Causal knowledge and categories: The effects of causal beliefs on categorization, induction, and similarity

Robert Rehder, Reid Hastie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Despite the recent interest in the theoretical knowledge embedded in human representations of categories, little research has systematically manipulated the structure of such knowledge. Across four experiments this study assessed the effects of interattribute causal laws on a number of category-based judgments. The authors found that (a) any attribute occupying a central position in a network of causal relationships comes to dominate category membership, (b) combinations of attribute values are important to category membership to the extent they jointly confirm or violate the causal laws, and (c) the presence of causal knowledge affects the induction of new properties to the category. These effects were a result of the causal laws, rather than the empirical correlations produced by those laws. Implications for the doctrine of psychological essentialism, similarity-based models of categorization, and the representation of causal knowledge are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)323-360
Number of pages38
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: General
Volume130
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001

Fingerprint

Psychology
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychology(all)
  • Developmental Neuroscience

Cite this

Causal knowledge and categories : The effects of causal beliefs on categorization, induction, and similarity. / Rehder, Robert; Hastie, Reid.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Vol. 130, No. 3, 01.01.2001, p. 323-360.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9d2439bdaabd4a7d8329fd32ce240b15,
title = "Causal knowledge and categories: The effects of causal beliefs on categorization, induction, and similarity",
abstract = "Despite the recent interest in the theoretical knowledge embedded in human representations of categories, little research has systematically manipulated the structure of such knowledge. Across four experiments this study assessed the effects of interattribute causal laws on a number of category-based judgments. The authors found that (a) any attribute occupying a central position in a network of causal relationships comes to dominate category membership, (b) combinations of attribute values are important to category membership to the extent they jointly confirm or violate the causal laws, and (c) the presence of causal knowledge affects the induction of new properties to the category. These effects were a result of the causal laws, rather than the empirical correlations produced by those laws. Implications for the doctrine of psychological essentialism, similarity-based models of categorization, and the representation of causal knowledge are discussed.",
author = "Robert Rehder and Reid Hastie",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.323",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "130",
pages = "323--360",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: General",
issn = "0096-3445",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Causal knowledge and categories

T2 - The effects of causal beliefs on categorization, induction, and similarity

AU - Rehder, Robert

AU - Hastie, Reid

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - Despite the recent interest in the theoretical knowledge embedded in human representations of categories, little research has systematically manipulated the structure of such knowledge. Across four experiments this study assessed the effects of interattribute causal laws on a number of category-based judgments. The authors found that (a) any attribute occupying a central position in a network of causal relationships comes to dominate category membership, (b) combinations of attribute values are important to category membership to the extent they jointly confirm or violate the causal laws, and (c) the presence of causal knowledge affects the induction of new properties to the category. These effects were a result of the causal laws, rather than the empirical correlations produced by those laws. Implications for the doctrine of psychological essentialism, similarity-based models of categorization, and the representation of causal knowledge are discussed.

AB - Despite the recent interest in the theoretical knowledge embedded in human representations of categories, little research has systematically manipulated the structure of such knowledge. Across four experiments this study assessed the effects of interattribute causal laws on a number of category-based judgments. The authors found that (a) any attribute occupying a central position in a network of causal relationships comes to dominate category membership, (b) combinations of attribute values are important to category membership to the extent they jointly confirm or violate the causal laws, and (c) the presence of causal knowledge affects the induction of new properties to the category. These effects were a result of the causal laws, rather than the empirical correlations produced by those laws. Implications for the doctrine of psychological essentialism, similarity-based models of categorization, and the representation of causal knowledge are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047685694&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047685694&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.323

DO - 10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.323

M3 - Article

VL - 130

SP - 323

EP - 360

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

SN - 0096-3445

IS - 3

ER -