Changes of mind in decision-making

Arbora Resulaj, Roozbeh Kiani, Daniel M. Wolpert, Michael N. Shadlen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A decision is a commitment to a proposition or plan of action based on evidence and the expected costs and benefits associated with the outcome. Progress in a variety of fields has led to a quantitative understanding of the mechanisms that evaluate evidence and reach a decision. Several formalisms propose that a representation of noisy evidence is evaluated against a criterion to produce a decision. Without additional evidence, however, these formalisms fail to explain why a decision-maker would change their mind. Here we extend a model, developed to account for both the timing and the accuracy of the initial decision, to explain subsequent changes of mind. Subjects made decisions about a noisy visual stimulus, which they indicated by moving a handle. Although they received no additional information after initiating their movement, their hand trajectories betrayed a change of mind in some trials. We propose that noisy evidence is accumulated over time until it reaches a criterion level, or bound, which determines the initial decision, and that the brain exploits information that is in the processing pipeline when the initial decision is made to subsequently either reverse or reaffirm the initial decision. The model explains both the frequency of changes of mind as well as their dependence on both task difficulty and whether the initial decision was accurate or erroneous. The theoretical and experimental findings advance the understanding of decision-making to the highly flexible and cognitive acts of vacillation and self-correction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)263-266
Number of pages4
JournalNature
Volume461
Issue number7261
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 10 2009

Fingerprint

Cost-Benefit Analysis
Decision Making
Hand
Brain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Cite this

Resulaj, A., Kiani, R., Wolpert, D. M., & Shadlen, M. N. (2009). Changes of mind in decision-making. Nature, 461(7261), 263-266. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08275

Changes of mind in decision-making. / Resulaj, Arbora; Kiani, Roozbeh; Wolpert, Daniel M.; Shadlen, Michael N.

In: Nature, Vol. 461, No. 7261, 10.09.2009, p. 263-266.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Resulaj, A, Kiani, R, Wolpert, DM & Shadlen, MN 2009, 'Changes of mind in decision-making', Nature, vol. 461, no. 7261, pp. 263-266. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08275
Resulaj A, Kiani R, Wolpert DM, Shadlen MN. Changes of mind in decision-making. Nature. 2009 Sep 10;461(7261):263-266. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08275
Resulaj, Arbora ; Kiani, Roozbeh ; Wolpert, Daniel M. ; Shadlen, Michael N. / Changes of mind in decision-making. In: Nature. 2009 ; Vol. 461, No. 7261. pp. 263-266.
@article{9836c5c0d1ce4f81b190f2ce780227b5,
title = "Changes of mind in decision-making",
abstract = "A decision is a commitment to a proposition or plan of action based on evidence and the expected costs and benefits associated with the outcome. Progress in a variety of fields has led to a quantitative understanding of the mechanisms that evaluate evidence and reach a decision. Several formalisms propose that a representation of noisy evidence is evaluated against a criterion to produce a decision. Without additional evidence, however, these formalisms fail to explain why a decision-maker would change their mind. Here we extend a model, developed to account for both the timing and the accuracy of the initial decision, to explain subsequent changes of mind. Subjects made decisions about a noisy visual stimulus, which they indicated by moving a handle. Although they received no additional information after initiating their movement, their hand trajectories betrayed a change of mind in some trials. We propose that noisy evidence is accumulated over time until it reaches a criterion level, or bound, which determines the initial decision, and that the brain exploits information that is in the processing pipeline when the initial decision is made to subsequently either reverse or reaffirm the initial decision. The model explains both the frequency of changes of mind as well as their dependence on both task difficulty and whether the initial decision was accurate or erroneous. The theoretical and experimental findings advance the understanding of decision-making to the highly flexible and cognitive acts of vacillation and self-correction.",
author = "Arbora Resulaj and Roozbeh Kiani and Wolpert, {Daniel M.} and Shadlen, {Michael N.}",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1038/nature08275",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "461",
pages = "263--266",
journal = "Nature Cell Biology",
issn = "1465-7392",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "7261",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Changes of mind in decision-making

AU - Resulaj, Arbora

AU - Kiani, Roozbeh

AU - Wolpert, Daniel M.

AU - Shadlen, Michael N.

PY - 2009/9/10

Y1 - 2009/9/10

N2 - A decision is a commitment to a proposition or plan of action based on evidence and the expected costs and benefits associated with the outcome. Progress in a variety of fields has led to a quantitative understanding of the mechanisms that evaluate evidence and reach a decision. Several formalisms propose that a representation of noisy evidence is evaluated against a criterion to produce a decision. Without additional evidence, however, these formalisms fail to explain why a decision-maker would change their mind. Here we extend a model, developed to account for both the timing and the accuracy of the initial decision, to explain subsequent changes of mind. Subjects made decisions about a noisy visual stimulus, which they indicated by moving a handle. Although they received no additional information after initiating their movement, their hand trajectories betrayed a change of mind in some trials. We propose that noisy evidence is accumulated over time until it reaches a criterion level, or bound, which determines the initial decision, and that the brain exploits information that is in the processing pipeline when the initial decision is made to subsequently either reverse or reaffirm the initial decision. The model explains both the frequency of changes of mind as well as their dependence on both task difficulty and whether the initial decision was accurate or erroneous. The theoretical and experimental findings advance the understanding of decision-making to the highly flexible and cognitive acts of vacillation and self-correction.

AB - A decision is a commitment to a proposition or plan of action based on evidence and the expected costs and benefits associated with the outcome. Progress in a variety of fields has led to a quantitative understanding of the mechanisms that evaluate evidence and reach a decision. Several formalisms propose that a representation of noisy evidence is evaluated against a criterion to produce a decision. Without additional evidence, however, these formalisms fail to explain why a decision-maker would change their mind. Here we extend a model, developed to account for both the timing and the accuracy of the initial decision, to explain subsequent changes of mind. Subjects made decisions about a noisy visual stimulus, which they indicated by moving a handle. Although they received no additional information after initiating their movement, their hand trajectories betrayed a change of mind in some trials. We propose that noisy evidence is accumulated over time until it reaches a criterion level, or bound, which determines the initial decision, and that the brain exploits information that is in the processing pipeline when the initial decision is made to subsequently either reverse or reaffirm the initial decision. The model explains both the frequency of changes of mind as well as their dependence on both task difficulty and whether the initial decision was accurate or erroneous. The theoretical and experimental findings advance the understanding of decision-making to the highly flexible and cognitive acts of vacillation and self-correction.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70249092109&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70249092109&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/nature08275

DO - 10.1038/nature08275

M3 - Article

VL - 461

SP - 263

EP - 266

JO - Nature Cell Biology

JF - Nature Cell Biology

SN - 1465-7392

IS - 7261

ER -