Climate model response from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP)

Ben Kravitz, Ken Caldeira, Olivier Boucher, Alan Robock, Philip J. Rasch, Kari Alterskjær, Diana Karam Francis, Jason N.S. Cole, Charles L. Curry, James M. Haywood, Peter J. Irvine, Duoying Ji, Andy Jones, Jõn Egill Kristjánsson, Daniel J. Lunt, John C. Moore, Ulrike Niemeier, Hauke Schmidt, Michael Schulz, Balwinder SinghSimone Tilmes, Shingo Watanabe, Shuting Yang, Jin Ho Yoon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Solar geoengineering - deliberate reduction in the amount of solar radiation retained by the Earth - has been proposed as a means of counteracting some of the climatic effects of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. We present results from Experiment G1 of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project, in which 12 climate models have simulated the climate response to an abrupt quadrupling of CO2 from preindustrial concentrations brought into radiative balance via a globally uniform reduction in insolation. Models show this reduction largely offsets global mean surface temperature increases due to quadrupled CO2 concentrations and prevents 97% of the Arctic sea ice loss that would otherwise occur under high CO2 levels but, compared to the preindustrial climate, leaves the tropics cooler (-0.3 K) and the poles warmer (+0.8 K). Annual mean precipitation minus evaporation anomalies for G1 are less than 0.2 mm day-1 in magnitude over 92% of the globe, but some tropical regions receive less precipitation, in part due to increased moist static stability and suppression of convection. Global average net primary productivity increases by 120% in G1 over simulated preindustrial levels, primarily from CO2 fertilization, but also in part due to reduced plant heat stress compared to a high CO2 world with no geoengineering. All models show that uniform solar geoengineering in G1 cannot simultaneously return regional and global temperature and hydrologic cycle intensity to preindustrial levels. Key Points Temperature reduction from uniform geoengineering is not uniform Geoengineering cannot offset both temperature and hydrology changes NPP increases mostly due to CO2 fertilization

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)8320-8332
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Volume118
Issue number15
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 16 2013

Fingerprint

environmental engineering
Climate models
climate models
climate modeling
fertilization
tropical regions
climate
static stability
Tropics
insolation
hydrology
Temperature
Incident solar radiation
globes
Sea ice
sea ice
Hydrology
temperature
tropics
greenhouses

Keywords

  • geoengineering
  • model intercomparison

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geophysics
  • Forestry
  • Oceanography
  • Aquatic Science
  • Ecology
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Soil Science
  • Geochemistry and Petrology
  • Earth-Surface Processes
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Space and Planetary Science
  • Palaeontology

Cite this

Kravitz, B., Caldeira, K., Boucher, O., Robock, A., Rasch, P. J., Alterskjær, K., ... Yoon, J. H. (2013). Climate model response from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP). Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 118(15), 8320-8332. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50646

Climate model response from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP). / Kravitz, Ben; Caldeira, Ken; Boucher, Olivier; Robock, Alan; Rasch, Philip J.; Alterskjær, Kari; Francis, Diana Karam; Cole, Jason N.S.; Curry, Charles L.; Haywood, James M.; Irvine, Peter J.; Ji, Duoying; Jones, Andy; Kristjánsson, Jõn Egill; Lunt, Daniel J.; Moore, John C.; Niemeier, Ulrike; Schmidt, Hauke; Schulz, Michael; Singh, Balwinder; Tilmes, Simone; Watanabe, Shingo; Yang, Shuting; Yoon, Jin Ho.

In: Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Vol. 118, No. 15, 16.08.2013, p. 8320-8332.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kravitz, B, Caldeira, K, Boucher, O, Robock, A, Rasch, PJ, Alterskjær, K, Francis, DK, Cole, JNS, Curry, CL, Haywood, JM, Irvine, PJ, Ji, D, Jones, A, Kristjánsson, JE, Lunt, DJ, Moore, JC, Niemeier, U, Schmidt, H, Schulz, M, Singh, B, Tilmes, S, Watanabe, S, Yang, S & Yoon, JH 2013, 'Climate model response from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP)', Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, vol. 118, no. 15, pp. 8320-8332. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50646
Kravitz B, Caldeira K, Boucher O, Robock A, Rasch PJ, Alterskjær K et al. Climate model response from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP). Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 2013 Aug 16;118(15):8320-8332. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50646
Kravitz, Ben ; Caldeira, Ken ; Boucher, Olivier ; Robock, Alan ; Rasch, Philip J. ; Alterskjær, Kari ; Francis, Diana Karam ; Cole, Jason N.S. ; Curry, Charles L. ; Haywood, James M. ; Irvine, Peter J. ; Ji, Duoying ; Jones, Andy ; Kristjánsson, Jõn Egill ; Lunt, Daniel J. ; Moore, John C. ; Niemeier, Ulrike ; Schmidt, Hauke ; Schulz, Michael ; Singh, Balwinder ; Tilmes, Simone ; Watanabe, Shingo ; Yang, Shuting ; Yoon, Jin Ho. / Climate model response from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP). In: Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 2013 ; Vol. 118, No. 15. pp. 8320-8332.
@article{c320bf1620e74c6aa012553a27970a03,
title = "Climate model response from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP)",
abstract = "Solar geoengineering - deliberate reduction in the amount of solar radiation retained by the Earth - has been proposed as a means of counteracting some of the climatic effects of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. We present results from Experiment G1 of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project, in which 12 climate models have simulated the climate response to an abrupt quadrupling of CO2 from preindustrial concentrations brought into radiative balance via a globally uniform reduction in insolation. Models show this reduction largely offsets global mean surface temperature increases due to quadrupled CO2 concentrations and prevents 97{\%} of the Arctic sea ice loss that would otherwise occur under high CO2 levels but, compared to the preindustrial climate, leaves the tropics cooler (-0.3 K) and the poles warmer (+0.8 K). Annual mean precipitation minus evaporation anomalies for G1 are less than 0.2 mm day-1 in magnitude over 92{\%} of the globe, but some tropical regions receive less precipitation, in part due to increased moist static stability and suppression of convection. Global average net primary productivity increases by 120{\%} in G1 over simulated preindustrial levels, primarily from CO2 fertilization, but also in part due to reduced plant heat stress compared to a high CO2 world with no geoengineering. All models show that uniform solar geoengineering in G1 cannot simultaneously return regional and global temperature and hydrologic cycle intensity to preindustrial levels. Key Points Temperature reduction from uniform geoengineering is not uniform Geoengineering cannot offset both temperature and hydrology changes NPP increases mostly due to CO2 fertilization",
keywords = "geoengineering, model intercomparison",
author = "Ben Kravitz and Ken Caldeira and Olivier Boucher and Alan Robock and Rasch, {Philip J.} and Kari Alterskj{\ae}r and Francis, {Diana Karam} and Cole, {Jason N.S.} and Curry, {Charles L.} and Haywood, {James M.} and Irvine, {Peter J.} and Duoying Ji and Andy Jones and Kristj{\'a}nsson, {J{\~o}n Egill} and Lunt, {Daniel J.} and Moore, {John C.} and Ulrike Niemeier and Hauke Schmidt and Michael Schulz and Balwinder Singh and Simone Tilmes and Shingo Watanabe and Shuting Yang and Yoon, {Jin Ho}",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1002/jgrd.50646",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "118",
pages = "8320--8332",
journal = "Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics",
issn = "0148-0227",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "15",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Climate model response from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP)

AU - Kravitz, Ben

AU - Caldeira, Ken

AU - Boucher, Olivier

AU - Robock, Alan

AU - Rasch, Philip J.

AU - Alterskjær, Kari

AU - Francis, Diana Karam

AU - Cole, Jason N.S.

AU - Curry, Charles L.

AU - Haywood, James M.

AU - Irvine, Peter J.

AU - Ji, Duoying

AU - Jones, Andy

AU - Kristjánsson, Jõn Egill

AU - Lunt, Daniel J.

AU - Moore, John C.

AU - Niemeier, Ulrike

AU - Schmidt, Hauke

AU - Schulz, Michael

AU - Singh, Balwinder

AU - Tilmes, Simone

AU - Watanabe, Shingo

AU - Yang, Shuting

AU - Yoon, Jin Ho

PY - 2013/8/16

Y1 - 2013/8/16

N2 - Solar geoengineering - deliberate reduction in the amount of solar radiation retained by the Earth - has been proposed as a means of counteracting some of the climatic effects of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. We present results from Experiment G1 of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project, in which 12 climate models have simulated the climate response to an abrupt quadrupling of CO2 from preindustrial concentrations brought into radiative balance via a globally uniform reduction in insolation. Models show this reduction largely offsets global mean surface temperature increases due to quadrupled CO2 concentrations and prevents 97% of the Arctic sea ice loss that would otherwise occur under high CO2 levels but, compared to the preindustrial climate, leaves the tropics cooler (-0.3 K) and the poles warmer (+0.8 K). Annual mean precipitation minus evaporation anomalies for G1 are less than 0.2 mm day-1 in magnitude over 92% of the globe, but some tropical regions receive less precipitation, in part due to increased moist static stability and suppression of convection. Global average net primary productivity increases by 120% in G1 over simulated preindustrial levels, primarily from CO2 fertilization, but also in part due to reduced plant heat stress compared to a high CO2 world with no geoengineering. All models show that uniform solar geoengineering in G1 cannot simultaneously return regional and global temperature and hydrologic cycle intensity to preindustrial levels. Key Points Temperature reduction from uniform geoengineering is not uniform Geoengineering cannot offset both temperature and hydrology changes NPP increases mostly due to CO2 fertilization

AB - Solar geoengineering - deliberate reduction in the amount of solar radiation retained by the Earth - has been proposed as a means of counteracting some of the climatic effects of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. We present results from Experiment G1 of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project, in which 12 climate models have simulated the climate response to an abrupt quadrupling of CO2 from preindustrial concentrations brought into radiative balance via a globally uniform reduction in insolation. Models show this reduction largely offsets global mean surface temperature increases due to quadrupled CO2 concentrations and prevents 97% of the Arctic sea ice loss that would otherwise occur under high CO2 levels but, compared to the preindustrial climate, leaves the tropics cooler (-0.3 K) and the poles warmer (+0.8 K). Annual mean precipitation minus evaporation anomalies for G1 are less than 0.2 mm day-1 in magnitude over 92% of the globe, but some tropical regions receive less precipitation, in part due to increased moist static stability and suppression of convection. Global average net primary productivity increases by 120% in G1 over simulated preindustrial levels, primarily from CO2 fertilization, but also in part due to reduced plant heat stress compared to a high CO2 world with no geoengineering. All models show that uniform solar geoengineering in G1 cannot simultaneously return regional and global temperature and hydrologic cycle intensity to preindustrial levels. Key Points Temperature reduction from uniform geoengineering is not uniform Geoengineering cannot offset both temperature and hydrology changes NPP increases mostly due to CO2 fertilization

KW - geoengineering

KW - model intercomparison

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884139342&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884139342&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jgrd.50646

DO - 10.1002/jgrd.50646

M3 - Article

VL - 118

SP - 8320

EP - 8332

JO - Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics

JF - Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics

SN - 0148-0227

IS - 15

ER -