Causal empiricism in quantitative research

Cyrus Samii

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    Abstract

    Quantitative analysis of causal effects in political science has trended toward the adoption of "causal empiricist" approaches. Such approaches place heavy emphasis on causal identification through experimental and natural experimental designs and on characterizing the specific subpopulations for which effects are identified. This trend is eroding the position of traditional regression studies as the prevailing convention for quantitative causal research in political science. This essay clarifies what is at stake. I provide a causal empiricist critique of conventional regression studies, a statement of core pillars of causal empiricism, and a discussion of how causal empiricism and theory interact. I propose that the trend toward causal empiricism should be welcomed by a broad array of political scientists. The trend fits into a broader push to reimagine our discipline in terms of collective research programs with high standards for evidence and a research division of labor.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)941-955
    Number of pages15
    JournalJournal of Politics
    Volume78
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jul 1 2016

    Fingerprint

    empiricism
    quantitative research
    political science
    trend
    collective research
    regression
    political scientist
    division of labor
    evidence

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    Causal empiricism in quantitative research. / Samii, Cyrus.

    In: Journal of Politics, Vol. 78, No. 3, 01.07.2016, p. 941-955.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    Samii, Cyrus. / Causal empiricism in quantitative research. In: Journal of Politics. 2016 ; Vol. 78, No. 3. pp. 941-955.
    @article{6c25bb5b91f4400f8b118651186b3c21,
    title = "Causal empiricism in quantitative research",
    abstract = "Quantitative analysis of causal effects in political science has trended toward the adoption of {"}causal empiricist{"} approaches. Such approaches place heavy emphasis on causal identification through experimental and natural experimental designs and on characterizing the specific subpopulations for which effects are identified. This trend is eroding the position of traditional regression studies as the prevailing convention for quantitative causal research in political science. This essay clarifies what is at stake. I provide a causal empiricist critique of conventional regression studies, a statement of core pillars of causal empiricism, and a discussion of how causal empiricism and theory interact. I propose that the trend toward causal empiricism should be welcomed by a broad array of political scientists. The trend fits into a broader push to reimagine our discipline in terms of collective research programs with high standards for evidence and a research division of labor.",
    author = "Cyrus Samii",
    year = "2016",
    month = "7",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1086/686690",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "78",
    pages = "941--955",
    journal = "Journal of Politics",
    issn = "0022-3816",
    publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Causal empiricism in quantitative research

    AU - Samii, Cyrus

    PY - 2016/7/1

    Y1 - 2016/7/1

    N2 - Quantitative analysis of causal effects in political science has trended toward the adoption of "causal empiricist" approaches. Such approaches place heavy emphasis on causal identification through experimental and natural experimental designs and on characterizing the specific subpopulations for which effects are identified. This trend is eroding the position of traditional regression studies as the prevailing convention for quantitative causal research in political science. This essay clarifies what is at stake. I provide a causal empiricist critique of conventional regression studies, a statement of core pillars of causal empiricism, and a discussion of how causal empiricism and theory interact. I propose that the trend toward causal empiricism should be welcomed by a broad array of political scientists. The trend fits into a broader push to reimagine our discipline in terms of collective research programs with high standards for evidence and a research division of labor.

    AB - Quantitative analysis of causal effects in political science has trended toward the adoption of "causal empiricist" approaches. Such approaches place heavy emphasis on causal identification through experimental and natural experimental designs and on characterizing the specific subpopulations for which effects are identified. This trend is eroding the position of traditional regression studies as the prevailing convention for quantitative causal research in political science. This essay clarifies what is at stake. I provide a causal empiricist critique of conventional regression studies, a statement of core pillars of causal empiricism, and a discussion of how causal empiricism and theory interact. I propose that the trend toward causal empiricism should be welcomed by a broad array of political scientists. The trend fits into a broader push to reimagine our discipline in terms of collective research programs with high standards for evidence and a research division of labor.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983326135&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84983326135&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1086/686690

    DO - 10.1086/686690

    M3 - Review article

    VL - 78

    SP - 941

    EP - 955

    JO - Journal of Politics

    JF - Journal of Politics

    SN - 0022-3816

    IS - 3

    ER -