Cell distribution of stress fibres in response to the geometry of the adhesive environment

Manuel Théry, Anne Pépin, Emilie Dressaire, Yong Chen, Michel Bornens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Cells display a large variety of shapes when plated in classical culture conditions despite their belonging to a common cell type. These shapes are transitory, since cells permanently disassemble and reassemble their cytoskeleton while moving. Adhesive micropatterns are commonly used to confine cell shape within a given geometry. In addition the micropattern can be designed so as to impose cells to spread upon adhesive and nonadhesive areas. Modulation of the pattern geometry allows the analysis of the mechanisms governing the determination of cell shape in response to external adhesive conditions. In this study, we show that the acquisition of cell shape follows two stages where initially the cell forms contact with the micropattern. Here, the most distal contacts made by the cell with the micropattern define the apices of the cell shape. Then secondly, the cell borders that link two apices move so as to minimise the distance between the two apices. In these cell borders, the absence of an underlying adhesive substrate is overcome by stress fibres forming between the apices, which in turn are marked by an accumulation of focal adhesions. By inhibiting myosin function, cell borders on nonadhesive zones become more concave, suggesting that the stress fibres work against the membrane tension in the cell border. Moreover, this suggested that traction forces are unevenly distributed in stationary, nonmigrating, cells. By comparing the stress fibres in cells with one, two, or three nonadherent cell borders it was reasoned that stress fibre strength is inversely proportional to number. We conclude that cells of a given area can generate the same total sum of tractional forces but that these tractional forces are differently spaced depending on the spatial distribution of its adherence contacts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)341-355
Number of pages15
JournalCell Motility and the Cytoskeleton
Volume63
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2006

Fingerprint

Stress Fibers
Adhesives
Cell Shape
Focal Adhesions
Traction
Myosins
Cytoskeleton

Keywords

  • Actin
  • Micro-pattern
  • Stress fibres
  • Tension

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cell Biology

Cite this

Cell distribution of stress fibres in response to the geometry of the adhesive environment. / Théry, Manuel; Pépin, Anne; Dressaire, Emilie; Chen, Yong; Bornens, Michel.

In: Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton, Vol. 63, No. 6, 06.2006, p. 341-355.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Théry, Manuel ; Pépin, Anne ; Dressaire, Emilie ; Chen, Yong ; Bornens, Michel. / Cell distribution of stress fibres in response to the geometry of the adhesive environment. In: Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton. 2006 ; Vol. 63, No. 6. pp. 341-355.
@article{a5cf13939ada4f01a06345881a8666df,
title = "Cell distribution of stress fibres in response to the geometry of the adhesive environment",
abstract = "Cells display a large variety of shapes when plated in classical culture conditions despite their belonging to a common cell type. These shapes are transitory, since cells permanently disassemble and reassemble their cytoskeleton while moving. Adhesive micropatterns are commonly used to confine cell shape within a given geometry. In addition the micropattern can be designed so as to impose cells to spread upon adhesive and nonadhesive areas. Modulation of the pattern geometry allows the analysis of the mechanisms governing the determination of cell shape in response to external adhesive conditions. In this study, we show that the acquisition of cell shape follows two stages where initially the cell forms contact with the micropattern. Here, the most distal contacts made by the cell with the micropattern define the apices of the cell shape. Then secondly, the cell borders that link two apices move so as to minimise the distance between the two apices. In these cell borders, the absence of an underlying adhesive substrate is overcome by stress fibres forming between the apices, which in turn are marked by an accumulation of focal adhesions. By inhibiting myosin function, cell borders on nonadhesive zones become more concave, suggesting that the stress fibres work against the membrane tension in the cell border. Moreover, this suggested that traction forces are unevenly distributed in stationary, nonmigrating, cells. By comparing the stress fibres in cells with one, two, or three nonadherent cell borders it was reasoned that stress fibre strength is inversely proportional to number. We conclude that cells of a given area can generate the same total sum of tractional forces but that these tractional forces are differently spaced depending on the spatial distribution of its adherence contacts.",
keywords = "Actin, Micro-pattern, Stress fibres, Tension",
author = "Manuel Th{\'e}ry and Anne P{\'e}pin and Emilie Dressaire and Yong Chen and Michel Bornens",
year = "2006",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1002/cm.20126",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "63",
pages = "341--355",
journal = "Cytoskeleton",
issn = "1949-3584",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cell distribution of stress fibres in response to the geometry of the adhesive environment

AU - Théry, Manuel

AU - Pépin, Anne

AU - Dressaire, Emilie

AU - Chen, Yong

AU - Bornens, Michel

PY - 2006/6

Y1 - 2006/6

N2 - Cells display a large variety of shapes when plated in classical culture conditions despite their belonging to a common cell type. These shapes are transitory, since cells permanently disassemble and reassemble their cytoskeleton while moving. Adhesive micropatterns are commonly used to confine cell shape within a given geometry. In addition the micropattern can be designed so as to impose cells to spread upon adhesive and nonadhesive areas. Modulation of the pattern geometry allows the analysis of the mechanisms governing the determination of cell shape in response to external adhesive conditions. In this study, we show that the acquisition of cell shape follows two stages where initially the cell forms contact with the micropattern. Here, the most distal contacts made by the cell with the micropattern define the apices of the cell shape. Then secondly, the cell borders that link two apices move so as to minimise the distance between the two apices. In these cell borders, the absence of an underlying adhesive substrate is overcome by stress fibres forming between the apices, which in turn are marked by an accumulation of focal adhesions. By inhibiting myosin function, cell borders on nonadhesive zones become more concave, suggesting that the stress fibres work against the membrane tension in the cell border. Moreover, this suggested that traction forces are unevenly distributed in stationary, nonmigrating, cells. By comparing the stress fibres in cells with one, two, or three nonadherent cell borders it was reasoned that stress fibre strength is inversely proportional to number. We conclude that cells of a given area can generate the same total sum of tractional forces but that these tractional forces are differently spaced depending on the spatial distribution of its adherence contacts.

AB - Cells display a large variety of shapes when plated in classical culture conditions despite their belonging to a common cell type. These shapes are transitory, since cells permanently disassemble and reassemble their cytoskeleton while moving. Adhesive micropatterns are commonly used to confine cell shape within a given geometry. In addition the micropattern can be designed so as to impose cells to spread upon adhesive and nonadhesive areas. Modulation of the pattern geometry allows the analysis of the mechanisms governing the determination of cell shape in response to external adhesive conditions. In this study, we show that the acquisition of cell shape follows two stages where initially the cell forms contact with the micropattern. Here, the most distal contacts made by the cell with the micropattern define the apices of the cell shape. Then secondly, the cell borders that link two apices move so as to minimise the distance between the two apices. In these cell borders, the absence of an underlying adhesive substrate is overcome by stress fibres forming between the apices, which in turn are marked by an accumulation of focal adhesions. By inhibiting myosin function, cell borders on nonadhesive zones become more concave, suggesting that the stress fibres work against the membrane tension in the cell border. Moreover, this suggested that traction forces are unevenly distributed in stationary, nonmigrating, cells. By comparing the stress fibres in cells with one, two, or three nonadherent cell borders it was reasoned that stress fibre strength is inversely proportional to number. We conclude that cells of a given area can generate the same total sum of tractional forces but that these tractional forces are differently spaced depending on the spatial distribution of its adherence contacts.

KW - Actin

KW - Micro-pattern

KW - Stress fibres

KW - Tension

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646861953&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646861953&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/cm.20126

DO - 10.1002/cm.20126

M3 - Article

C2 - 16550544

AN - SCOPUS:33646861953

VL - 63

SP - 341

EP - 355

JO - Cytoskeleton

JF - Cytoskeleton

SN - 1949-3584

IS - 6

ER -