Citizen Attitudes Toward Traditional and State Authorities: Substitutes or Complements?

Peter van der Windt, Macartan Humphreys, Lily Medina, Jeffrey F. Timmons, Maarten Voors

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Do citizens view state and traditional authorities as substitutes or complements? Past work has been divided on this question. Some scholars point to competition between attitudes toward these entities, suggesting substitution, whereas others highlight positive correlations, suggesting complementarity. Addressing this question, however, is difficult, as it requires assessing the effects of exogenous changes in the latent valuation of one authority on an individual’s support for another. We show that this quantity—a type of elasticity—cannot be inferred from correlations between support for the two forms of authority. We employ a structural model to estimate this elasticity of substitution using data from 816 villages in the Democratic Republic of Congo and plausibly exogenous rainfall and conflict shocks. Despite prima facie evidence for substitution logics, our model’s outcomes are consistent with complementarity; positive changes in citizen valuation of the chief appear to translate into positive changes in support for the government.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalComparative Political Studies
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

state authority
substitution
citizen
Democratic Republic of the Congo
structural model
village
evidence

Keywords

  • central authority
  • Congo
  • social contract
  • traditional authority

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Citizen Attitudes Toward Traditional and State Authorities : Substitutes or Complements? / van der Windt, Peter; Humphreys, Macartan; Medina, Lily; Timmons, Jeffrey F.; Voors, Maarten.

In: Comparative Political Studies, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

van der Windt, Peter ; Humphreys, Macartan ; Medina, Lily ; Timmons, Jeffrey F. ; Voors, Maarten. / Citizen Attitudes Toward Traditional and State Authorities : Substitutes or Complements?. In: Comparative Political Studies. 2018.
@article{1f1898746b0a4f528e942d000ffac6c8,
title = "Citizen Attitudes Toward Traditional and State Authorities: Substitutes or Complements?",
abstract = "Do citizens view state and traditional authorities as substitutes or complements? Past work has been divided on this question. Some scholars point to competition between attitudes toward these entities, suggesting substitution, whereas others highlight positive correlations, suggesting complementarity. Addressing this question, however, is difficult, as it requires assessing the effects of exogenous changes in the latent valuation of one authority on an individual’s support for another. We show that this quantity—a type of elasticity—cannot be inferred from correlations between support for the two forms of authority. We employ a structural model to estimate this elasticity of substitution using data from 816 villages in the Democratic Republic of Congo and plausibly exogenous rainfall and conflict shocks. Despite prima facie evidence for substitution logics, our model’s outcomes are consistent with complementarity; positive changes in citizen valuation of the chief appear to translate into positive changes in support for the government.",
keywords = "central authority, Congo, social contract, traditional authority",
author = "{van der Windt}, Peter and Macartan Humphreys and Lily Medina and Timmons, {Jeffrey F.} and Maarten Voors",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0010414018806529",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Comparative Political Studies",
issn = "0010-4140",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Citizen Attitudes Toward Traditional and State Authorities

T2 - Substitutes or Complements?

AU - van der Windt, Peter

AU - Humphreys, Macartan

AU - Medina, Lily

AU - Timmons, Jeffrey F.

AU - Voors, Maarten

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Do citizens view state and traditional authorities as substitutes or complements? Past work has been divided on this question. Some scholars point to competition between attitudes toward these entities, suggesting substitution, whereas others highlight positive correlations, suggesting complementarity. Addressing this question, however, is difficult, as it requires assessing the effects of exogenous changes in the latent valuation of one authority on an individual’s support for another. We show that this quantity—a type of elasticity—cannot be inferred from correlations between support for the two forms of authority. We employ a structural model to estimate this elasticity of substitution using data from 816 villages in the Democratic Republic of Congo and plausibly exogenous rainfall and conflict shocks. Despite prima facie evidence for substitution logics, our model’s outcomes are consistent with complementarity; positive changes in citizen valuation of the chief appear to translate into positive changes in support for the government.

AB - Do citizens view state and traditional authorities as substitutes or complements? Past work has been divided on this question. Some scholars point to competition between attitudes toward these entities, suggesting substitution, whereas others highlight positive correlations, suggesting complementarity. Addressing this question, however, is difficult, as it requires assessing the effects of exogenous changes in the latent valuation of one authority on an individual’s support for another. We show that this quantity—a type of elasticity—cannot be inferred from correlations between support for the two forms of authority. We employ a structural model to estimate this elasticity of substitution using data from 816 villages in the Democratic Republic of Congo and plausibly exogenous rainfall and conflict shocks. Despite prima facie evidence for substitution logics, our model’s outcomes are consistent with complementarity; positive changes in citizen valuation of the chief appear to translate into positive changes in support for the government.

KW - central authority

KW - Congo

KW - social contract

KW - traditional authority

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059700786&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059700786&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0010414018806529

DO - 10.1177/0010414018806529

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85059700786

JO - Comparative Political Studies

JF - Comparative Political Studies

SN - 0010-4140

ER -