Clinical and histological evaluation of socket grafting using different types of bone substitute in adult patients

James Rudolph Collins, Ely Jiménez, Carol Martínez, Rubén Tobias Polanco, Ronaldo Hirata, Ramy Mousa, Paulo Coelho, Estevam A. Bonfante, Nick Tovar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

PURPOSE:: This clinical and histological study evaluated the healing of extraction sockets after implantation of a biphasic calcium sulfate (CS) alone or in combination with a gamma-radiated human mineralized allograft. MATERIALS AND METHODS:: Ten healthy adult patients participated in the study. A minimum of 2 teeth, per patient, extracted for different reasons were evaluated. Each socket was randomly filled to the crest with either (a) a biphasic CS or (b) large particulate gamma-radiated human mineralized allograft in combination with a biphasic CS. RESULTS:: No complications during reentry of the socket site during bone core retrieval, such as inflammation/immunogenic response, were observed. Histological findings showed a mean new bone (NB) of 33% for sockets filled with biphasic CS and 31% for sockets filled with biphasic CS in combination with allograft material. There was no statistically significant difference in the percentage of NB and the presence of soft tissue between graft materials. CONCLUSION:: Biphasic CS used alone or in combination with an allograft resulted in the same amount of NB formation in alveolar ridge preservation procedures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)489-495
Number of pages7
JournalImplant Dentistry
Volume23
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Bone Substitutes
Calcium Sulfate
Allografts
Bone and Bones
Alveolar Process
Osteogenesis
Tooth
Inflammation
Transplants

Keywords

  • bone regeneration
  • clinical
  • graft
  • socket preservation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oral Surgery

Cite this

Collins, J. R., Jiménez, E., Martínez, C., Polanco, R. T., Hirata, R., Mousa, R., ... Tovar, N. (2014). Clinical and histological evaluation of socket grafting using different types of bone substitute in adult patients. Implant Dentistry, 23(4), 489-495. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000106

Clinical and histological evaluation of socket grafting using different types of bone substitute in adult patients. / Collins, James Rudolph; Jiménez, Ely; Martínez, Carol; Polanco, Rubén Tobias; Hirata, Ronaldo; Mousa, Ramy; Coelho, Paulo; Bonfante, Estevam A.; Tovar, Nick.

In: Implant Dentistry, Vol. 23, No. 4, 2014, p. 489-495.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Collins, JR, Jiménez, E, Martínez, C, Polanco, RT, Hirata, R, Mousa, R, Coelho, P, Bonfante, EA & Tovar, N 2014, 'Clinical and histological evaluation of socket grafting using different types of bone substitute in adult patients', Implant Dentistry, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 489-495. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000106
Collins, James Rudolph ; Jiménez, Ely ; Martínez, Carol ; Polanco, Rubén Tobias ; Hirata, Ronaldo ; Mousa, Ramy ; Coelho, Paulo ; Bonfante, Estevam A. ; Tovar, Nick. / Clinical and histological evaluation of socket grafting using different types of bone substitute in adult patients. In: Implant Dentistry. 2014 ; Vol. 23, No. 4. pp. 489-495.
@article{c987368e8a2f4fe5b1d2fcde24cc3031,
title = "Clinical and histological evaluation of socket grafting using different types of bone substitute in adult patients",
abstract = "PURPOSE:: This clinical and histological study evaluated the healing of extraction sockets after implantation of a biphasic calcium sulfate (CS) alone or in combination with a gamma-radiated human mineralized allograft. MATERIALS AND METHODS:: Ten healthy adult patients participated in the study. A minimum of 2 teeth, per patient, extracted for different reasons were evaluated. Each socket was randomly filled to the crest with either (a) a biphasic CS or (b) large particulate gamma-radiated human mineralized allograft in combination with a biphasic CS. RESULTS:: No complications during reentry of the socket site during bone core retrieval, such as inflammation/immunogenic response, were observed. Histological findings showed a mean new bone (NB) of 33{\%} for sockets filled with biphasic CS and 31{\%} for sockets filled with biphasic CS in combination with allograft material. There was no statistically significant difference in the percentage of NB and the presence of soft tissue between graft materials. CONCLUSION:: Biphasic CS used alone or in combination with an allograft resulted in the same amount of NB formation in alveolar ridge preservation procedures.",
keywords = "bone regeneration, clinical, graft, socket preservation",
author = "Collins, {James Rudolph} and Ely Jim{\'e}nez and Carol Mart{\'i}nez and Polanco, {Rub{\'e}n Tobias} and Ronaldo Hirata and Ramy Mousa and Paulo Coelho and Bonfante, {Estevam A.} and Nick Tovar",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1097/ID.0000000000000106",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "489--495",
journal = "Implant Dentistry",
issn = "1056-6163",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical and histological evaluation of socket grafting using different types of bone substitute in adult patients

AU - Collins, James Rudolph

AU - Jiménez, Ely

AU - Martínez, Carol

AU - Polanco, Rubén Tobias

AU - Hirata, Ronaldo

AU - Mousa, Ramy

AU - Coelho, Paulo

AU - Bonfante, Estevam A.

AU - Tovar, Nick

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - PURPOSE:: This clinical and histological study evaluated the healing of extraction sockets after implantation of a biphasic calcium sulfate (CS) alone or in combination with a gamma-radiated human mineralized allograft. MATERIALS AND METHODS:: Ten healthy adult patients participated in the study. A minimum of 2 teeth, per patient, extracted for different reasons were evaluated. Each socket was randomly filled to the crest with either (a) a biphasic CS or (b) large particulate gamma-radiated human mineralized allograft in combination with a biphasic CS. RESULTS:: No complications during reentry of the socket site during bone core retrieval, such as inflammation/immunogenic response, were observed. Histological findings showed a mean new bone (NB) of 33% for sockets filled with biphasic CS and 31% for sockets filled with biphasic CS in combination with allograft material. There was no statistically significant difference in the percentage of NB and the presence of soft tissue between graft materials. CONCLUSION:: Biphasic CS used alone or in combination with an allograft resulted in the same amount of NB formation in alveolar ridge preservation procedures.

AB - PURPOSE:: This clinical and histological study evaluated the healing of extraction sockets after implantation of a biphasic calcium sulfate (CS) alone or in combination with a gamma-radiated human mineralized allograft. MATERIALS AND METHODS:: Ten healthy adult patients participated in the study. A minimum of 2 teeth, per patient, extracted for different reasons were evaluated. Each socket was randomly filled to the crest with either (a) a biphasic CS or (b) large particulate gamma-radiated human mineralized allograft in combination with a biphasic CS. RESULTS:: No complications during reentry of the socket site during bone core retrieval, such as inflammation/immunogenic response, were observed. Histological findings showed a mean new bone (NB) of 33% for sockets filled with biphasic CS and 31% for sockets filled with biphasic CS in combination with allograft material. There was no statistically significant difference in the percentage of NB and the presence of soft tissue between graft materials. CONCLUSION:: Biphasic CS used alone or in combination with an allograft resulted in the same amount of NB formation in alveolar ridge preservation procedures.

KW - bone regeneration

KW - clinical

KW - graft

KW - socket preservation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84905086634&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84905086634&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ID.0000000000000106

DO - 10.1097/ID.0000000000000106

M3 - Article

C2 - 25025854

AN - SCOPUS:84905086634

VL - 23

SP - 489

EP - 495

JO - Implant Dentistry

JF - Implant Dentistry

SN - 1056-6163

IS - 4

ER -