Child Conduct Problems Across Home and School Contexts

a Person-Centered Approach

The Family Life Project Investigators

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

To examine patterns of conduct problems across the home and school context, we used latent class analysis to analyze primary caregivers’ and teachers’ ratings on the conduct problems subscale of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (Goodman Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 581–586, 1997) in the Family Life Project (N = 1,292), a prospective study of child development in rural and small town contexts. We found a similar four-class solution at 5 and 7 years of age. In decreasing prevalence, the following classes were identified: (1) low symptoms reported by both informants (low cross-context); (2) high parent-reported symptoms, low teacher-reported symptoms (home context); (3) low parent-reported symptoms, moderate teacher-reported symptoms (school context); and (4) high symptoms reported by both informants (high cross-context). Classes exhibited stability from age five to age seven: children were more likely to remain in the same class than to transition to a different class, and longitudinal stability was especially high for children in the low cross-context class at age 5. A number of child and family characteristics measured in early childhood (executive function, verbal ability, poverty-related risk, sensitive parenting, and parental depressive symptoms) were associated with class membership at age five and age seven, but were generally not associated with longitudinal transitions between classes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-12
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Sep 6 2016

Fingerprint

Child Psychology
Child Psychiatry
Aptitude
Executive Function
Parenting
Poverty
Child Development
Caregivers
Prospective Studies
Depression
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Conduct problems
  • Externalizing symptoms
  • Latent class analysis
  • Longitudinal
  • Strengths and difficulties questionnaire

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Child Conduct Problems Across Home and School Contexts : a Person-Centered Approach. / The Family Life Project Investigators.

In: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 06.09.2016, p. 1-12.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e30a29a8d91f4893a76ed0f72d15c320,
title = "Child Conduct Problems Across Home and School Contexts: a Person-Centered Approach",
abstract = "To examine patterns of conduct problems across the home and school context, we used latent class analysis to analyze primary caregivers’ and teachers’ ratings on the conduct problems subscale of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (Goodman Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 581–586, 1997) in the Family Life Project (N = 1,292), a prospective study of child development in rural and small town contexts. We found a similar four-class solution at 5 and 7 years of age. In decreasing prevalence, the following classes were identified: (1) low symptoms reported by both informants (low cross-context); (2) high parent-reported symptoms, low teacher-reported symptoms (home context); (3) low parent-reported symptoms, moderate teacher-reported symptoms (school context); and (4) high symptoms reported by both informants (high cross-context). Classes exhibited stability from age five to age seven: children were more likely to remain in the same class than to transition to a different class, and longitudinal stability was especially high for children in the low cross-context class at age 5. A number of child and family characteristics measured in early childhood (executive function, verbal ability, poverty-related risk, sensitive parenting, and parental depressive symptoms) were associated with class membership at age five and age seven, but were generally not associated with longitudinal transitions between classes.",
keywords = "Conduct problems, Externalizing symptoms, Latent class analysis, Longitudinal, Strengths and difficulties questionnaire",
author = "{The Family Life Project Investigators} and Sulik, {Michael J.} and Clancy Blair and Mark Greenberg and Lynne Vernon-Feagans and Greenberg, {Mark T.} and Blair, {Clancy B.} and Burchinal, {Margaret R.} and Martha Cox and Garrett-Peters, {Patricia T.} and Frank, {Jennifer L.} and Mills-Koonce, {W. Roger} and Willoughby, {Michael T.}",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s10862-016-9564-8",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--12",
journal = "Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment",
issn = "0882-2689",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Child Conduct Problems Across Home and School Contexts

T2 - a Person-Centered Approach

AU - The Family Life Project Investigators

AU - Sulik, Michael J.

AU - Blair, Clancy

AU - Greenberg, Mark

AU - Vernon-Feagans, Lynne

AU - Greenberg, Mark T.

AU - Blair, Clancy B.

AU - Burchinal, Margaret R.

AU - Cox, Martha

AU - Garrett-Peters, Patricia T.

AU - Frank, Jennifer L.

AU - Mills-Koonce, W. Roger

AU - Willoughby, Michael T.

PY - 2016/9/6

Y1 - 2016/9/6

N2 - To examine patterns of conduct problems across the home and school context, we used latent class analysis to analyze primary caregivers’ and teachers’ ratings on the conduct problems subscale of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (Goodman Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 581–586, 1997) in the Family Life Project (N = 1,292), a prospective study of child development in rural and small town contexts. We found a similar four-class solution at 5 and 7 years of age. In decreasing prevalence, the following classes were identified: (1) low symptoms reported by both informants (low cross-context); (2) high parent-reported symptoms, low teacher-reported symptoms (home context); (3) low parent-reported symptoms, moderate teacher-reported symptoms (school context); and (4) high symptoms reported by both informants (high cross-context). Classes exhibited stability from age five to age seven: children were more likely to remain in the same class than to transition to a different class, and longitudinal stability was especially high for children in the low cross-context class at age 5. A number of child and family characteristics measured in early childhood (executive function, verbal ability, poverty-related risk, sensitive parenting, and parental depressive symptoms) were associated with class membership at age five and age seven, but were generally not associated with longitudinal transitions between classes.

AB - To examine patterns of conduct problems across the home and school context, we used latent class analysis to analyze primary caregivers’ and teachers’ ratings on the conduct problems subscale of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (Goodman Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 581–586, 1997) in the Family Life Project (N = 1,292), a prospective study of child development in rural and small town contexts. We found a similar four-class solution at 5 and 7 years of age. In decreasing prevalence, the following classes were identified: (1) low symptoms reported by both informants (low cross-context); (2) high parent-reported symptoms, low teacher-reported symptoms (home context); (3) low parent-reported symptoms, moderate teacher-reported symptoms (school context); and (4) high symptoms reported by both informants (high cross-context). Classes exhibited stability from age five to age seven: children were more likely to remain in the same class than to transition to a different class, and longitudinal stability was especially high for children in the low cross-context class at age 5. A number of child and family characteristics measured in early childhood (executive function, verbal ability, poverty-related risk, sensitive parenting, and parental depressive symptoms) were associated with class membership at age five and age seven, but were generally not associated with longitudinal transitions between classes.

KW - Conduct problems

KW - Externalizing symptoms

KW - Latent class analysis

KW - Longitudinal

KW - Strengths and difficulties questionnaire

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84986557938&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84986557938&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10862-016-9564-8

DO - 10.1007/s10862-016-9564-8

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 12

JO - Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment

JF - Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment

SN - 0882-2689

ER -