family Medicine",
issn = "1544-1709",
publisher = "Annals of Family Medicine, Inc",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinician Perspectives on the Benefits of Practice Facilitation for Small Primary Care Practices

AU - Rogers, Erin S.

AU - Cuthel, Allison M.

AU - Berry, Carolyn

AU - Kaplan, Sue

AU - Shelley, Donna R.

PY - 2019/8/12

Y1 - 2019/8/12

N2 - PURPOSE: Small independent primary care practices (SIPs) often lack the resources to implement system changes. HealthyHearts NYC, funded through the EvidenceNOW initiative of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, studied the effectiveness of practice facilitation to improve cardiovascular disease- related care in 257 SIPs. We sought to understand SIP clinicians' perspectives on the benefits of practice facilitation. METHODS: We conducted in-depth interviews with 19 SIP clinicians enrolled in HealthyHearts NYC. Interviews were transcribed and coded using deductive and inductive approaches. To understand whether the perceived benefits of practice facilitation differ based on the availability of internal staff for quality improvement (QI), we compared themes pertaining to benefits between practices with 3 or fewer office staff vs more than 3 office staff. RESULTS: Clinicians perceived 2 main benefits of practice facilitation. First, facilitators served as a connection to the external health care environment for SIPs, often through teaching and information sharing. Second, facilitators provided electronic health record (EHR)/data expertise, often by teaching functionality and completing technical assistance and tasks. SIPs with more than 3 office staff felt that facilitators provided benefits primarily through teaching, whereas SIPs with 3 or fewer staff felt that facilitators also provided hands-on support. At the intersections of these benefits, there emerged 3 central practice facilitation benefits: (1) creating awareness of quality gaps, (2) connecting practices to information, resources, and strategies, and (3) optimizing the EHR for QI goals. CONCLUSIONS: SIP clinicians perceived practice facilitation to be an important resource for connecting their practice to the external health care environment and resources, and helping their practice build QI capacity through teaching, hands-on support, and EHR-driven solutions.

AB - PURPOSE: Small independent primary care practices (SIPs) often lack the resources to implement system changes. HealthyHearts NYC, funded through the EvidenceNOW initiative of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, studied the effectiveness of practice facilitation to improve cardiovascular disease- related care in 257 SIPs. We sought to understand SIP clinicians' perspectives on the benefits of practice facilitation. METHODS: We conducted in-depth interviews with 19 SIP clinicians enrolled in HealthyHearts NYC. Interviews were transcribed and coded using deductive and inductive approaches. To understand whether the perceived benefits of practice facilitation differ based on the availability of internal staff for quality improvement (QI), we compared themes pertaining to benefits between practices with 3 or fewer office staff vs more than 3 office staff. RESULTS: Clinicians perceived 2 main benefits of practice facilitation. First, facilitators served as a connection to the external health care environment for SIPs, often through teaching and information sharing. Second, facilitators provided electronic health record (EHR)/data expertise, often by teaching functionality and completing technical assistance and tasks. SIPs with more than 3 office staff felt that facilitators provided benefits primarily through teaching, whereas SIPs with 3 or fewer staff felt that facilitators also provided hands-on support. At the intersections of these benefits, there emerged 3 central practice facilitation benefits: (1) creating awareness of quality gaps, (2) connecting practices to information, resources, and strategies, and (3) optimizing the EHR for QI goals. CONCLUSIONS: SIP clinicians perceived practice facilitation to be an important resource for connecting their practice to the external health care environment and resources, and helping their practice build QI capacity through teaching, hands-on support, and EHR-driven solutions.

KW - health information technology

KW - organizational change

KW - physician perspective

KW - practice facilitation

KW - practice transformation

KW - practice-based research

KW - primary care

KW - professional practice

KW - qualitative research

KW - small independent primary care practices

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072142014&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072142014&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1370/afm.2427

DO - 10.1370/afm.2427

M3 - Article

C2 - 31405872

AN - SCOPUS:85072142014

VL - 17

SP - S17-S23

JO - Annals of Family Medicine

JF - Annals of Family Medicine

SN - 1544-1709

ER -