Clinical Social Work, Science, and Doctoral Education: Schisms or Synergy?

Jeane W. Anastas

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Recent trends in social work have widened the schism between science and clinical social work. Ph.D. programs have become ever more oriented to grant-funded research and to preparing graduates for research-dominated careers. Academics have been developing a definition of a “science of social work” so the profession can claim its scientific base. The evidence-based practice movement and funders’ mandates to use evidence-supported practice techniques have created dilemmas for practitioners, whose views of these developments, positive and negative, are described. Some now argue for “practice-based research,” a model promoting practitioner involvement in research. Finally, rather than moving toward enhanced research and practice synergy in doctoral education, “practice doctorates” in social work are now being developed. Suggestions for enhancing connections between science and clinical social work are offered.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)304-312
    Number of pages9
    JournalClinical Social Work Journal
    Volume43
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Sep 7 2015

    Fingerprint

    synergy
    Social Work
    social work
    Education
    science
    Research
    education
    Organized Financing
    Evidence-Based Practice
    evidence
    grant
    profession
    graduate
    career
    trend

    Keywords

    • Clinical social work
    • Doctoral education in social work
    • Practice doctorate (DSW)
    • Practice-based evidence
    • Practitioners’ views of EBP
    • Science of social work

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Health(social science)
    • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

    Cite this

    Clinical Social Work, Science, and Doctoral Education : Schisms or Synergy? / Anastas, Jeane W.

    In: Clinical Social Work Journal, Vol. 43, No. 3, 07.09.2015, p. 304-312.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{bc59cd52a70a47f6a7e36bf94d31cb47,
    title = "Clinical Social Work, Science, and Doctoral Education: Schisms or Synergy?",
    abstract = "Recent trends in social work have widened the schism between science and clinical social work. Ph.D. programs have become ever more oriented to grant-funded research and to preparing graduates for research-dominated careers. Academics have been developing a definition of a “science of social work” so the profession can claim its scientific base. The evidence-based practice movement and funders’ mandates to use evidence-supported practice techniques have created dilemmas for practitioners, whose views of these developments, positive and negative, are described. Some now argue for “practice-based research,” a model promoting practitioner involvement in research. Finally, rather than moving toward enhanced research and practice synergy in doctoral education, “practice doctorates” in social work are now being developed. Suggestions for enhancing connections between science and clinical social work are offered.",
    keywords = "Clinical social work, Doctoral education in social work, Practice doctorate (DSW), Practice-based evidence, Practitioners’ views of EBP, Science of social work",
    author = "Anastas, {Jeane W.}",
    year = "2015",
    month = "9",
    day = "7",
    doi = "10.1007/s10615-015-0534-5",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "43",
    pages = "304--312",
    journal = "Clinical Social Work Journal",
    issn = "0091-1674",
    publisher = "Kluwer Academic/Human Sciences Press Inc.",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Clinical Social Work, Science, and Doctoral Education

    T2 - Schisms or Synergy?

    AU - Anastas, Jeane W.

    PY - 2015/9/7

    Y1 - 2015/9/7

    N2 - Recent trends in social work have widened the schism between science and clinical social work. Ph.D. programs have become ever more oriented to grant-funded research and to preparing graduates for research-dominated careers. Academics have been developing a definition of a “science of social work” so the profession can claim its scientific base. The evidence-based practice movement and funders’ mandates to use evidence-supported practice techniques have created dilemmas for practitioners, whose views of these developments, positive and negative, are described. Some now argue for “practice-based research,” a model promoting practitioner involvement in research. Finally, rather than moving toward enhanced research and practice synergy in doctoral education, “practice doctorates” in social work are now being developed. Suggestions for enhancing connections between science and clinical social work are offered.

    AB - Recent trends in social work have widened the schism between science and clinical social work. Ph.D. programs have become ever more oriented to grant-funded research and to preparing graduates for research-dominated careers. Academics have been developing a definition of a “science of social work” so the profession can claim its scientific base. The evidence-based practice movement and funders’ mandates to use evidence-supported practice techniques have created dilemmas for practitioners, whose views of these developments, positive and negative, are described. Some now argue for “practice-based research,” a model promoting practitioner involvement in research. Finally, rather than moving toward enhanced research and practice synergy in doctoral education, “practice doctorates” in social work are now being developed. Suggestions for enhancing connections between science and clinical social work are offered.

    KW - Clinical social work

    KW - Doctoral education in social work

    KW - Practice doctorate (DSW)

    KW - Practice-based evidence

    KW - Practitioners’ views of EBP

    KW - Science of social work

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938748736&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938748736&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1007/s10615-015-0534-5

    DO - 10.1007/s10615-015-0534-5

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:84938748736

    VL - 43

    SP - 304

    EP - 312

    JO - Clinical Social Work Journal

    JF - Clinical Social Work Journal

    SN - 0091-1674

    IS - 3

    ER -