Clinical disagreements during labor and birth: How does real life compare to best practice?

Kathleen Rice Simpson, Audrey Lyndon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To describe how nurses would respond in common clinical situations involving disagreement with physician colleagues during labor and birth. Study Design and Methods: An electronic survey, consisting of five clinical disagreement case scenarios along with two open-ended questions regarding how to promote effective interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, was administered via a secure Web site. Seven hundred four obstetric nurses in a mid-size metropolitan area were invited to participate via mail. One hundred thirty-three nurses responded. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis of open-ended text responses. Results: Respondents were primarily aged ≥40, experienced in labor nursing, and held a BSN; 35% were members of the Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses, 35% were certified in electronic fetal monitoring, and 33% were certified in inpatient obstetrics. In all five scenarios, most nurses were aware of current evidence and published standards of care (range 52%-86%). However, there was a wide discrepancy between current evidence/standards and what nurses indicated would occur in actual clinical practice. Clinical Implications: In this well-educated and knowledgeable sample of experienced labor nurses, reports of what would occur in clinical practice did not match current evidence or standards of care. Adequate nursing knowledge may not be an accurate predictor of appropriate clinical practice. Confidence in administrative support appears to be one of the key factors in empowering nurses to pursue resolution of disagreements in patients' best interests, whereas medical hierarchy, fear, and intimidation are significant barriers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)31-39
Number of pages9
JournalMCN The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2009

Fingerprint

Practice Guidelines
Nurses
Parturition
Obstetrics
Standard of Care
Nursing
Interdisciplinary Communication
Cardiotocography
Postal Service
Women's Health
Fear
Inpatients
Physicians

Keywords

  • Clinical disagreements
  • Disruptive behavior
  • Perinatal patient safety
  • Reasonably prudent nurses
  • Standards of care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Maternity and Midwifery
  • Pharmacology (nursing)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Clinical disagreements during labor and birth : How does real life compare to best practice? / Simpson, Kathleen Rice; Lyndon, Audrey.

In: MCN The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing, Vol. 34, No. 1, 01.01.2009, p. 31-39.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f29bc5cf792b4522931e1b311d833e68,
title = "Clinical disagreements during labor and birth: How does real life compare to best practice?",
abstract = "Purpose: To describe how nurses would respond in common clinical situations involving disagreement with physician colleagues during labor and birth. Study Design and Methods: An electronic survey, consisting of five clinical disagreement case scenarios along with two open-ended questions regarding how to promote effective interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, was administered via a secure Web site. Seven hundred four obstetric nurses in a mid-size metropolitan area were invited to participate via mail. One hundred thirty-three nurses responded. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis of open-ended text responses. Results: Respondents were primarily aged ≥40, experienced in labor nursing, and held a BSN; 35{\%} were members of the Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses, 35{\%} were certified in electronic fetal monitoring, and 33{\%} were certified in inpatient obstetrics. In all five scenarios, most nurses were aware of current evidence and published standards of care (range 52{\%}-86{\%}). However, there was a wide discrepancy between current evidence/standards and what nurses indicated would occur in actual clinical practice. Clinical Implications: In this well-educated and knowledgeable sample of experienced labor nurses, reports of what would occur in clinical practice did not match current evidence or standards of care. Adequate nursing knowledge may not be an accurate predictor of appropriate clinical practice. Confidence in administrative support appears to be one of the key factors in empowering nurses to pursue resolution of disagreements in patients' best interests, whereas medical hierarchy, fear, and intimidation are significant barriers.",
keywords = "Clinical disagreements, Disruptive behavior, Perinatal patient safety, Reasonably prudent nurses, Standards of care",
author = "Simpson, {Kathleen Rice} and Audrey Lyndon",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/01.NMC.0000343863.72237.2b",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "31--39",
journal = "MCN The American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing",
issn = "0361-929X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical disagreements during labor and birth

T2 - How does real life compare to best practice?

AU - Simpson, Kathleen Rice

AU - Lyndon, Audrey

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - Purpose: To describe how nurses would respond in common clinical situations involving disagreement with physician colleagues during labor and birth. Study Design and Methods: An electronic survey, consisting of five clinical disagreement case scenarios along with two open-ended questions regarding how to promote effective interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, was administered via a secure Web site. Seven hundred four obstetric nurses in a mid-size metropolitan area were invited to participate via mail. One hundred thirty-three nurses responded. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis of open-ended text responses. Results: Respondents were primarily aged ≥40, experienced in labor nursing, and held a BSN; 35% were members of the Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses, 35% were certified in electronic fetal monitoring, and 33% were certified in inpatient obstetrics. In all five scenarios, most nurses were aware of current evidence and published standards of care (range 52%-86%). However, there was a wide discrepancy between current evidence/standards and what nurses indicated would occur in actual clinical practice. Clinical Implications: In this well-educated and knowledgeable sample of experienced labor nurses, reports of what would occur in clinical practice did not match current evidence or standards of care. Adequate nursing knowledge may not be an accurate predictor of appropriate clinical practice. Confidence in administrative support appears to be one of the key factors in empowering nurses to pursue resolution of disagreements in patients' best interests, whereas medical hierarchy, fear, and intimidation are significant barriers.

AB - Purpose: To describe how nurses would respond in common clinical situations involving disagreement with physician colleagues during labor and birth. Study Design and Methods: An electronic survey, consisting of five clinical disagreement case scenarios along with two open-ended questions regarding how to promote effective interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, was administered via a secure Web site. Seven hundred four obstetric nurses in a mid-size metropolitan area were invited to participate via mail. One hundred thirty-three nurses responded. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis of open-ended text responses. Results: Respondents were primarily aged ≥40, experienced in labor nursing, and held a BSN; 35% were members of the Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses, 35% were certified in electronic fetal monitoring, and 33% were certified in inpatient obstetrics. In all five scenarios, most nurses were aware of current evidence and published standards of care (range 52%-86%). However, there was a wide discrepancy between current evidence/standards and what nurses indicated would occur in actual clinical practice. Clinical Implications: In this well-educated and knowledgeable sample of experienced labor nurses, reports of what would occur in clinical practice did not match current evidence or standards of care. Adequate nursing knowledge may not be an accurate predictor of appropriate clinical practice. Confidence in administrative support appears to be one of the key factors in empowering nurses to pursue resolution of disagreements in patients' best interests, whereas medical hierarchy, fear, and intimidation are significant barriers.

KW - Clinical disagreements

KW - Disruptive behavior

KW - Perinatal patient safety

KW - Reasonably prudent nurses

KW - Standards of care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=62749155407&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=62749155407&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.NMC.0000343863.72237.2b

DO - 10.1097/01.NMC.0000343863.72237.2b

M3 - Article

C2 - 19104317

AN - SCOPUS:62749155407

VL - 34

SP - 31

EP - 39

JO - MCN The American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing

JF - MCN The American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing

SN - 0361-929X

IS - 1

ER -