Centrifuge research of countermeasures to protect pile foundations against liquefaction-induced lateral spreading

Tarek Abdoun, Ricardo Dobry, Thomas F. Zimmie, Mourad Zeghal

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Repeated experience of foundation and superstructural damage during earthquakes associated with ground failure and liquefaction, have shown the importance of lateral spreading and especially of the presence of a shallow nonliquefiable soil layer as a cause of damage. Typically such strong nonliquefiable layer or crust, riding on the liquefiable soil where the lateral spread actually occurs, pushes laterally against the piles and pile cap, inducing large lateral forces, deformations and bending in the foundation. The effects depend on the free field deformation, characteristics of the nonliquefiable layer and foundation, and characteristics of the superstructure. For an existing pile foundation, the first step is to verify if the pile foundation has enough stiffness and strength to resist the soil lateral forces, and especially the passive thrust applied by the nonliquefiable layer, with acceptable foundation displacement and rotation and no damage to the foundation elements, in which case no countermeasures are needed. If this evaluation concludes that the foundation does not possess the required stiffness and strength to prevent distress, three mitigation strategies are often used: (i) Remediation countermear sure of the liquefiable soil at the site to prevent the free field liquefaction and lateral spreading from occurring in the first place; (ii) retrofitting of the foundation by reinforcing it, for example by adding piles or strengthening the existing piles; and (iii) isolation of the foundation, and especially of the pile cap, from the nonliquefiable layer in the free field by a retrofitting countermeasure where a “soft fuse” such as a soft soil or other material or device are installed at shallow depths near the foundation, hence limiting the lateral force applied to the piles and pile cap to a low value which minimises the deformation and bending of the foundation. The paper discusses these countermeasure strategies through several series of centrifuge model tests of single piles and pile groups conducted with the participation of the authors at the RPI geotechnical centrifuge.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)105-125
    Number of pages21
    JournalJournal of Earthquake Engineering
    Volume9
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 2005

    Fingerprint

    Pile foundations
    Centrifuges
    Liquefaction
    centrifuge
    liquefaction
    Piles
    pile
    Soils
    Retrofitting
    stiffness
    Stiffness
    earthquake damage
    damage
    pile group
    soil
    shallow soil
    soft soil
    Electric fuses
    Remediation
    model test

    Keywords

    • Centrifuge
    • Lateral spreading
    • Liquefaction-induced
    • Pile foundations

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Civil and Structural Engineering
    • Building and Construction
    • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

    Cite this

    Centrifuge research of countermeasures to protect pile foundations against liquefaction-induced lateral spreading. / Abdoun, Tarek; Dobry, Ricardo; Zimmie, Thomas F.; Zeghal, Mourad.

    In: Journal of Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 9, 01.01.2005, p. 105-125.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abdoun, Tarek ; Dobry, Ricardo ; Zimmie, Thomas F. ; Zeghal, Mourad. / Centrifuge research of countermeasures to protect pile foundations against liquefaction-induced lateral spreading. In: Journal of Earthquake Engineering. 2005 ; Vol. 9. pp. 105-125.
    @article{b58d68f3173c46c2b4e6e46bb3a3ed24,
    title = "Centrifuge research of countermeasures to protect pile foundations against liquefaction-induced lateral spreading",
    abstract = "Repeated experience of foundation and superstructural damage during earthquakes associated with ground failure and liquefaction, have shown the importance of lateral spreading and especially of the presence of a shallow nonliquefiable soil layer as a cause of damage. Typically such strong nonliquefiable layer or crust, riding on the liquefiable soil where the lateral spread actually occurs, pushes laterally against the piles and pile cap, inducing large lateral forces, deformations and bending in the foundation. The effects depend on the free field deformation, characteristics of the nonliquefiable layer and foundation, and characteristics of the superstructure. For an existing pile foundation, the first step is to verify if the pile foundation has enough stiffness and strength to resist the soil lateral forces, and especially the passive thrust applied by the nonliquefiable layer, with acceptable foundation displacement and rotation and no damage to the foundation elements, in which case no countermeasures are needed. If this evaluation concludes that the foundation does not possess the required stiffness and strength to prevent distress, three mitigation strategies are often used: (i) Remediation countermear sure of the liquefiable soil at the site to prevent the free field liquefaction and lateral spreading from occurring in the first place; (ii) retrofitting of the foundation by reinforcing it, for example by adding piles or strengthening the existing piles; and (iii) isolation of the foundation, and especially of the pile cap, from the nonliquefiable layer in the free field by a retrofitting countermeasure where a “soft fuse” such as a soft soil or other material or device are installed at shallow depths near the foundation, hence limiting the lateral force applied to the piles and pile cap to a low value which minimises the deformation and bending of the foundation. The paper discusses these countermeasure strategies through several series of centrifuge model tests of single piles and pile groups conducted with the participation of the authors at the RPI geotechnical centrifuge.",
    keywords = "Centrifuge, Lateral spreading, Liquefaction-induced, Pile foundations",
    author = "Tarek Abdoun and Ricardo Dobry and Zimmie, {Thomas F.} and Mourad Zeghal",
    year = "2005",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1080/13632460509350581",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "9",
    pages = "105--125",
    journal = "Journal of Earthquake Engineering",
    issn = "1363-2469",
    publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Centrifuge research of countermeasures to protect pile foundations against liquefaction-induced lateral spreading

    AU - Abdoun, Tarek

    AU - Dobry, Ricardo

    AU - Zimmie, Thomas F.

    AU - Zeghal, Mourad

    PY - 2005/1/1

    Y1 - 2005/1/1

    N2 - Repeated experience of foundation and superstructural damage during earthquakes associated with ground failure and liquefaction, have shown the importance of lateral spreading and especially of the presence of a shallow nonliquefiable soil layer as a cause of damage. Typically such strong nonliquefiable layer or crust, riding on the liquefiable soil where the lateral spread actually occurs, pushes laterally against the piles and pile cap, inducing large lateral forces, deformations and bending in the foundation. The effects depend on the free field deformation, characteristics of the nonliquefiable layer and foundation, and characteristics of the superstructure. For an existing pile foundation, the first step is to verify if the pile foundation has enough stiffness and strength to resist the soil lateral forces, and especially the passive thrust applied by the nonliquefiable layer, with acceptable foundation displacement and rotation and no damage to the foundation elements, in which case no countermeasures are needed. If this evaluation concludes that the foundation does not possess the required stiffness and strength to prevent distress, three mitigation strategies are often used: (i) Remediation countermear sure of the liquefiable soil at the site to prevent the free field liquefaction and lateral spreading from occurring in the first place; (ii) retrofitting of the foundation by reinforcing it, for example by adding piles or strengthening the existing piles; and (iii) isolation of the foundation, and especially of the pile cap, from the nonliquefiable layer in the free field by a retrofitting countermeasure where a “soft fuse” such as a soft soil or other material or device are installed at shallow depths near the foundation, hence limiting the lateral force applied to the piles and pile cap to a low value which minimises the deformation and bending of the foundation. The paper discusses these countermeasure strategies through several series of centrifuge model tests of single piles and pile groups conducted with the participation of the authors at the RPI geotechnical centrifuge.

    AB - Repeated experience of foundation and superstructural damage during earthquakes associated with ground failure and liquefaction, have shown the importance of lateral spreading and especially of the presence of a shallow nonliquefiable soil layer as a cause of damage. Typically such strong nonliquefiable layer or crust, riding on the liquefiable soil where the lateral spread actually occurs, pushes laterally against the piles and pile cap, inducing large lateral forces, deformations and bending in the foundation. The effects depend on the free field deformation, characteristics of the nonliquefiable layer and foundation, and characteristics of the superstructure. For an existing pile foundation, the first step is to verify if the pile foundation has enough stiffness and strength to resist the soil lateral forces, and especially the passive thrust applied by the nonliquefiable layer, with acceptable foundation displacement and rotation and no damage to the foundation elements, in which case no countermeasures are needed. If this evaluation concludes that the foundation does not possess the required stiffness and strength to prevent distress, three mitigation strategies are often used: (i) Remediation countermear sure of the liquefiable soil at the site to prevent the free field liquefaction and lateral spreading from occurring in the first place; (ii) retrofitting of the foundation by reinforcing it, for example by adding piles or strengthening the existing piles; and (iii) isolation of the foundation, and especially of the pile cap, from the nonliquefiable layer in the free field by a retrofitting countermeasure where a “soft fuse” such as a soft soil or other material or device are installed at shallow depths near the foundation, hence limiting the lateral force applied to the piles and pile cap to a low value which minimises the deformation and bending of the foundation. The paper discusses these countermeasure strategies through several series of centrifuge model tests of single piles and pile groups conducted with the participation of the authors at the RPI geotechnical centrifuge.

    KW - Centrifuge

    KW - Lateral spreading

    KW - Liquefaction-induced

    KW - Pile foundations

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=23944484491&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=23944484491&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1080/13632460509350581

    DO - 10.1080/13632460509350581

    M3 - Article

    VL - 9

    SP - 105

    EP - 125

    JO - Journal of Earthquake Engineering

    JF - Journal of Earthquake Engineering

    SN - 1363-2469

    ER -