Classical fear conditioning in the anxiety disorders

A meta-analysis

Shmuel Lissek, Alice S. Powers, Erin B. McClure, Elizabeth A. Phelps, Girma Woldehawariat, Christian Grillon, Daniel S. Pine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Fear conditioning represents the process by which a neutral stimulus comes to evoke fear following its repeated pairing with an aversive stimulus. Although fear conditioning has long been considered a central pathogenic mechanism in anxiety disorders, studies employing lab-based conditioning paradigms provide inconsistent support for this idea. A quantitative review of 20 such studies, representing fear-learning scores for 453 anxiety patients and 455 healthy controls, was conducted to verify the aggregated result of this literature and to assess the moderating influences of study characteristics. Results point to modest increases in both acquisition of fear learning and conditioned responding during extinction among anxiety patients. Importantly, these patient-control differences are not apparent when looking at discrimination studies alone and primarily emerge from studies employing simple, single-cue paradigms where only danger cues are presented and no inhibition of fear to safety cues is required.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1391-1424
Number of pages34
JournalBehaviour Research and Therapy
Volume43
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2005

Fingerprint

Classical Conditioning
Anxiety Disorders
Fear
Meta-Analysis
Cues
Anxiety
Learning
Safety
Conditioning (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Anxiety disorders
  • Classical conditioning
  • Fear conditioning
  • Psychophysiology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Lissek, S., Powers, A. S., McClure, E. B., Phelps, E. A., Woldehawariat, G., Grillon, C., & Pine, D. S. (2005). Classical fear conditioning in the anxiety disorders: A meta-analysis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43(11), 1391-1424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2004.10.007

Classical fear conditioning in the anxiety disorders : A meta-analysis. / Lissek, Shmuel; Powers, Alice S.; McClure, Erin B.; Phelps, Elizabeth A.; Woldehawariat, Girma; Grillon, Christian; Pine, Daniel S.

In: Behaviour Research and Therapy, Vol. 43, No. 11, 11.2005, p. 1391-1424.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lissek, S, Powers, AS, McClure, EB, Phelps, EA, Woldehawariat, G, Grillon, C & Pine, DS 2005, 'Classical fear conditioning in the anxiety disorders: A meta-analysis', Behaviour Research and Therapy, vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 1391-1424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2004.10.007
Lissek, Shmuel ; Powers, Alice S. ; McClure, Erin B. ; Phelps, Elizabeth A. ; Woldehawariat, Girma ; Grillon, Christian ; Pine, Daniel S. / Classical fear conditioning in the anxiety disorders : A meta-analysis. In: Behaviour Research and Therapy. 2005 ; Vol. 43, No. 11. pp. 1391-1424.
@article{eb38bcf5941d4f169b5e1fc440971c08,
title = "Classical fear conditioning in the anxiety disorders: A meta-analysis",
abstract = "Fear conditioning represents the process by which a neutral stimulus comes to evoke fear following its repeated pairing with an aversive stimulus. Although fear conditioning has long been considered a central pathogenic mechanism in anxiety disorders, studies employing lab-based conditioning paradigms provide inconsistent support for this idea. A quantitative review of 20 such studies, representing fear-learning scores for 453 anxiety patients and 455 healthy controls, was conducted to verify the aggregated result of this literature and to assess the moderating influences of study characteristics. Results point to modest increases in both acquisition of fear learning and conditioned responding during extinction among anxiety patients. Importantly, these patient-control differences are not apparent when looking at discrimination studies alone and primarily emerge from studies employing simple, single-cue paradigms where only danger cues are presented and no inhibition of fear to safety cues is required.",
keywords = "Anxiety disorders, Classical conditioning, Fear conditioning, Psychophysiology",
author = "Shmuel Lissek and Powers, {Alice S.} and McClure, {Erin B.} and Phelps, {Elizabeth A.} and Girma Woldehawariat and Christian Grillon and Pine, {Daniel S.}",
year = "2005",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.brat.2004.10.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "1391--1424",
journal = "Behaviour Research and Therapy",
issn = "0005-7967",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Classical fear conditioning in the anxiety disorders

T2 - A meta-analysis

AU - Lissek, Shmuel

AU - Powers, Alice S.

AU - McClure, Erin B.

AU - Phelps, Elizabeth A.

AU - Woldehawariat, Girma

AU - Grillon, Christian

AU - Pine, Daniel S.

PY - 2005/11

Y1 - 2005/11

N2 - Fear conditioning represents the process by which a neutral stimulus comes to evoke fear following its repeated pairing with an aversive stimulus. Although fear conditioning has long been considered a central pathogenic mechanism in anxiety disorders, studies employing lab-based conditioning paradigms provide inconsistent support for this idea. A quantitative review of 20 such studies, representing fear-learning scores for 453 anxiety patients and 455 healthy controls, was conducted to verify the aggregated result of this literature and to assess the moderating influences of study characteristics. Results point to modest increases in both acquisition of fear learning and conditioned responding during extinction among anxiety patients. Importantly, these patient-control differences are not apparent when looking at discrimination studies alone and primarily emerge from studies employing simple, single-cue paradigms where only danger cues are presented and no inhibition of fear to safety cues is required.

AB - Fear conditioning represents the process by which a neutral stimulus comes to evoke fear following its repeated pairing with an aversive stimulus. Although fear conditioning has long been considered a central pathogenic mechanism in anxiety disorders, studies employing lab-based conditioning paradigms provide inconsistent support for this idea. A quantitative review of 20 such studies, representing fear-learning scores for 453 anxiety patients and 455 healthy controls, was conducted to verify the aggregated result of this literature and to assess the moderating influences of study characteristics. Results point to modest increases in both acquisition of fear learning and conditioned responding during extinction among anxiety patients. Importantly, these patient-control differences are not apparent when looking at discrimination studies alone and primarily emerge from studies employing simple, single-cue paradigms where only danger cues are presented and no inhibition of fear to safety cues is required.

KW - Anxiety disorders

KW - Classical conditioning

KW - Fear conditioning

KW - Psychophysiology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=24644459389&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=24644459389&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.brat.2004.10.007

DO - 10.1016/j.brat.2004.10.007

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 1391

EP - 1424

JO - Behaviour Research and Therapy

JF - Behaviour Research and Therapy

SN - 0005-7967

IS - 11

ER -