Child passenger safety laws in the United States, 1978-2010

Policy diffusion in the absence of strong federal intervention

Jin Yung Bae, Evan Anderson, Diana Silver, James Macinko

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article examines the diffusion of U.S. state child passenger safety laws, analyzing over-time changes and inter-state differences in all identifiable features of laws that plausibly influence crash-related morbidity and mortality. The observed trend shows many states' continuing efforts to update their laws to be consistent with latest motor vehicle safety recommendations, with each state modifying their laws on average 6 times over the 30-year period. However, there has been a considerable time lag in knowledge diffusion and policy adoption. Even though empirical evidence supporting the protective effect of child restraint devices was available in the early 1970s, laws requiring their use were not adopted by all 50 states until 1986. For laws requiring minors to be seated in rear seats, the first state law adoption did not occur until two decades after the evidence became publicly available. As of 2010, only 12 states explicitly required the use of booster seats, 9 for infant seats and 6 for toddler seats. There is also great variation among states in defining the child population to be covered by the laws, the vehicle operators subject to compliance, and the penalties resulting from non-compliance. Some states cover only up to 4-year-olds while others cover children up to age 17. As of 2010, states have as many as 14 exemptions, such as those for non-residents, non-parents, commercial vehicles, large vehicles, or vehicles without seatbelts. Factors such as the complexity of the state of the science, the changing nature of guidelines (from age to height/weight-related criteria), and the absence of coordinated federal actions are potential explanations for the observed patterns. The resulting uneven policy landscape among states suggests a strong need for improved communication among state legislators, public health researchers, advocates and concerned citizen groups to promote more efficient and effective policymaking.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)30-37
Number of pages8
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Volume100
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2014

Fingerprint

Safety
Law
Minors
Motor Vehicles
Action Potentials
Compliance
Public Health
Communication
Research Personnel
Guidelines
Morbidity
Weights and Measures
exemption
Equipment and Supplies
state law
Mortality
morbidity
motor vehicle
evidence
penalty

Keywords

  • Child passenger safety law
  • Child restraint
  • Policy diffusion
  • Public health law
  • Seatbelt law
  • Traffic safety
  • United States

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

Child passenger safety laws in the United States, 1978-2010 : Policy diffusion in the absence of strong federal intervention. / Bae, Jin Yung; Anderson, Evan; Silver, Diana; Macinko, James.

In: Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 100, 01.2014, p. 30-37.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3b30ceb5ff4d4074a5da36cf81907c3a,
title = "Child passenger safety laws in the United States, 1978-2010: Policy diffusion in the absence of strong federal intervention",
abstract = "This article examines the diffusion of U.S. state child passenger safety laws, analyzing over-time changes and inter-state differences in all identifiable features of laws that plausibly influence crash-related morbidity and mortality. The observed trend shows many states' continuing efforts to update their laws to be consistent with latest motor vehicle safety recommendations, with each state modifying their laws on average 6 times over the 30-year period. However, there has been a considerable time lag in knowledge diffusion and policy adoption. Even though empirical evidence supporting the protective effect of child restraint devices was available in the early 1970s, laws requiring their use were not adopted by all 50 states until 1986. For laws requiring minors to be seated in rear seats, the first state law adoption did not occur until two decades after the evidence became publicly available. As of 2010, only 12 states explicitly required the use of booster seats, 9 for infant seats and 6 for toddler seats. There is also great variation among states in defining the child population to be covered by the laws, the vehicle operators subject to compliance, and the penalties resulting from non-compliance. Some states cover only up to 4-year-olds while others cover children up to age 17. As of 2010, states have as many as 14 exemptions, such as those for non-residents, non-parents, commercial vehicles, large vehicles, or vehicles without seatbelts. Factors such as the complexity of the state of the science, the changing nature of guidelines (from age to height/weight-related criteria), and the absence of coordinated federal actions are potential explanations for the observed patterns. The resulting uneven policy landscape among states suggests a strong need for improved communication among state legislators, public health researchers, advocates and concerned citizen groups to promote more efficient and effective policymaking.",
keywords = "Child passenger safety law, Child restraint, Policy diffusion, Public health law, Seatbelt law, Traffic safety, United States",
author = "Bae, {Jin Yung} and Evan Anderson and Diana Silver and James Macinko",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.10.035",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "100",
pages = "30--37",
journal = "Social Science and Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Child passenger safety laws in the United States, 1978-2010

T2 - Policy diffusion in the absence of strong federal intervention

AU - Bae, Jin Yung

AU - Anderson, Evan

AU - Silver, Diana

AU - Macinko, James

PY - 2014/1

Y1 - 2014/1

N2 - This article examines the diffusion of U.S. state child passenger safety laws, analyzing over-time changes and inter-state differences in all identifiable features of laws that plausibly influence crash-related morbidity and mortality. The observed trend shows many states' continuing efforts to update their laws to be consistent with latest motor vehicle safety recommendations, with each state modifying their laws on average 6 times over the 30-year period. However, there has been a considerable time lag in knowledge diffusion and policy adoption. Even though empirical evidence supporting the protective effect of child restraint devices was available in the early 1970s, laws requiring their use were not adopted by all 50 states until 1986. For laws requiring minors to be seated in rear seats, the first state law adoption did not occur until two decades after the evidence became publicly available. As of 2010, only 12 states explicitly required the use of booster seats, 9 for infant seats and 6 for toddler seats. There is also great variation among states in defining the child population to be covered by the laws, the vehicle operators subject to compliance, and the penalties resulting from non-compliance. Some states cover only up to 4-year-olds while others cover children up to age 17. As of 2010, states have as many as 14 exemptions, such as those for non-residents, non-parents, commercial vehicles, large vehicles, or vehicles without seatbelts. Factors such as the complexity of the state of the science, the changing nature of guidelines (from age to height/weight-related criteria), and the absence of coordinated federal actions are potential explanations for the observed patterns. The resulting uneven policy landscape among states suggests a strong need for improved communication among state legislators, public health researchers, advocates and concerned citizen groups to promote more efficient and effective policymaking.

AB - This article examines the diffusion of U.S. state child passenger safety laws, analyzing over-time changes and inter-state differences in all identifiable features of laws that plausibly influence crash-related morbidity and mortality. The observed trend shows many states' continuing efforts to update their laws to be consistent with latest motor vehicle safety recommendations, with each state modifying their laws on average 6 times over the 30-year period. However, there has been a considerable time lag in knowledge diffusion and policy adoption. Even though empirical evidence supporting the protective effect of child restraint devices was available in the early 1970s, laws requiring their use were not adopted by all 50 states until 1986. For laws requiring minors to be seated in rear seats, the first state law adoption did not occur until two decades after the evidence became publicly available. As of 2010, only 12 states explicitly required the use of booster seats, 9 for infant seats and 6 for toddler seats. There is also great variation among states in defining the child population to be covered by the laws, the vehicle operators subject to compliance, and the penalties resulting from non-compliance. Some states cover only up to 4-year-olds while others cover children up to age 17. As of 2010, states have as many as 14 exemptions, such as those for non-residents, non-parents, commercial vehicles, large vehicles, or vehicles without seatbelts. Factors such as the complexity of the state of the science, the changing nature of guidelines (from age to height/weight-related criteria), and the absence of coordinated federal actions are potential explanations for the observed patterns. The resulting uneven policy landscape among states suggests a strong need for improved communication among state legislators, public health researchers, advocates and concerned citizen groups to promote more efficient and effective policymaking.

KW - Child passenger safety law

KW - Child restraint

KW - Policy diffusion

KW - Public health law

KW - Seatbelt law

KW - Traffic safety

KW - United States

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892513517&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892513517&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.10.035

DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.10.035

M3 - Article

VL - 100

SP - 30

EP - 37

JO - Social Science and Medicine

JF - Social Science and Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

ER -