Chemogenetic Inhibition Reveals That Processing Relative But Not Absolute Threat Requires Basal Amygdala

Vincent D. Campese, Ian T. Kim, Mian Hou, Saurav Gupta, Cassandra Draus, Botagoz Kurpas, Kelsey Burke, Joseph E. LeDoux

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

While our understanding of appetitive motivation has benefited immensely from the use of selective outcome devaluation tools, the same cannot be said about aversive motivation. Findings from appetitive conditioning studies have shown that basal amygdala is required for behaviors that are sensitive to updates in outcome value, but similar results in aversive motivation are difficult to interpret due to a lack of outcome specificity. The studies reported here sought to develop procedures to isolate sensory-specific processes in aversive learning and behavior and to assess the possible contribution of the basal amygdala. Post-training changes to outcome value produced commensurate changes to subsequently tested conditioned responding in male rodents. Specifically, increases in shock intensity (i.e., inflation) augmented, while repeated exposure to (i.e., habituation of) an aversive sound (klaxon-horn) reduced freezing to conditioned stimuli previously paired with these outcomes. This was extended to a discriminative procedure, in which following revaluation of one event, but not the other, responding was found to be dependent on outcome value signaled by each cue. Chemogenetic inactivation of basal amygdala impaired this discrimination between stimuli signaling differently valued outcomes, but did not affect the revaluation process itself. These findings demonstrate a contribution of the basal amygdala to aversive outcome-dependent motivational processes.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The specific content of pavlovian associative learning has been well studied in appetitive motivation, where the value of different foods can be easily manipulated. This has facilitated our understanding of the neural circuits that generate different forms of motivation (i.e., sensory specific vs general). Studies of aversive learning have not produced the same degree of understanding with regard to sensory specificity due to a lack of tools for evaluating sensory-specific processes. Here we use a variant of outcome devaluation procedures with aversive stimuli to study the role of basal amygdala in discriminating between aversive stimuli conveying different degrees of threat. These findings have implications for how we study generalized threat to identify dysregulation that can contribute to generalized anxiety.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)8510-8516
Number of pages7
JournalThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience
Volume39
Issue number43
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 23 2019

Fingerprint

Amygdala
Motivation
Learning
Economic Inflation
Horns
Freezing
Cues
Rodentia
Shock
Anxiety
Inhibition (Psychology)
Food

Keywords

  • aversive
  • devaluation
  • discrimination
  • motivation
  • salience
  • value

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Chemogenetic Inhibition Reveals That Processing Relative But Not Absolute Threat Requires Basal Amygdala. / Campese, Vincent D.; Kim, Ian T.; Hou, Mian; Gupta, Saurav; Draus, Cassandra; Kurpas, Botagoz; Burke, Kelsey; LeDoux, Joseph E.

In: The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, Vol. 39, No. 43, 23.10.2019, p. 8510-8516.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Campese, Vincent D. ; Kim, Ian T. ; Hou, Mian ; Gupta, Saurav ; Draus, Cassandra ; Kurpas, Botagoz ; Burke, Kelsey ; LeDoux, Joseph E. / Chemogenetic Inhibition Reveals That Processing Relative But Not Absolute Threat Requires Basal Amygdala. In: The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2019 ; Vol. 39, No. 43. pp. 8510-8516.
@article{462639cb7cb04b94ace0bd44a84e4c1f,
title = "Chemogenetic Inhibition Reveals That Processing Relative But Not Absolute Threat Requires Basal Amygdala",
abstract = "While our understanding of appetitive motivation has benefited immensely from the use of selective outcome devaluation tools, the same cannot be said about aversive motivation. Findings from appetitive conditioning studies have shown that basal amygdala is required for behaviors that are sensitive to updates in outcome value, but similar results in aversive motivation are difficult to interpret due to a lack of outcome specificity. The studies reported here sought to develop procedures to isolate sensory-specific processes in aversive learning and behavior and to assess the possible contribution of the basal amygdala. Post-training changes to outcome value produced commensurate changes to subsequently tested conditioned responding in male rodents. Specifically, increases in shock intensity (i.e., inflation) augmented, while repeated exposure to (i.e., habituation of) an aversive sound (klaxon-horn) reduced freezing to conditioned stimuli previously paired with these outcomes. This was extended to a discriminative procedure, in which following revaluation of one event, but not the other, responding was found to be dependent on outcome value signaled by each cue. Chemogenetic inactivation of basal amygdala impaired this discrimination between stimuli signaling differently valued outcomes, but did not affect the revaluation process itself. These findings demonstrate a contribution of the basal amygdala to aversive outcome-dependent motivational processes.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The specific content of pavlovian associative learning has been well studied in appetitive motivation, where the value of different foods can be easily manipulated. This has facilitated our understanding of the neural circuits that generate different forms of motivation (i.e., sensory specific vs general). Studies of aversive learning have not produced the same degree of understanding with regard to sensory specificity due to a lack of tools for evaluating sensory-specific processes. Here we use a variant of outcome devaluation procedures with aversive stimuli to study the role of basal amygdala in discriminating between aversive stimuli conveying different degrees of threat. These findings have implications for how we study generalized threat to identify dysregulation that can contribute to generalized anxiety.",
keywords = "aversive, devaluation, discrimination, motivation, salience, value",
author = "Campese, {Vincent D.} and Kim, {Ian T.} and Mian Hou and Saurav Gupta and Cassandra Draus and Botagoz Kurpas and Kelsey Burke and LeDoux, {Joseph E.}",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2530-18.2019",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "8510--8516",
journal = "Journal of Neuroscience",
issn = "0270-6474",
publisher = "Society for Neuroscience",
number = "43",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Chemogenetic Inhibition Reveals That Processing Relative But Not Absolute Threat Requires Basal Amygdala

AU - Campese, Vincent D.

AU - Kim, Ian T.

AU - Hou, Mian

AU - Gupta, Saurav

AU - Draus, Cassandra

AU - Kurpas, Botagoz

AU - Burke, Kelsey

AU - LeDoux, Joseph E.

PY - 2019/10/23

Y1 - 2019/10/23

N2 - While our understanding of appetitive motivation has benefited immensely from the use of selective outcome devaluation tools, the same cannot be said about aversive motivation. Findings from appetitive conditioning studies have shown that basal amygdala is required for behaviors that are sensitive to updates in outcome value, but similar results in aversive motivation are difficult to interpret due to a lack of outcome specificity. The studies reported here sought to develop procedures to isolate sensory-specific processes in aversive learning and behavior and to assess the possible contribution of the basal amygdala. Post-training changes to outcome value produced commensurate changes to subsequently tested conditioned responding in male rodents. Specifically, increases in shock intensity (i.e., inflation) augmented, while repeated exposure to (i.e., habituation of) an aversive sound (klaxon-horn) reduced freezing to conditioned stimuli previously paired with these outcomes. This was extended to a discriminative procedure, in which following revaluation of one event, but not the other, responding was found to be dependent on outcome value signaled by each cue. Chemogenetic inactivation of basal amygdala impaired this discrimination between stimuli signaling differently valued outcomes, but did not affect the revaluation process itself. These findings demonstrate a contribution of the basal amygdala to aversive outcome-dependent motivational processes.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The specific content of pavlovian associative learning has been well studied in appetitive motivation, where the value of different foods can be easily manipulated. This has facilitated our understanding of the neural circuits that generate different forms of motivation (i.e., sensory specific vs general). Studies of aversive learning have not produced the same degree of understanding with regard to sensory specificity due to a lack of tools for evaluating sensory-specific processes. Here we use a variant of outcome devaluation procedures with aversive stimuli to study the role of basal amygdala in discriminating between aversive stimuli conveying different degrees of threat. These findings have implications for how we study generalized threat to identify dysregulation that can contribute to generalized anxiety.

AB - While our understanding of appetitive motivation has benefited immensely from the use of selective outcome devaluation tools, the same cannot be said about aversive motivation. Findings from appetitive conditioning studies have shown that basal amygdala is required for behaviors that are sensitive to updates in outcome value, but similar results in aversive motivation are difficult to interpret due to a lack of outcome specificity. The studies reported here sought to develop procedures to isolate sensory-specific processes in aversive learning and behavior and to assess the possible contribution of the basal amygdala. Post-training changes to outcome value produced commensurate changes to subsequently tested conditioned responding in male rodents. Specifically, increases in shock intensity (i.e., inflation) augmented, while repeated exposure to (i.e., habituation of) an aversive sound (klaxon-horn) reduced freezing to conditioned stimuli previously paired with these outcomes. This was extended to a discriminative procedure, in which following revaluation of one event, but not the other, responding was found to be dependent on outcome value signaled by each cue. Chemogenetic inactivation of basal amygdala impaired this discrimination between stimuli signaling differently valued outcomes, but did not affect the revaluation process itself. These findings demonstrate a contribution of the basal amygdala to aversive outcome-dependent motivational processes.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The specific content of pavlovian associative learning has been well studied in appetitive motivation, where the value of different foods can be easily manipulated. This has facilitated our understanding of the neural circuits that generate different forms of motivation (i.e., sensory specific vs general). Studies of aversive learning have not produced the same degree of understanding with regard to sensory specificity due to a lack of tools for evaluating sensory-specific processes. Here we use a variant of outcome devaluation procedures with aversive stimuli to study the role of basal amygdala in discriminating between aversive stimuli conveying different degrees of threat. These findings have implications for how we study generalized threat to identify dysregulation that can contribute to generalized anxiety.

KW - aversive

KW - devaluation

KW - discrimination

KW - motivation

KW - salience

KW - value

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074119268&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074119268&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2530-18.2019

DO - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2530-18.2019

M3 - Article

C2 - 31492771

AN - SCOPUS:85074119268

VL - 39

SP - 8510

EP - 8516

JO - Journal of Neuroscience

JF - Journal of Neuroscience

SN - 0270-6474

IS - 43

ER -