Circuit diagrams vs. Physical circuits

The effect of representational forms during assessment

Kayla DesPortes, Aditya Anupam, Neeti Pathak, Betsy DiSalvo

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Assessment of students' conceptual knowledge is a difficult task in all fields including electrical engineering. Recently, electrical engineering assessments have tried to isolate various types of knowledge through expert reviewed and validated tests or concept inventories, which attempt to cover the foundational concepts within a particular domain. While these tests have been fundamental in uncovering how students understand important concepts within specialties, they are traditionally administered on a static 2D interface without providing the students with tangible examples to think with or about. We report on a qualitative laboratory study to understand how different tools can change the possibilities and limitations of thinking with circuits. Specifically, we administer two versions of an assessment targeting concepts in direct current (DC) circuits in which students talked through their reasoning. One version represents the circuits as conventional symbolic diagrams, and the other version represents the circuits using physical circuit components connected with wires and solder. The participants conveyed several misconceptions within both forms with an even spread across each assessment. However, students exhibited the misconception of sequential reasoning more prevalently in the physical circuit assessment than the diagram assessment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationFIE 2016 - Frontiers in Education 2016
Subtitle of host publicationThe Crossroads of Engineering and Business
PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Volume2016-November
ISBN (Electronic)9781509017904
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 28 2016
Event46th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE 2016 - Erie, United States
Duration: Oct 12 2016Oct 15 2016

Other

Other46th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE 2016
CountryUnited States
CityErie
Period10/12/1610/15/16

Fingerprint

Networks (circuits)
Students
electrical engineering
Electrical engineering
student
Soldering alloys
Wire
expert

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Circuits
  • Electronics education
  • Hink-aloud

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Software
  • Education
  • Computer Science Applications

Cite this

DesPortes, K., Anupam, A., Pathak, N., & DiSalvo, B. (2016). Circuit diagrams vs. Physical circuits: The effect of representational forms during assessment. In FIE 2016 - Frontiers in Education 2016: The Crossroads of Engineering and Business (Vol. 2016-November). [7757381] Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2016.7757381

Circuit diagrams vs. Physical circuits : The effect of representational forms during assessment. / DesPortes, Kayla; Anupam, Aditya; Pathak, Neeti; DiSalvo, Betsy.

FIE 2016 - Frontiers in Education 2016: The Crossroads of Engineering and Business. Vol. 2016-November Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2016. 7757381.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

DesPortes, K, Anupam, A, Pathak, N & DiSalvo, B 2016, Circuit diagrams vs. Physical circuits: The effect of representational forms during assessment. in FIE 2016 - Frontiers in Education 2016: The Crossroads of Engineering and Business. vol. 2016-November, 7757381, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 46th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE 2016, Erie, United States, 10/12/16. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2016.7757381
DesPortes K, Anupam A, Pathak N, DiSalvo B. Circuit diagrams vs. Physical circuits: The effect of representational forms during assessment. In FIE 2016 - Frontiers in Education 2016: The Crossroads of Engineering and Business. Vol. 2016-November. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. 2016. 7757381 https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2016.7757381
DesPortes, Kayla ; Anupam, Aditya ; Pathak, Neeti ; DiSalvo, Betsy. / Circuit diagrams vs. Physical circuits : The effect of representational forms during assessment. FIE 2016 - Frontiers in Education 2016: The Crossroads of Engineering and Business. Vol. 2016-November Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2016.
@inproceedings{f7af51f03e374341b710a33a7df69104,
title = "Circuit diagrams vs. Physical circuits: The effect of representational forms during assessment",
abstract = "Assessment of students' conceptual knowledge is a difficult task in all fields including electrical engineering. Recently, electrical engineering assessments have tried to isolate various types of knowledge through expert reviewed and validated tests or concept inventories, which attempt to cover the foundational concepts within a particular domain. While these tests have been fundamental in uncovering how students understand important concepts within specialties, they are traditionally administered on a static 2D interface without providing the students with tangible examples to think with or about. We report on a qualitative laboratory study to understand how different tools can change the possibilities and limitations of thinking with circuits. Specifically, we administer two versions of an assessment targeting concepts in direct current (DC) circuits in which students talked through their reasoning. One version represents the circuits as conventional symbolic diagrams, and the other version represents the circuits using physical circuit components connected with wires and solder. The participants conveyed several misconceptions within both forms with an even spread across each assessment. However, students exhibited the misconception of sequential reasoning more prevalently in the physical circuit assessment than the diagram assessment.",
keywords = "Assessment, Circuits, Electronics education, Hink-aloud",
author = "Kayla DesPortes and Aditya Anupam and Neeti Pathak and Betsy DiSalvo",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1109/FIE.2016.7757381",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2016-November",
booktitle = "FIE 2016 - Frontiers in Education 2016",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Circuit diagrams vs. Physical circuits

T2 - The effect of representational forms during assessment

AU - DesPortes, Kayla

AU - Anupam, Aditya

AU - Pathak, Neeti

AU - DiSalvo, Betsy

PY - 2016/11/28

Y1 - 2016/11/28

N2 - Assessment of students' conceptual knowledge is a difficult task in all fields including electrical engineering. Recently, electrical engineering assessments have tried to isolate various types of knowledge through expert reviewed and validated tests or concept inventories, which attempt to cover the foundational concepts within a particular domain. While these tests have been fundamental in uncovering how students understand important concepts within specialties, they are traditionally administered on a static 2D interface without providing the students with tangible examples to think with or about. We report on a qualitative laboratory study to understand how different tools can change the possibilities and limitations of thinking with circuits. Specifically, we administer two versions of an assessment targeting concepts in direct current (DC) circuits in which students talked through their reasoning. One version represents the circuits as conventional symbolic diagrams, and the other version represents the circuits using physical circuit components connected with wires and solder. The participants conveyed several misconceptions within both forms with an even spread across each assessment. However, students exhibited the misconception of sequential reasoning more prevalently in the physical circuit assessment than the diagram assessment.

AB - Assessment of students' conceptual knowledge is a difficult task in all fields including electrical engineering. Recently, electrical engineering assessments have tried to isolate various types of knowledge through expert reviewed and validated tests or concept inventories, which attempt to cover the foundational concepts within a particular domain. While these tests have been fundamental in uncovering how students understand important concepts within specialties, they are traditionally administered on a static 2D interface without providing the students with tangible examples to think with or about. We report on a qualitative laboratory study to understand how different tools can change the possibilities and limitations of thinking with circuits. Specifically, we administer two versions of an assessment targeting concepts in direct current (DC) circuits in which students talked through their reasoning. One version represents the circuits as conventional symbolic diagrams, and the other version represents the circuits using physical circuit components connected with wires and solder. The participants conveyed several misconceptions within both forms with an even spread across each assessment. However, students exhibited the misconception of sequential reasoning more prevalently in the physical circuit assessment than the diagram assessment.

KW - Assessment

KW - Circuits

KW - Electronics education

KW - Hink-aloud

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006716962&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85006716962&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/FIE.2016.7757381

DO - 10.1109/FIE.2016.7757381

M3 - Conference contribution

VL - 2016-November

BT - FIE 2016 - Frontiers in Education 2016

PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.

ER -