Changing Resident Physician Studying Behaviors: A Randomized, Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Goal Setting Versus Use of WOOP

Daniel Saddawi-Konefka, Keith Baker, Anthony Guarino, Sara M. Burns, Gabriele Oettingen, Peter Gollwitzer, Jonathan E. Charnin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND : Following through on one's goals to study is essential for effective, self-regulated learning. This can be difficult for residents because of clinical demands and limited personal time. WOOP (Wish, Outcome, Obstacle, Plan) is a self-regulation strategy, also known as mental contrasting with implementation intentions. WOOP increases follow-through on goals in many domains, although it has not, to our knowledge, been evaluated in medical education.

OBJECTIVE : We compared the effect of WOOP versus goal setting on time residents spent studying.

METHODS : Through a prospective, randomized, comparative effectiveness study, during a 1-month, intensive care unit rotation, we clustered anesthesiology residents in single-blind fashion to WOOP versus goal setting. Both groups received organized study materials. The intervention group performed WOOP to study more; the comparison group set goals to study more. Residents tracked studying with daily diaries. The primary outcome was total time spent studying toward stated goals. Time spent studying "non-goal" medical material was a secondary outcome.

RESULTS : Of 34 eligible residents, 100% participated. Sixteen residents were randomized to the WOOP group and 18 to the goal-setting group. The WOOP group spent significantly more time studying toward their goals compared with the goal-setting group (median = 4.3 hours versus 1.5 hours; P = .021; g = 0.66). There was no significant difference in time spent studying non-goal medical material between groups (median = 5.5 hours versus 5.0 hours, P = .99).

CONCLUSIONS : WOOP increased the time residents spent studying toward their goals as compared with setting goals alone.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)451-457
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of graduate medical education
Volume9
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2017

Fingerprint

Physicians
Anesthesiology
Medical Education
Intensive Care Units
Learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Changing Resident Physician Studying Behaviors : A Randomized, Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Goal Setting Versus Use of WOOP. / Saddawi-Konefka, Daniel; Baker, Keith; Guarino, Anthony; Burns, Sara M.; Oettingen, Gabriele; Gollwitzer, Peter; Charnin, Jonathan E.

In: Journal of graduate medical education, Vol. 9, No. 4, 01.08.2017, p. 451-457.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Saddawi-Konefka, Daniel ; Baker, Keith ; Guarino, Anthony ; Burns, Sara M. ; Oettingen, Gabriele ; Gollwitzer, Peter ; Charnin, Jonathan E. / Changing Resident Physician Studying Behaviors : A Randomized, Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Goal Setting Versus Use of WOOP. In: Journal of graduate medical education. 2017 ; Vol. 9, No. 4. pp. 451-457.
@article{58b0dde5dded48129cf8bed4e00bfdcc,
title = "Changing Resident Physician Studying Behaviors: A Randomized, Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Goal Setting Versus Use of WOOP",
abstract = "BACKGROUND : Following through on one's goals to study is essential for effective, self-regulated learning. This can be difficult for residents because of clinical demands and limited personal time. WOOP (Wish, Outcome, Obstacle, Plan) is a self-regulation strategy, also known as mental contrasting with implementation intentions. WOOP increases follow-through on goals in many domains, although it has not, to our knowledge, been evaluated in medical education.OBJECTIVE : We compared the effect of WOOP versus goal setting on time residents spent studying.METHODS : Through a prospective, randomized, comparative effectiveness study, during a 1-month, intensive care unit rotation, we clustered anesthesiology residents in single-blind fashion to WOOP versus goal setting. Both groups received organized study materials. The intervention group performed WOOP to study more; the comparison group set goals to study more. Residents tracked studying with daily diaries. The primary outcome was total time spent studying toward stated goals. Time spent studying {"}non-goal{"} medical material was a secondary outcome.RESULTS : Of 34 eligible residents, 100{\%} participated. Sixteen residents were randomized to the WOOP group and 18 to the goal-setting group. The WOOP group spent significantly more time studying toward their goals compared with the goal-setting group (median = 4.3 hours versus 1.5 hours; P = .021; g = 0.66). There was no significant difference in time spent studying non-goal medical material between groups (median = 5.5 hours versus 5.0 hours, P = .99).CONCLUSIONS : WOOP increased the time residents spent studying toward their goals as compared with setting goals alone.",
author = "Daniel Saddawi-Konefka and Keith Baker and Anthony Guarino and Burns, {Sara M.} and Gabriele Oettingen and Peter Gollwitzer and Charnin, {Jonathan E.}",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4300/JGME-D-16-00703.1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "451--457",
journal = "Journal of graduate medical education",
issn = "1949-8349",
publisher = "University of Finance and Management",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Changing Resident Physician Studying Behaviors

T2 - A Randomized, Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Goal Setting Versus Use of WOOP

AU - Saddawi-Konefka, Daniel

AU - Baker, Keith

AU - Guarino, Anthony

AU - Burns, Sara M.

AU - Oettingen, Gabriele

AU - Gollwitzer, Peter

AU - Charnin, Jonathan E.

PY - 2017/8/1

Y1 - 2017/8/1

N2 - BACKGROUND : Following through on one's goals to study is essential for effective, self-regulated learning. This can be difficult for residents because of clinical demands and limited personal time. WOOP (Wish, Outcome, Obstacle, Plan) is a self-regulation strategy, also known as mental contrasting with implementation intentions. WOOP increases follow-through on goals in many domains, although it has not, to our knowledge, been evaluated in medical education.OBJECTIVE : We compared the effect of WOOP versus goal setting on time residents spent studying.METHODS : Through a prospective, randomized, comparative effectiveness study, during a 1-month, intensive care unit rotation, we clustered anesthesiology residents in single-blind fashion to WOOP versus goal setting. Both groups received organized study materials. The intervention group performed WOOP to study more; the comparison group set goals to study more. Residents tracked studying with daily diaries. The primary outcome was total time spent studying toward stated goals. Time spent studying "non-goal" medical material was a secondary outcome.RESULTS : Of 34 eligible residents, 100% participated. Sixteen residents were randomized to the WOOP group and 18 to the goal-setting group. The WOOP group spent significantly more time studying toward their goals compared with the goal-setting group (median = 4.3 hours versus 1.5 hours; P = .021; g = 0.66). There was no significant difference in time spent studying non-goal medical material between groups (median = 5.5 hours versus 5.0 hours, P = .99).CONCLUSIONS : WOOP increased the time residents spent studying toward their goals as compared with setting goals alone.

AB - BACKGROUND : Following through on one's goals to study is essential for effective, self-regulated learning. This can be difficult for residents because of clinical demands and limited personal time. WOOP (Wish, Outcome, Obstacle, Plan) is a self-regulation strategy, also known as mental contrasting with implementation intentions. WOOP increases follow-through on goals in many domains, although it has not, to our knowledge, been evaluated in medical education.OBJECTIVE : We compared the effect of WOOP versus goal setting on time residents spent studying.METHODS : Through a prospective, randomized, comparative effectiveness study, during a 1-month, intensive care unit rotation, we clustered anesthesiology residents in single-blind fashion to WOOP versus goal setting. Both groups received organized study materials. The intervention group performed WOOP to study more; the comparison group set goals to study more. Residents tracked studying with daily diaries. The primary outcome was total time spent studying toward stated goals. Time spent studying "non-goal" medical material was a secondary outcome.RESULTS : Of 34 eligible residents, 100% participated. Sixteen residents were randomized to the WOOP group and 18 to the goal-setting group. The WOOP group spent significantly more time studying toward their goals compared with the goal-setting group (median = 4.3 hours versus 1.5 hours; P = .021; g = 0.66). There was no significant difference in time spent studying non-goal medical material between groups (median = 5.5 hours versus 5.0 hours, P = .99).CONCLUSIONS : WOOP increased the time residents spent studying toward their goals as compared with setting goals alone.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048525484&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048525484&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4300/JGME-D-16-00703.1

DO - 10.4300/JGME-D-16-00703.1

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 451

EP - 457

JO - Journal of graduate medical education

JF - Journal of graduate medical education

SN - 1949-8349

IS - 4

ER -