Classifying children as ld: An analysis of current practice in an urban setting

Susan F. Tomasi, Sharon L. Weinberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A large number of states have continued to include a discrepancy criterion in their regulations for determining a child's learning disability status even though researchers have raised questions regarding the appropriateness of discrepancy formulas and the ability of clinicians to apply such formulas to quantitative data. Given the problems raised with the discrepancy model approach, one must question to what extent clinicians are, in fact, making decisions based upon this approach. This study sought to answer this question using data from 105 case files of predominantly African American children who had been classified as LD in a large, inner-city public school district and who had been receiving special education services for at least three years. Data are evaluated at both initial and triennial evaluations. Implications of results are discussed as are suggestions for future research. Requests for reprints should be addressed to: Sharon Weinberg, School of Education, New York University, 239 Greene Street, New York, NY 10003.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)31-42
Number of pages12
JournalLearning Disability Quarterly
Volume22
Issue number1
StatePublished - Dec 1999

Fingerprint

Special Education
Aptitude
Learning Disorders
African Americans
Decision Making
Research Personnel
Education
learning disability
special education
school
district
decision making
regulation
ability
evaluation
education
American

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Education
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Classifying children as ld : An analysis of current practice in an urban setting. / Tomasi, Susan F.; Weinberg, Sharon L.

In: Learning Disability Quarterly, Vol. 22, No. 1, 12.1999, p. 31-42.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a94b50da10d84d30b55d783532eaf288,
title = "Classifying children as ld: An analysis of current practice in an urban setting",
abstract = "A large number of states have continued to include a discrepancy criterion in their regulations for determining a child's learning disability status even though researchers have raised questions regarding the appropriateness of discrepancy formulas and the ability of clinicians to apply such formulas to quantitative data. Given the problems raised with the discrepancy model approach, one must question to what extent clinicians are, in fact, making decisions based upon this approach. This study sought to answer this question using data from 105 case files of predominantly African American children who had been classified as LD in a large, inner-city public school district and who had been receiving special education services for at least three years. Data are evaluated at both initial and triennial evaluations. Implications of results are discussed as are suggestions for future research. Requests for reprints should be addressed to: Sharon Weinberg, School of Education, New York University, 239 Greene Street, New York, NY 10003.",
author = "Tomasi, {Susan F.} and Weinberg, {Sharon L.}",
year = "1999",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "31--42",
journal = "Learning Disability Quarterly",
issn = "0731-9487",
publisher = "Council for Learning Disabilities",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Classifying children as ld

T2 - An analysis of current practice in an urban setting

AU - Tomasi, Susan F.

AU - Weinberg, Sharon L.

PY - 1999/12

Y1 - 1999/12

N2 - A large number of states have continued to include a discrepancy criterion in their regulations for determining a child's learning disability status even though researchers have raised questions regarding the appropriateness of discrepancy formulas and the ability of clinicians to apply such formulas to quantitative data. Given the problems raised with the discrepancy model approach, one must question to what extent clinicians are, in fact, making decisions based upon this approach. This study sought to answer this question using data from 105 case files of predominantly African American children who had been classified as LD in a large, inner-city public school district and who had been receiving special education services for at least three years. Data are evaluated at both initial and triennial evaluations. Implications of results are discussed as are suggestions for future research. Requests for reprints should be addressed to: Sharon Weinberg, School of Education, New York University, 239 Greene Street, New York, NY 10003.

AB - A large number of states have continued to include a discrepancy criterion in their regulations for determining a child's learning disability status even though researchers have raised questions regarding the appropriateness of discrepancy formulas and the ability of clinicians to apply such formulas to quantitative data. Given the problems raised with the discrepancy model approach, one must question to what extent clinicians are, in fact, making decisions based upon this approach. This study sought to answer this question using data from 105 case files of predominantly African American children who had been classified as LD in a large, inner-city public school district and who had been receiving special education services for at least three years. Data are evaluated at both initial and triennial evaluations. Implications of results are discussed as are suggestions for future research. Requests for reprints should be addressed to: Sharon Weinberg, School of Education, New York University, 239 Greene Street, New York, NY 10003.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033473004&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033473004&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0033473004

VL - 22

SP - 31

EP - 42

JO - Learning Disability Quarterly

JF - Learning Disability Quarterly

SN - 0731-9487

IS - 1

ER -