Changing the intellectual climate

Noel Castree, William M. Adams, John Barry, Daniel Brockington, Bram Büscher, Esteve Corbera, David Demeritt, Rosaleen Duffy, Ulrike Felt, Katja Neves, Peter Newell, Luigi Pellizzoni, Kate Rigby, Paul Robbins, Libby Robin, Deborah Bird Rose, Andrew Ross, David Schlosberg, Sverker Sörlin, Paige West & 2 others Mark Whitehead, Brian Wynne

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    Abstract

    Calls for more broad-based, integrated, useful knowledge now abound in the world of global environmental change science. They evidence many scientists' desire to help humanity confront the momentous biophysical implications of its own actions. But they also reveal a limited conception of social science and virtually ignore the humanities. They thereby endorse a stunted conception of 'human dimensions' at a time when the challenges posed by global environmental change are increasing in magnitude, scale and scope. Here, we make the case for a richer conception predicated on broader intellectual engagement and identify some preconditions for its practical fulfilment. Interdisciplinary dialogue, we suggest, should engender plural representations of Earth's present and future that are reflective of divergent human values and aspirations. In turn, this might insure publics and decision-makers against overly narrow conceptions of what is possible and desirable as they consider the profound questions raised by global environmental change.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)763-768
    Number of pages6
    JournalNature Climate Change
    Volume4
    Issue number9
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Sep 11 2014

    Fingerprint

    environmental change
    climate
    decision maker
    social science
    dialogue
    present
    science
    evidence
    Values
    decision
    public

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
    • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

    Cite this

    Castree, N., Adams, W. M., Barry, J., Brockington, D., Büscher, B., Corbera, E., ... Wynne, B. (2014). Changing the intellectual climate. Nature Climate Change, 4(9), 763-768. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2339

    Changing the intellectual climate. / Castree, Noel; Adams, William M.; Barry, John; Brockington, Daniel; Büscher, Bram; Corbera, Esteve; Demeritt, David; Duffy, Rosaleen; Felt, Ulrike; Neves, Katja; Newell, Peter; Pellizzoni, Luigi; Rigby, Kate; Robbins, Paul; Robin, Libby; Rose, Deborah Bird; Ross, Andrew; Schlosberg, David; Sörlin, Sverker; West, Paige; Whitehead, Mark; Wynne, Brian.

    In: Nature Climate Change, Vol. 4, No. 9, 11.09.2014, p. 763-768.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    Castree, N, Adams, WM, Barry, J, Brockington, D, Büscher, B, Corbera, E, Demeritt, D, Duffy, R, Felt, U, Neves, K, Newell, P, Pellizzoni, L, Rigby, K, Robbins, P, Robin, L, Rose, DB, Ross, A, Schlosberg, D, Sörlin, S, West, P, Whitehead, M & Wynne, B 2014, 'Changing the intellectual climate', Nature Climate Change, vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 763-768. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2339
    Castree N, Adams WM, Barry J, Brockington D, Büscher B, Corbera E et al. Changing the intellectual climate. Nature Climate Change. 2014 Sep 11;4(9):763-768. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2339
    Castree, Noel ; Adams, William M. ; Barry, John ; Brockington, Daniel ; Büscher, Bram ; Corbera, Esteve ; Demeritt, David ; Duffy, Rosaleen ; Felt, Ulrike ; Neves, Katja ; Newell, Peter ; Pellizzoni, Luigi ; Rigby, Kate ; Robbins, Paul ; Robin, Libby ; Rose, Deborah Bird ; Ross, Andrew ; Schlosberg, David ; Sörlin, Sverker ; West, Paige ; Whitehead, Mark ; Wynne, Brian. / Changing the intellectual climate. In: Nature Climate Change. 2014 ; Vol. 4, No. 9. pp. 763-768.
    @article{1053feccb39642b19be89c581f7f340d,
    title = "Changing the intellectual climate",
    abstract = "Calls for more broad-based, integrated, useful knowledge now abound in the world of global environmental change science. They evidence many scientists' desire to help humanity confront the momentous biophysical implications of its own actions. But they also reveal a limited conception of social science and virtually ignore the humanities. They thereby endorse a stunted conception of 'human dimensions' at a time when the challenges posed by global environmental change are increasing in magnitude, scale and scope. Here, we make the case for a richer conception predicated on broader intellectual engagement and identify some preconditions for its practical fulfilment. Interdisciplinary dialogue, we suggest, should engender plural representations of Earth's present and future that are reflective of divergent human values and aspirations. In turn, this might insure publics and decision-makers against overly narrow conceptions of what is possible and desirable as they consider the profound questions raised by global environmental change.",
    author = "Noel Castree and Adams, {William M.} and John Barry and Daniel Brockington and Bram B{\"u}scher and Esteve Corbera and David Demeritt and Rosaleen Duffy and Ulrike Felt and Katja Neves and Peter Newell and Luigi Pellizzoni and Kate Rigby and Paul Robbins and Libby Robin and Rose, {Deborah Bird} and Andrew Ross and David Schlosberg and Sverker S{\"o}rlin and Paige West and Mark Whitehead and Brian Wynne",
    year = "2014",
    month = "9",
    day = "11",
    doi = "10.1038/nclimate2339",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "4",
    pages = "763--768",
    journal = "Nature Climate Change",
    issn = "1758-678X",
    publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
    number = "9",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Changing the intellectual climate

    AU - Castree, Noel

    AU - Adams, William M.

    AU - Barry, John

    AU - Brockington, Daniel

    AU - Büscher, Bram

    AU - Corbera, Esteve

    AU - Demeritt, David

    AU - Duffy, Rosaleen

    AU - Felt, Ulrike

    AU - Neves, Katja

    AU - Newell, Peter

    AU - Pellizzoni, Luigi

    AU - Rigby, Kate

    AU - Robbins, Paul

    AU - Robin, Libby

    AU - Rose, Deborah Bird

    AU - Ross, Andrew

    AU - Schlosberg, David

    AU - Sörlin, Sverker

    AU - West, Paige

    AU - Whitehead, Mark

    AU - Wynne, Brian

    PY - 2014/9/11

    Y1 - 2014/9/11

    N2 - Calls for more broad-based, integrated, useful knowledge now abound in the world of global environmental change science. They evidence many scientists' desire to help humanity confront the momentous biophysical implications of its own actions. But they also reveal a limited conception of social science and virtually ignore the humanities. They thereby endorse a stunted conception of 'human dimensions' at a time when the challenges posed by global environmental change are increasing in magnitude, scale and scope. Here, we make the case for a richer conception predicated on broader intellectual engagement and identify some preconditions for its practical fulfilment. Interdisciplinary dialogue, we suggest, should engender plural representations of Earth's present and future that are reflective of divergent human values and aspirations. In turn, this might insure publics and decision-makers against overly narrow conceptions of what is possible and desirable as they consider the profound questions raised by global environmental change.

    AB - Calls for more broad-based, integrated, useful knowledge now abound in the world of global environmental change science. They evidence many scientists' desire to help humanity confront the momentous biophysical implications of its own actions. But they also reveal a limited conception of social science and virtually ignore the humanities. They thereby endorse a stunted conception of 'human dimensions' at a time when the challenges posed by global environmental change are increasing in magnitude, scale and scope. Here, we make the case for a richer conception predicated on broader intellectual engagement and identify some preconditions for its practical fulfilment. Interdisciplinary dialogue, we suggest, should engender plural representations of Earth's present and future that are reflective of divergent human values and aspirations. In turn, this might insure publics and decision-makers against overly narrow conceptions of what is possible and desirable as they consider the profound questions raised by global environmental change.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906880131&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84906880131&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1038/nclimate2339

    DO - 10.1038/nclimate2339

    M3 - Review article

    VL - 4

    SP - 763

    EP - 768

    JO - Nature Climate Change

    JF - Nature Climate Change

    SN - 1758-678X

    IS - 9

    ER -